UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CROP CIRCLES OF 2006

06 Formations

Updated Wednesday 4th October  2006

Discus North American Crop Circles  on the Forum


ICCRA Report – Beloit, Mitchell County, Kansas Crop Circle, Sept. 9, 2006

This is in Beloit Kansas, USA
 
I don't know anything about any of this stuff, just that this is what we found one day beside the highway in good old rural Kansas :)  Sort of creepy even if you don't believe in that sort of stuff.

PRELIMINARY  REPORT - BLT Research Team,  8/20/06

 
Location:   Geneseo, Illinois  (USA) 
Crop:   Soybeans  (Round-Up Ready) 
Date Formed:   August 16, 2006 (?) 
Date Found:   August 17, 2006 
Photos:   qc times 

 Description:   5 circles total:  3 approx. 50' in diameter. abutting each other, 2 smaller circles (approx. 25' diameter.) on either side of centre circle.  All circles swirled clockwise.  The farmer (photo above) reports that neither he nor the Sheriff found any trail into circles on Aug. l9th when field was first examined and no evidence could be found of human involvement.  He also reports that the plants were flattened  (not broken) in 90-degree angles at the base and states that he doesn't think people made these circles.  He adds that the plants are not dead and that, because of the height of leaf recovery back up toward the sun, it is his impression that the circles have not been there any longer than one week.  The farmer does not have farm animals or dogs, but he has observed no unusual EM activity, no unusual smells or light phenomena during the last week.  He was unaware that similar circles were found in a soybean field in Belleville, Illinois very recently. 

 
BLT field personnel are en route and an update will be posted when we have more information. 
 
Nancy Talbott 
BLT Research Team, Inc. 
P.O. Box 400127 
Cambridge, Massachusetts  (USA) 
ph:  617/492-0415

Location: 13566 North 2100th Ave, Geneseo, Illinois USA 61254
Map:  
Crop: Soybean Field
Description Three 50ft interconnected circles in a linear fashion and two none connected 25ft Left & Right lateral circles arranged from the centre circle. Bottom of each plant seem to be sliced at an 80-degree angle with dark brown spotting around the incision area. In the normal field, soy plants are tightly planted and the soil seems to be dense and moist with no exposed patches. However, in each circle centre there is a dry patch of soil with no visible plant systems in a diameter of 1-2 feet. Round this was the A typical circle with the plants laying in a right-handed pattern and only a few inches thick from the ground. Even though it seems to rotate in a circular fashion, there are areas of each circle where the plants seem to be laying in a 1-3ft wide zigzagging pattern. This disturbance in the pattern was slight and did not interfere with the overall circular formation.
Discovery:

8/19/06 by James Stahl (owner of the crop field)

Name: Sean Connor
Status:  

Image Sean Connor Copyright 2006


Unusual Illinois Event

BLT Research Team Inc.
Cambridge, MA  (USA)
ph:  617/492-0415

web:site:  www.bltresearch.com
em
ail bltresearch@comcast.net 

Preliminary Report -12 August 2006 

Location:   Belleville, Illinois (USA)
BLT Field Team
:   JoAnne Scarpellini,  Troy Tyler
Event Date
:   July 30, 2006   (Light Phenomena)
Early to Mid-July (?), 2006   (Ground Markings)

Crop
:   Soybeans
Description
:   Unusual aerial lights reported to Illinois MUFON on July 30 by one individual; multiple circles in a soybean field also reported to MUFON 1-2 days later by a supposedly separate witness.  This second individual subsequently reported the soybean circles to the Crop Circle Connector or or about August 7, but he has provided no contact info to either  MUFON or the Connector.  On August 6th Illinois MUFON requested  BLT's help investigating the soybean circles in conjunction with their inquiry into the reported aerial light phenomena.

FULL REPORT HERE


UPDATE

New Crop Circle Formation in Sandyville, Ohio 

I got back very late on Sunday (actually way early on Monday morning), so I haven’t had time to write our full report, but we did make a public statement on Sunday afternoon when we finished our investigation to the State Highway Patrol officer who was there (he was interested enough that he even took with him an ICCRA report on the 2003 Locust Grove-Serpent Mound formation after I showed him what anomalous damage looks like, and explained that we didn’t find it there), several press outlets (including Fox 8) and the gathered visitors at the crop circle site.  We found evidence consistent with what we have seen in mechanical man-made formations (including board marks, broken stalks in areas where visitors had not trampled, scrape marks on stalks from a board, and pathway “artifacts” left from the mechanical creation process), and we found no anomalies (no unusual plant damage, completely normal radiation and E-M fields, etc…) unlike what we have seen in previous non-man-made formations in soybeans.  Essentially, we determined the formation to be man-made.  I’ll be putting out a fuller report with photos of the evidence as soon as I can (probably later today).  Late yesterday, we were told by locals that the Tuscarawas County Sheriff’s Department was saying that they ‘had caught / arrested’ 4 individuals (two adults, two underage teens) responsible for making the formation.  Several local news outlets are now reporting on the “confession,” and their slant is that the “UFO investigation” is now deflated, and that these hoaxer kids are so upstanding, they are coming forward to make restitution to the farmer and that they feel bad they caused so much trouble:

http://www.ohio.com/mld/ohio/news/15116008.htm 

http://www.timesreporter.com/index.php?ID=56553&r=5 

Neither of the above two articles mentions ICCRA involvement or our findings, which may be a little odd considering the amount of attention we received there, and the number of media people we talked to.  The first story names some unnamed person who supposedly took a Geiger counter into the field and reported radiation – this was certainly not us, as we detected normal levels of radiation, electric fields, and magnetic fields.  The second story quotes the Sheriff as saying some crop circle researchers got argumentative with him when he told them it was hoaxed – again, I’m not sure who he is referring to, but that also clearly wasn’t us as our only contact with the local Sheriff’s Department was two phone calls – the first to find out the location and to determine if they had conducted an investigation (they had, but their weren’t releasing any information about it), and the second time was to notify them that we had contacted the farmer and left a message for him and were waiting for his permission before we would enter the field (we subsequently located the landowner who did give us written permission to enter the field) and the conversations were polite and brief (they seemed like they were fielding a lot of calls on this). 

I also made a statement to a reporter from the local paper before the news broke on the hoaxers asking that if anyone has any information on who may have hoaxed the formation to contact the local sheriff because this was a serious amount of money the farmer stands to lose (soybeans are around $6-$7 a bushel / low avg. of 50 bushels of soybeans per acre; the formation was approx. 230’ long x 130’ wide + all the visitor tracks – makes this more well more than an acre of crop lost.  It could be close to $1,000 or more of damage).  This is criminal property damage and criminal trespass, and that whoever is responsible needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to prevent this kind of thing happening in the future.  Hopefully, people will also learn that we can make a determination between mechanically man-made formations and ‘authentic’ ones (non-man-made) and this will cut down on future hoaxers too.  

By the way, this is now the second hoaxed crop circle formation in north-eastern Ohio in the past month.  We also investigated a single circle attempt in a mixed grass/shrubs field in Newbury, Geauga County, Ohio reported on July 7.  We identified that one clearly as a hoax within minutes of arriving (same reasons as above). 

Hopefully this isn’t becoming a trend up there!  Feel free to pass this on to anyone you feel may be interested…

Jeffrey Wilson


New Crop Circle Formation in Sandyville, Ohio 

MORE DETAILS TO FOLLOW

On Saturday morning July 22, a new crop circle formation was reported near the small village of Sandyville, Tuscarawas County, Ohio (thanks to Delores and Sharon for notifying us and providing us with good details!).  The formation was not in the field on Friday at 7 PM when Sharon went past the field on her way home.  Friday night / early Saturday morning there were fierce storms with heavy rain and wind that hit the region, and many nearby areas are now flooded.  The formation was spotted in the field on Saturday morning and reported to the Tuscarawas County Sheriff’s Department and to several local media outlets.  The Tuscarawas County Sheriff’s Department sent out a deputy to investigate, and he has been reported as saying that upon entering the field, the only footprints he found were his own -- while he walked the formation. 

The formation is a soybean field, and the soybeans are 1-2 feet tall (relatively short as it is still early yet for soybean growth in Ohio).  The field is located along the banks of the Nimishillen Creek (still very swollen as seen in the photos) just above where it merges with Sandy Creek.  The formation consists of two main components: (1) a ‘bullseye’-shaped symbol with two flattened rings surrounding a smaller flattened circle with quadrant-spaced flattened pathways connecting the rings and circle; and (2) a single circle.  Even though this formation is less than 24 hours old, it has already suffered much pedestrian traffic, with at least 9 separate pathways streaming into the formation, and a section of soybeans flattened down by a 4-wheeler in a “curly-q” shape near an access lane.  It is also unclear whether the pathway connecting the “bullseye” and the second circle was part of the formation originally, or came as a result of visitors. 

As word got out about the formation, ICCRA member Chris Steele arranged us a photo flight, and we made it over the formation just before sunset.  Through light rain was falling, and with the daylight fading as we arrived at sunset, I managed to get several photos:

Several members of the ICCRA will be meeting at the formation site to attempt to conduct ground investigations on Sunday, July 23.  Hopefully the damage won’t be too extensive and we will be able to get some worthwhile data. We will keep everyone informed as information is collected…

  

Jeffrey Wilson

Director, ICCRA –

Independent Crop Circle Researchers’ Association [International]

jeff.wilson@asmnet.com or jeff.wilson@adelphia.net

www.cropcirclenews.com  

Independent Crop Circle Researchers’ Association (International) [ICCRA]

The Independent Crop Circle Researchers’ Association (International) [ICCRA] began as a small cooperative group of individuals in the Midwestern United States who have long pursued serious research into the crop circle phenomenon with the principle of open collaboration. This ‘team’ of researchers has steadily grown in number, and has now included contributions from members of the crop circle research community from around the world.  Although all the researchers in this association are considered independent (and thereby retaining individual ownership of their work), the investigative community has recognized that the study of the various complexities and aspects of the crop circle phenomenon are beyond the abilities and resources of any one researcher or local group to study in sufficient depth. Hence, the need for a cooperative association and network dedicated to the widest and freest possible collection and dissemination of crop circle research.   

The ICCRA recognizes the need in the research community to collect and make available as much objectively verifiable knowledge and details about crop circles as possible, and so will continue to study and document crop formations using a scientific framework.  

The ICCRA is committed to working cooperatively with local farmers, respecting their property and conditions for granting permission and access to their fields, and can provide experienced consultation as to the ways they can cope with the existence of having a crop circle in their field.  We are also committed to working cooperatively with law enforcement agencies to assist them in assessing and investigating reported crop circles, exposing the vandalism of crop circle hoaxers, and assisting with advice on the management of visitors to the crop circle sites. 

The ICCRA began as a ‘core’ group of individuals cooperating as a rapid response team reacting to reports of local crop circles in order to study and document them. The ICCRA has recognized the need to expand the response network to include as many interested researchers as possible.  To facilitate this network, the ICCRA has begun a researcher directory so that when a crop circle is reported, the closest local investigators will be notified.  This will provide the best opportunity to investigate and document the site, and also gives the wider, international community a contact-resource for information and interaction in real time. 

The ICCRA’s highest priority is the sharing of information and research with the wider research community. Reporting and sharing of news and field reports of formations is being carried out through www.cropcirclenews.com. To help standardize report information, researcher access to a worldwide crop circle database with professional-level GIS mapping capability is also being developed at this website which will not only document and share the information collected in a systematic manner, but will also provide new research opportunities.  This research center will also serve as a depository of information collected on historical sites, scientific reports, photos, previous field reports, the researcher directory, and links to further crop circle resources.  Many independent researchers have amassed valuable files over the years regarding this phenomenon. We encourage all such researchers to use this opportunity to enrich the wider community with your archived knowledge, while at the same time retaining ownership and credit for your years of effort.   

All interested researchers, and both new and previously established organizations and networks are invited to join this cooperative and collaborative effort to locate, study, document, and share information about crop circle formations, regardless of each individual’s personal hypothesis regarding the source cause of the authentic crop circle phenomenon, or their affiliations with any organizations. 


Click on thumbnails to enlarge

Images Patricia Hagy Copyright 2006


Huntingburg, Dubois County, Indiana

by Jeff Wilson

UPDATE

There are several diagrams of the Huntingburg, Indiana, USA formation that I’ve seen floating around now, most of them are quite inaccurate.  Based upon the measurements made over this past weekend by ICCRA members Ted Robertson, Roger Sugden, and myself, I’ve put together a more accurate silhouette diagram and also one with accompanying geometry that seems implicit in the formation.  Our ICCRA team is still analyzing the sampling and meter data, and we hope to have results soon.  But I wanted to send this out before our report to correct some of the inaccuracies out there. 

I’d also like to point out one additional interesting detail – both ends of both of the ¾ rings flowed into the main circle.  The point in the rings at which the flattened lay diverged in opposite directions (one direction uphill, the other downhill) was along the central axis marked in magenta on the left diagram.  Lots of additional interesting details, so more to come. 

Jeffrey Wilson

Director, ICCRA

Independent Crop Circle Researchers’ Association

 


Crop Circles Appear In Huntingburg

June 30, 2006 12:57 AM Many Tri-State farmers are busy with wheat harvesting, soybean planting and tending to their corn crops.  But one farmer in Dubois County found something in his wheat field that cut back on how much harvesting he has to do.  It's something he's never seen before - a crop circle left behind by someone...or something.

"This was really kind of impressive. You hate to lose the crop, but it was kind of impressive, the way they did the design." David Ring is having a little fun with this one. He's been farming in Huntingburg for more then ten years and never seen anything quite like this - a huge crop circle in the middle of his wheat field. "First I thought it was where sometimes, when you apply nitrogen to weed it goes down on its own, but this was just too perfect a circle."

Click on Thumbnail to enlarge

A perfect circle, complete with a design, about 150 feet in diameter. Ring says, "Somebody spent a lot of time working on this, because it was done to perfection, if you will, on this project."

The circle looks impressive in the aerial photos, but from the ground, it's even more impressive - especially the way the wheat lays so flat against the ground.

Click on Thumbnail to enlarge

This part of Huntingburg is quite rural, but well travelled, with the airport near Ring's fields. So how did this huge circle, in the middle of a wheat field in Dubois County, get there?

Ring tells us, "It took either one person or several people lots of hours to roll that much weed down - or the aliens - maybe it was them, who knows?" And maybe we'll never know. Ring's story is now the talk of the town - it even made the front page of the local newspaper. It's certainly something people will be talking about for some time to come.

Source http://www.14wfie.com/Global/story.asp?S=5095329&nav=3w6o
 

UPDATE
 

Location:  Huntingburg, Indiana (USA)

 
Date Occurred:  June 10, 2006 (? - farmer's best
guesstimate)
 
Discovered:  June 25,  2006 while harvesting
 
Crop:  Wheat  (fully mature)
 
<haracteristics:  A 100 ft.+ diameter circle with a 2 ft. wide, approx. 80 ft. long pathway with 2 shorter straight pathways going off long path, creating a "key" effect.
 
EM Effects:  Manager of nearby airport, Travis McQueen, reports a major power failure at the airport one night a week or so prior to the discovery of the formation;  farmer David Ring reports
that his son (who lives nearby) also experienced power problems around that same time.  However there were storms in the area, so the power problems may be associated more with the weather than with the formation.
 
Fieldwork:  BLT Research Team's JoAnne Scarpellini will evaluate formation for sampling (<bold>farmer has already cut the entire field</bold>, so analysis may be limited)
 
 
This is the first definitely geometric crop circle reported here in the USA in 2006, and it has several interesting characteristics:
 
(1) As in several other cases over the years, and in particular as in the North Dakota case last summer, it's quite near a local airport;
 
(2) As in the North Dakota 2005 event, there is ALSO randomly-downed crop very near this new formation;
 
(3) And, as in the North Dakota 2005 event, there was a major power outage at the airport (and in the local community) around the time the farmer thinks this formation occurred;
 
(4) ALSO, this new formation has what looks like a curving "tractor" line, or "2-wheeler" marking going off one side of the circle which--according to the farmer David Ring--WAS NOT CAUSED BY THE TRACTOR, but is part of the formation.  BLT field personnel observed a similar marking in 2005, at the Weaverville, North Carolina formation in grasses;
 
(5) Finally, there is a long, narrow pathway going off the circle with a "key" effect near the end, reminiscent of other crop circles in the past here in the US and abroad.
 
 
This 2006 Huntingburg, Indiana photo, below, was taken by Travis McQueen-Manager of the local airport (note randomly-downed areas near the circle as well as the curving double-lines which go off the right side of the circle which the farmer states were NOT caused by the tractor, but were apparently part of the event itself):

 
Here's the 2005 North Dakota formation (again, note the randomly-downed crop nearby):

 
 And here's the 2005 Weaverville, NC circle with the curving "2-wheeler" tracks going off one side (the BLT Team came to the conclusion that these tracks, too, were a part of the original formation and not caused by a tractor or 2-wheeler):

 

 

 
Additional info will be posted on the BLT web-site when fieldwork has been carried out. 
 
 Nancy Talbott
 
BLT Research Team, Inc.
 
P.O. Box 400127
 
Cambridge, Massachusetts  (USA)
 
 
ph:  617/492-0415

Location: Herington, Kansas (USA)
Date Occurred:   ?
Date Found:    June 2, 2006
Crop:  Winter Wheat
Description:  2 approx. 20 ft-diameter. circles, separated by 8-10 ft. of
standing crop
Photo:  not yet available  

While checking his field prior to intended harvest, farmer Merle Ecklund discovered 2 circles near the edge of his wheat-field, which were not seen in March when the field was sprayed with an herbicide. Since Mr. Ecklund had not visited the field since March, the date of arrival of the circles is unknown.  However, the plants inside these circles are markedly different from the norm, in that  (a) the plants are all standing, (b) the plants in the centres of the circles are very short--but apparently have fully developed seed-heads, and (c) there is a 4-inch-wide perimeter swath of plants in which the plants are "at least 1 ft. taller" than the crop in the rest of the field.  Mr. Ecklund states that the centre plants are only about 4 inches tall, with seed-heads, and that the seeds within these seed-heads are "shrunken" and "brown."  Further he reports that the plants get taller as they approach the edges of the circles, up to the perimeter swath. These perimeter plants were still green when the circles were first found and the seed-heads in these plants are nearly "twice the size" of the normal, controls outside the circles.  This means that the seed-heads in this 4-inch-wide perimeter swath are about 6 inches long, and contain much larger seeds.  

The farmer states that UFO activity was reported nearby in February and wondered if whatever occurred in his field happened back then, when the seed was still in the ground (before any shoot development).   He states that his dog would "not go into the centres of the circles" (returning instead to the car) and that he could see no insects in these centres.  He also reports watching birds separate and fly "around" the sides of the circles, rather than fly directly over them. Mr. Ecklund is a dowser and reports that he and 2 other people all tried the dowsing rods and observed them to "cross right away" in the centres; it was his feeling that there was a "lot of energy in the centres" of the circles.  

The owner of the land (Mr. Ecklund rents this property) called in some specialists from Kansas State University and some soil samples were taken, and Ecklund believes higher nitrogen values were reported to have been found in the soil from the perimeter ring area.  

For many years W.C. Levengood has stated that he has found evidence of "clear delineation" of the various energies involved in creating crop circles.  These Kansas circles--because they were not discovered until the field had had time to mature-- may be demonstrating exactly this point.  Two of the energies hypothesized by Levengood as being involved in crop circle causation are microwave radiation (which is thought to be responsible for retardation of growth frequently documented when circles occur in immature crop) and unusual electrical pulses (which are known to promote growth, as well as yield).  If WCL is correct, the markedly smaller centre plants must be revealing the effects of exposure to concentrated microwaves--while the taller perimeter plants show the result of exposure to the unusual electrical pulses (called "ion avalanches" by WCL)--both effects now evident because the circles were not discovered and the plants were allowed to grow to maturity following the initial exposure. 

The BLT Research Team will obtain both plant and soil samples and will follow up the Kansas State University test results as soon as possible.   Photo(s) will be provided as soon as they are available.

 
CORRECTIONS TO INITIAL REPORT:
 
Date Found:  June 2, 2006
Plant Heights (approx.):  From this photo it is clear that the stunted plants in the centres were much taller than the 4-6" initially reported to BLT;  we are guessing here that these are in fact about 19-20 inches tall.   BLT fieldworker JoAnne Scarpellini will measure the actual plant heights in both circles and we will include this information is a later report.

2.  Wheat heights - 2 stalks at bottom of photo are from 4"-wide perimeter ring;  2 middle stalks are CONTROLS;  2 shortest stalks (uppermost in photo) are from centre.  Photo:  Renee Ecklund:

Click on Thumbnail to enlarge

Two circles at edge of field; an oil rig is out in field, behind circles

Click on Thumbnail to enlarge

Images Diane Ecklund Copyright 2006

 

Nancy Talbott
BLT Research Team, Inc.
P.O. Box 400127
Cambridge, Massachusetts  (USA)
ph:  617/492-0415

Word has been spreading of the ‘reverse crop circles’ in which irregular rings of raised wheat were reported in Herrington, Kansas. The wheat in the rings are raised up taller than the surrounding wheat by an inch or two.  If you haven’t heard of this yet, you can get additional details at these links:

http://www.earthfiles.com/news/news.cfm?ID=1100&category=Environment

But here is a news clipping with a photo:

Click on Thumbnail to enlarge

As odd as this may seem, there are at least two (non-phenomenon) possibilities which could be responsible for the raised rings: (1) excessive fertilizer applied to the area in the shape of the ring – this is alluded to in the above caption with the term ‘prankster chemist’.  By applying a chemical fertilizer to the wheat (or any grain or grasses) you can literally ‘paint’ shapes and designs which can only be seen later as your extra-fertilized plants grow up in the shape or design that you’ve intended.  It is possible this is what occurred in Kansas as the rings are adjacent to the edge of the field for easy access by someone.  It is possible that the samples collected by Kansas State University will be able to determine this.  (2) a fungus responsible for ‘fairy rings’ may be evident here – a similar effect can be seen in turf-type grasses where taller, more lush grass in the shape of a ring appears in the midst of shorter, less vibrant grass.  As the fungus in the soil spreads, at its’ margins the fungus deposits nutrients that the grass feeds on to make it more lush, and because the fungus grows out in roughly the shape of the circle, you get a ‘ring’ of darker, more lush grass, while the grass inside the ring becomes stunted, or is actually killed off.  Descriptions of the Kansas ring include mentioning that the wheat inside the ring area was shorter than the non-affected wheat outside the ring.  Both effects of taller wheat in an outside ring and shorter wheat inside the ring might take place if there is a fungus in the soil affecting the area.  Every year in the USA at least one or more ‘fairy ring/fungus ring’ events gets reported in the media as being a crop circle event. 

A third (phenomenon) possibility exists which is described by Nancy Talbott of BLT, Inc. at the Crop Circle Connector link above.  Hopefully the Kansas State soil analysis will be able to determine an outcome.

This is now the third time I’ve run across this type of ‘raised’ growth phenomena in the past couple of weeks!  The first was on a trip back from Michigan over Memorial Day weekend, where my wife Delsey and I were travelling across back roads in Ohio looking at fields on our way home and spotted this:

Click on Thumbnail to enlarge

It appeared to me to be a series of raised-growth concentric rings in a wheat field alongside the Miami River near Logansville, Ohio.  We were in a hurry, but I stopped long enough to snap a couple of photos. A few days later, Roger Sugden had time to get down to the area to talk with the farmer – an Amish farmer – who said that he and a friend of his had spread manure out in the field in the shape of a spiral – and that had he known this would be the effect, he’d have signed his initials! 

The second ‘raised growth’ effect I was notified of came from the site manager at Serpent Mound.  At a recent event I was volunteering at, he asked me if I had time to run up to Seip Mound in Bainbridge, Ohio (he also manages that park) to take a look at some unusual damage to the mound that had been reported there.  So Delsey and I drove up to see this ‘damage’:

Click on Thumbnail to enlarge

Along the south side of the mound, right on the mound itself, were ‘inscribed’ three straight lines of taller, lusher grass that all came together at a single point at the base of the mound.  Where the three lines came together, there was the tallest, darkest clump of grass which had in the centre an area of grass that had been killed by excessive fertilizer and had dried out and yellowed completely.  While it is unknown who did this to the mound, it was clear that someone had created the symbol intentionally there. 

I hope that this ‘raised effect’ has not become the new fashion for hoaxers… 

Jeffrey Wilson

Director, ICCRA  

Independent Crop Circle Researchers’ Association [International]

jeff.wilson@asmnet.com or jeff.wilson@adelphia.net

www.cropcirclenews.com  

734-891-2689 (cell)


Location: Lost Springs, Kansas
Map: see map and article here:

http://earthfiles.com/news/news.cfm?ID=1100&category=Environment

Crop: Wheat
Description: Accelerated and decelerated growth of wheat in the pattern of a circle surrounded by two rings
Discovery:

Friday, June 2, about 2:30 p.m

Name: Ross Andrews
Status:  

BLT RESEARCH TEAM

(Science and the Circles)

 


 

Hit Counter