We are all Ying Yangs !  

  Reported Aug 6, 2013, is the day of 11 Qanil, 13 day week of Tijax. 

  Tijax is the 8^th day , and the 8^th Hexagram of the I-Ching. It is the “union of men” and balance of polarity. In terms of electricity, this is the current which flows between the positive and negative poles.

    In terms of “peepole” it is the multiplicity which happens when we are “twitterpated” and overcome with the desire to mate. The simple laws of attraction. Divided we fall.                

  11 Qanil,  only happens in Tijax. 11 is transmutation of knowledge or gateway, and Qanil is the sperm and the egg. It is the Yin and the Yang. Being that we all came from a sperm and an egg (fair assumption) , we are all a bunch of “ying yangs”. Hexagrams 17 and 18 work together. The gathering together and forming a solid union is the cube within the circle of this formation. The single “stem” is Tijax and it is Lanthanum, like which, it is a point of separation into something entirely different. Lanthanides are unionized. 

  Union is a concept of material solidification. When we unionize, we become strong as a unit. 2 heads are better than 1. But , how many heads until we reach the point of “diminishing returns” ?  It depends on innovation. The issue of population is directly linked to human innovation the same way, heights of buildings are linked to structural design creativity. Creation is creative. Memorization stifles. 

  My favorite artist  born during Qanil is Bronwyn Oliver. She was born on the day of Kawoq in the week of Qanil. Kawoq is next to Tijax and is the #12 day in the week of Qanil. Complete understanding of the Seed. Her designs were often made of soft tissue. She produced these …..

A monument.

      Tapei 101 is a landmark sky scraper that opened on Dec 31, 2004. That day was 4 Qanil in Rope decan. It has a unique structural apparatus called a “tuned mass dampener” . It is a magnificent structure and is also highly regarded for being the largest “Green” building in the world.

      It has a seed inside it..

    here is the motif above the entrance of the tower

   here is the design of the courtyard outside the main entrance

  This is the color coded energetic signature of Qanil from “Family”.

The polar opposite day which is 11 Tijax in the week of Qanil gave birth to Starbucks March 30, 1971. The highly appropriate Logo design for that is derived from this...

   Shape and Time are unionized. All things take on traits according to their “birthdate” and destiny flows like a river of electrified seeds ,  each one whining and screaming to find its partner or group. Know the Self, find the other(s). 

 Artstrologydatechecker 

David Odell

Alfredo Villa

Monument Hill, Devizes, Wiltshire, United Kingdom. Reported 6th August.

This would be a perspective illustration of a cube

The yellow circle is an exact circle. It shows the geometrically correction of the inner crop circle.

Sorry, no chance to give this cube some perspective shape.

THAT POINT OF REFERENCE AGAIN? 

In my article of August 7, on the Wessex Ridgeway circle, which was reported on July 24, I claimed that that formation and the ogham-glyph circle [as I call it], of 29 days earlier, form part of a series of this year's UK field displays that are linked geodetically to the estimated centre of Silbury Hill's summit. I was therefore intrigued to discover that, on August 6, as I was close to finishing the article, the impressive formation at Monument Hill was reported [but I didn't find out about it until much later]. It occurred to me that, if my theory is valid, as I'm convinced it is, this striking structure, of all others, would surely concur with it. Although I haven't yet had the chance to do what I always consider to be imperative - carefully survey the formation - the illuminating result of my preliminary enquiry has persuaded me to submit this incomplete analysis to the CCC. 

I'll be referring to the following adaptation of Frank Laumen's excellent photograph:- 

Fig. 1 

Knowing that, to understand crop circles, you often have to be able to think like a child, I was soon drawn to the straight-line structure within the central circle. I concluded that its architect - when creating what is probably a perspective drawing of a cube [as Jack Sullivan said] - had elected to avoid showing the body's one corner [and its associated edges/faces], even though this could have been achieved easily with dotted lines, as shown in the crude Fig. below:- 

Fig. 2 

And observing that the cube's 1 missing corner is being overshadowed by its 7 visible ones, I realised that the simple juxtaposition of these primes can infer another prime, 17, which had a central role in my article of August 7. Amongst other things, I demonstrated that the sequence of the first 17 primes [starting with the supreme prime, 1, as stressed in my book] can infer a number, 6371, which replicates not just an up-to-date value, in km, of the earth's mean radius, but also the radius of the spherical earth model that, so I've discovered, formation geodesy is based on. But as the manifestation of the prime 17, in the Wessex Ridgeway circle, had been closely tied to the prime 13 [i.e. the 17 had been derived from a set of 13 orbiting spheres], I expected to find an expression of the latter number, here, also - and I wasn't disappointed! … 

Firstly, the cited explicit item of information displayed on the cube depiction just alluded to … 7, the quota of its visible corners … is the prime rank of 13 [i.e. 13 is the 7^th prime]. 

But secondly, and of great importance [in the current context], 13 happens to be the time span, in days, between when the Wessex Ridgeway circle and this one, at Monument Hill, were reported i.e. the first was on July 24 [day 205] and the latter, on August 6 [day 218]. 

It now appeared, then, that the two edifices were linked both structurally and chronologically and, having recognised this, I couldn't fail to notice that perhaps the most prominent attribute of the latest formation - its circular display of odd looking, interlinked pictograms - exhibits another close bond with the Wessex Ridgeway creation. … 

These mysterious, circumferential structures - which I believe we are being told form part of the same group of objects, because they are all joined by a continuous band of flattened crop [identified in the Figs below] - are 11 in number, comprising a total of 10 of the 1^st depicted type and, 1 of the 2^nd [Note: the reason for this splitting of the 11 shall be explained again]:- 

Fig. 3 

Apart from the cited band of flattened crop, which physically links these 11 objects together, their commonality is also being stressed, I believe, by the fact that they share the following, explicit attributes [also highlighted in the Fig.]:- 

[1] each sits on the circle that encompasses the cube;

[2] the upper region of each comprises a prominent, oval structure. 

My interest in the quoted 11 [another prime] stems from the fact that the 11^th prime, 29, had a pivotal role in the Wessex Ridgeway circle. … The displacement, expressed in metres, of the structure's uniquely defined central point, from the estimated centre of Silbury Hill's summit, was 29x353, where 353, the 72^nd prime [72 being a pentagonal number], was the measured displacement between the same Silbury Hill point and the centre of the pentagonaly based ogham-glyph circle, which was reported 29 days before the Wessex Ridgeway formation. 

I therefore wondered if this dominant position, within the Monument Hill formation, of the prime rank of 29 [i.e. 11], was telling us something about a similar relationship that exists between the structure and the cited, estimated centre of Silbury Hill's summit. 

At this juncture I noted the obvious fact that the next whole number after the circumferential 11 i.e. 12 - the letter endowment of a relevant name, Monument Hill - is closely associated with the figure that the circle encompasses i.e. a theoretical cube is endowed with a total of 12 edges [the 3 hidden ones being shown in my earlier Fig.]. Furthermore, when these edges are labelled, 1 to 12, thus [where I've superimposed the numbers on the cited diagram]:- 

Fig. 4 

- the sum of those labels is, 78 [= 1+2+…+11+12], and this has an interesting interpretation in the context of the date the formation was reported i.e. day 218 [= August 06]. 

When 78 is taken from the 218^th prime, 1327, we obtain 1249, which is the 205^th prime, and we know that the Wessex Ridgeway formation was reported on the year's 205^th day: July 24. 

It was clear, then, that a simple attribute of a cube, its quota of 12 edges, embodies another way of tying the two formations together, chronologically. 

This simple revelation now aroused my curiosity concerning the word itself: does CUBE give us a pointer [as was the case with the word TICK, in my earlier analysis] to what this esoteric communication is trying to tell us? 

When its 4 letters were again apportioned numbers that represent their respective positions, in our 26-lettered alphabet, they yielded a combined value of … 31 [= 3+21+2+5] … which is a prime, but not just an ordinary one, in the current context: it is the 12^th prime; 12 being, as we know, a cube's allotment of edges [Note. And the digits 3-2-1-2-5 add up to the familiar: 13]. 

This elementary discovery, then, raised the exciting possibility that the ostensibly innocuous 12^th prime … 31 … is at the heart of what the magnificent Monument Hill circle is all about, and, as mentioned earlier, even its name is comprised of 12 letters. But before I explain how I subjected this hypothesis to a simple but demanding test, I'll demonstrate that there are still a few more snippets of relevant data lurking in the arrangement we've been looking at. … 

One of my first observations had been that the formation's representation of a cube can point to a simple manifestation of a prime: 17. And as shown in my article of August 7, the first 17 such primes are as follows:- 

1-2-3-5-7-11-13-17-19-23-29-31-37-41-43-47-53 

But these add up to a number that can be expressed as … 29+353 … which bears an obvious relationship to the distance [measured on the spherical Earth model] between a central point in the Wessex Ridgeway circle and the estimated centre of Silbury hill's summit: 29x353 m. 

I also pointed out, however, that the depicted array of primes comprises 29 digits. But I didn't refer to the fact that their sum, another prime, is … 103. In the current context, this additional morsel of information proves to be exceedingly interesting. … 

We now know, on the one hand, that the value of CUBE is the prime 31, whilst, on the other, that the '17' we inferred from the formation's cube is closely tied to 103, another prime. 

It doesn't require a giant leap of imagination to recognise that the cited 103, inextricably linked as it is to the first 17 primes, can be expressed as:- 31+72 

- where 72 is the all-important pentagonal number, whose prime rank is the above cited 353. 

If we now juxtapose the foregoing information [where '72p' represents 'the 72^nd prime', 353]:- 

the sum of the first 17 primes can be expressed as … 29+72p

the sum of those primes' digits can be expressed as … 31+72 

- an intriguing question immediately comes to mind. … 

As we know that the measurement, on the Earth model, from the cited Silbury Hill point to the one in the Wessex Ridgeway formation can be expressed, in metres, as … 29x72p … are we being told that the second set of numbers, above … 31 & 72 … also defines the value of a relevant dimension [in the current context] to the point on the ancient, manmade mound? 

As I said earlier, I haven't yet been able to get to the Monument Hill site but, thanks to the remarkable images published by the CCC, I know what field the formation there is lodged within, and I think that the following diagram, which depicts an arc, of length, in metres, of … 31x72p [i.e. 10,943] … which is centred on Silbury Hill, speaks for itself:- 

Fig. 5 

It's clear, then, that the arc not only traverses the field that accommodates the structure it also appears, from a consideration of the available photographs, to penetrate it, an observation that can be easily checked by any competent person, visiting the formation, who's equipped with a GPS, or GPS-enabled mobile [set for WGS 84]. Indeed, I'd be most grateful if someone could furnish the CCC with the necessary information - and they may find that the following set of coordinates, pertaining to the above depicted arc, will help them to determine, for themselves, where it cuts the formation:- 

Fig. 6 

To conclude this submission, I'd say that my claim, concerning a number of this year's circles and Silbury Hill, has again been corroborated but the cited missing detail will still be of immense interest. 

© Neil Hudson Newman: 12 August, 2013

I was playing around today with a conjecture I had about the recent "off" cube formation, (Monument Hill, Etchilhampton, Wiltshire   |6th August 2013 | Wheat OH) and superimposed the equally "off" icosahedron formation from last year (Owslebury nr Winchester, Hampshire | 29th July 2012 | Wheat OH ).  What resulted was a reasonable correspondence, given that camera angles most likely varied somewhat.  I'm not sure what this means, but wanted to share the parallel with others who are intrigued by the peculiar proportioning of both formations.

Sarah Susanka