 |
 |
 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
by Rieks Schreuder
TWO
NOVAE, A VILLAGE AND SILBURY HILL
Part One: the novae and the village
For initial purposes I'll be using the following adaptation of the
excellent photograph that Frank Lauman has kindly made available:-
Fig. 1
Although my first view of this formation gave me the impression that it
wasn't manmade, I soon concluded that if I was going to analyse it I'd
be presented with a real challenge: it was devoid of certain features I
expect to find in a genuine circle. And when I roughly estimated its
displacement from the centre of Silbury Hill's summit I also found that
it didn't adhere to the pattern I'd identified in other formations this
year [explained in my preceding articles].
So I knew that if I was going to unravel the meaning of this field
edifice my knowledge and experience would be tested to the limit.
However, a stunning insight by a seasoned researcher in this area handed
me, in due course, the opening I'd been waiting for. …
Red Collie claimed that Nova Delphini 2013 - found on August 14
at 18.00 UTC - was being alluded to in the formation on August 13
[the year's 225th day] and this excited me as soon as
I encountered it [weeks after it had been put online!]. He believed that
the necklace-like crop circle, which [as he demonstrated] resembled
supernova 1987A both visually and in a more scientific way, was
being linked to a different type of stellar explosion, a nova,
that was first observed, in the constellation of Delphinus, just one
day after the formation had been found. The relevant information is
summarised in the Fig. below, which includes an adaptation of Bertold
Zugelder's useful drawing, which I thank him for:-
Fig. 2
Although I now suspected that this theory holds the key to unlocking the
formation's mystery I was aware that two fundamental questions still
needed to be addressed. …
1] Why should pedantic crop circle builders have displayed, in our
fields, an image that's tied, in the indicated ways, to a supernova
explosion if they had wanted to highlight a stellar event that
represents a different and less intense stage of a star's lifecycle:
Nova Delphini 2013?
2] And why did those builders elect to create the circle, with its
unique form, one day before the cited nova would be first
observed on earth?
My attention was now drawn to the fact that the quoted isotope of
Titanium, which has a role in the supernova process, Titanium-44,
possesses an atomic nucleus that comprises a total of 22 protons
and 22 neutrons. I found this interesting, in the current
context, because although Red Collie didn't refer to it directly, the
formation is also made up of two distinct sets of 22. To
demonstrate the point, I've repeated the aforementioned drawing below:-
Fig. 3
Although no-one could dispute that the formation comprises 22
circles, the description isn't complete: each circular zone of flattened
crop merges with 2 hoop-like bands on its outside. So the whole
area of flattened crop is really a single, but fragmented, ring with one
sequence of 22 circular profiles on its inside and a bridging run
of 22 hoop-like profiles on its outside, as shown in the Fig.
below:-
Fig. 4
This reveals, then, that the formation could serve as a symbolic
representation of the atomic nucleus of Titanium-44, which
possesses an intimate group of 22 protons and 22
neutrons.
This link between the crop circle and the isotope of Titanium that's
closely associated with supernovae was so impressive, in fact, that I
wondered if the depicted arrangement holds the answer to at least one of
the questions I was grappling with. I therefore had no hesitation in
investigating whether prime numbers could shed any light on the
subject. …
I labelled the circles and hoops, in Fig. 4, with the primes that
correspond to the numbers currently there [I again didn't show the
second set, to avoid numerical congestion in the Fig.] as
depicted below:-
[Note: the prime corresponding to 5 is 7 (= 5p); the prime
corresponding to 22 is 73 (= 22p)]
Fig. 5
The significance of this double occurrence of the first 22 prime numbers
wasn't apparent until after I'd determined their overall total … 1426
[= 713+713].
Knowing that the formation had been first reported on day 225 of
the year and - 1 day later - on day 226, Nova Delphini
2013 was first detected, I now noted an extraordinary relationship
between these two events and the above arithmetic, and I've illustrated
it below. …
Fig. 6
In the Fig., the earlier cited fact is first repeated i.e. when 1
is added to 225, the day the crop circle was discovered, we
obtain 226, the day that Nova Delphini 2013 was
discovered.
But when 1 is similarly added to the other number we know is
closely linked to the formation - 1426 [the sum of the two sets
of 22 primes] - we obtain another factor that's unambiguously related to
the described 226, the day of the nova's discovery i.e. the
226th prime [= 1427].
So by adding 1 to each of the 2 factors we know the formation is
closely associated with, 225 [discovery day] & 1426
[derived from its link to Titanium-44, which is active in supernovae],
respectively, we produce 2 numbers that are inextricably related to the
day of the year when Nova Delphini 2013 was found: 226
[the day itself] and the 226th prime
[1427].
Evidently, then, our recognition of the latter relationship between the
formation's structure, which relates in 2 independent ways to known
characteristics of supernovae explosions, and the discovery of
the nova, 1 day after the circle was found at Hackpen
Hill, provides us with an independent and important confirmation of Red
Collie's original assertion. The formation was predicting, 1 day
before the event, our discovery of Nova Delphini 2013 on day
226! …
Knowing that there are some far reaching issues at stake here, I
concluded that the crop circle builders must have been inviting us
to find this conundrum, but I had no doubt that if that was the
case they'd have been obliged to provide us with at least one other
piece of information. They would have had to display, in the same field
edifice, a prominent manifestation of the cited 226, so
we'd know that the number does have a pivotal role in their
communication, as I've suggested. And fortunately I didn't have to wait
very long to find one. …
On August 31, the year's 243rd day, marked changes to
the formation were discovered and I'll be focussing on the respective
details, and their implications, in the 2nd part of this
article. One feature that needed little thought, however, was the fact
that the structure now comprised 7 distinct circles of
standing crop [3 continuous & 4 fragmented] as shown in the Fig.
below, where I've adapted Zef Damon's drawing, which he has kindly
allowed me to use:-
Fig. 7
Because of my current commitments to other projects, I didn't know, for
some weeks, about this significant alteration to the formation. When I
finally encountered it, however, I realised immediately that it was
giving us even more than I'd expected. It happens to be the case that
the number 226 [expressed as
226/100] played a key role in two other areas of my research, one of
which relates to the distant past. And my studies had exposed a way of
generating it, using a simple algorithm that's based on a prime
our remote ancestors revered … 7.
The algorithm can be conveniently described after we've placed the first
7 primes, in order, onto the lower half [as displayed] of the
7 circles in the above representation of the formation - starting
with 1 [= 1p] on the outer circle, and ending with 13 [=
7p], on the innermost, thus:-
Fig. 8
Each of the 7 circles now has 2 numbers sitting on it, as follows
[starting from the outside]:-
1 & 1;
2 & 2; 3 & 3; 4 & 5; 5 & 7; 6 & 11;
7 & 13
The products of these 7 numerical pairs are 1, 4, 9, 20, 35, 66 &
91, and their sum is … 226.
As far as I was concerned, then, the glaring modification of the
formation that was identified on August 31 represented, apart from
anything else, a bold statement that the number 226 did indeed
have a central role in the whole communication. And this conclusion
strongly supports the idea I described earlier concerning those who
built the Hackpen Hill circle [in its 2 stages] starting on the year's
225th day. …
The ostensibly chance discovery, 1 day later, of Nova Delphini
2013, on the year's 226th day, must have been
carefully engineered by them, presumably as some form of sign to
humanity!
I was also interested to note that when the cited 1 and 226
are juxtaposed they can infer 1226, because this number can be
expressed as 2x613, or, 2px113p [i.e. the
2nd prime x the 113th].
And the product of the inferred 2 and 113 yields another
manifestation of … 226.
So having a time gap of 1 day, before day 226 - as
occurs in the described relationship - can represent, through the logic
of primes, a subtle way of highlighting the latter number, and I've
illustrated the relationship in the Fig. below:-
Fig. 9
Having found this elementary way of generating the described 226,
from the inferred 1226, its simplicity suggested that we'd been
expected to find it. I therefore pondered over it.
As it was evident that the 1226 can be expressed as the sum of
the highlighted 226 and 1000, I now noted that the ratio
of these factors, 226/1000, represents a decimal expression, .226,
that's 1/10th of 2.26, the number that
played the earlier cited key role in my former research.
Furthermore, as the act of viewing the zero-like circle, from the
1 nova event, can generate a simple expression of the
number 10, I knew that the product of this and the cited .226
yields the described 2.26 … but the process seemed too contrived
to constitute reliable evidence! [Note: clearly, for this hypothetical
situation, I am ignoring the fact that light from the crop circle would
actually take a very long time indeed to reach the nova (and
vice versa)]
It then came to my attention, however, that the same act of viewing,
from the 1 nova event [even weeks after it was found in
the sky] the whole formation with its zero-like first
circle and its later, zero-like form [ignoring the latter
circle's new internal details] can infer another simple expression, this
time of … 100. And as the nova was closely linked to the
number 226 [the day it was discovered], as was the modified
formation [explained earlier], it was apparent that the whole
arrangement can infer the factor 2.26, as depicted in the
symbolic Fig. below:-
Fig. 10
My recognition of this naïve but valid way of generating the factor
2.26 interested me greatly [for reasons that will soon be clear] but
I had not the slightest doubt that, if we'd been invited to find it, the
arrangement involved would also embody some form of tangible
confirmation. I therefore set about looking for it in relationships
that exist between the dates that the nova and the two versions
of the formation were discovered: day 226; and days 225 &
243. …
I knew that the time spans, in days, between the three dates, in order,
are primes i.e. between days 225 & 226 is 1 [= 1p], and
between days 226 & 243 is 17 [= 8p], and when I considered this
simple relationship further I realised that it embodies the means of
fabricating yet another manifestation of 2.26. …
The juxtaposition of the cited 1 & 17 can infer 117 and this is
100 more than 17, which can be inferred by juxtaposing the
respective circle tallies in the two versions of the formation … 1
[in the first] & 7 [in the second]. And by dividing the 226 by
this inferred 100, we produce, as we now, the cited 2.26.
[Note: we have to exercise care when comparing numbers of 'circles' in
different formations or, in different internal arrangements of the same
formation. In this particular case, the first version of the formation
had a circle-like rim of flattened crop (comprising discs and
hoops) which encapsulated 1 circle (or circular arrangement)
comprising 22 'tufts' of standing crop. And in the second version
there were 7 circles (or circular arrangements) of standing
crop.]
I then expressed each date as the corresponding prime and checked
for relevant relationships between the two groups: the nova; and
the two versions of the formation. …
It soon transpired that the sum of the 225th & 243rd
primes, 2954 [= 1423+1531], exceeds the 226th,
1427, by a number, 1527, which can be expressed as …
226p + 100.
In other words, I'd identified an intimate relationship, between the
nova's date of discovery, day 226, and the dates of discovery
of the two versions of the formation, which embodies an inferred 226
and 100 - knowing that the expression 226/100
yields 2.26.
I also noted that the primes that correspond to the cited formation
dates, 1423 and 1531, each comprise digits of sum, 10
[= 1+4+2+3 = 1+5+3+1], which can yield the factor 100 [= 102].
And when the nova's day of discovery, 226, is divided by
this we produce another … 2.26.
I've illustrated the respective relationships in the Fig. below:-
Fig. 11
I was now satisfied, then, that relationships between the nova
and the two versions of the crop circle that existed had been intended -
apart from anything else - to highlight the factor 2.26, which
had had key roles in my earlier research. And as the number had now
surfaced in such subtle ways in this investigation, I decided that I
should shed light on those roles here. …
Every crop circle enthusiast will recall the massive formation that
appeared at Milk Hill, on the morning of August 12, 2001. Images of it
can still be seen in a variety of esoteric outlets, including the
internet, and to many people its majestic presence is as powerful today
as ever. But even its keenest admirers will not be aware that it
exhibited a set of simple but pertinent relationships with an event that
had happened more than fifteen hundred years earlier, in a city whose
magnificence and fame had once even eclipsed that of the formation:
Rome. …
The Milk Hill edifice comprised 410 circles [as I'll soon
explain] and in the year 410 AD the Visigoth, Alaric the Great,
sacked the once impregnable city, seizing what some people think was the
biggest treasure ever assembled. Unfortunately, however, only
unconfirmed rumours and claims describe what happened to this vast cache
of riches as the rampant army migrated to new territories, including an
area that's now part of southern France, Alaric having died in the
course of the arduous journey. But knowing that it's a well-worn tactic
of those who wish to keep the hiding place of a treasure secret
to promulgate false claims about its whereabouts, I - and many others -
considered the location of the hoard to be an open question.
To understand what I believe was Milk Hill's contribution to the next
part of the story we'll have to consider the following symbolic image,
which shows a view of the circle, looking south, with the central
meridian highlighted [I'd measured it as per the WGS 84 datum]:-
[Note: the whole formation was actually comprised of two structures: a
small, isolated 'ring' near the field's eastern fence-line (noted and
photographed, thankfully, by Peter Sorensen, but ignored by the majority
of other people); and the main edifice, with its celebrated 409
circles. So the quota of circles in the whole formation was the
aforementioned 410].
Fig. 12
If we now replace the main structure with the number that represents its
allotment of circles, 409, we obtain an arrangement that bears an
obvious similarity to the decimal number .409, where the '.'
is being provided by the small ring that so many people thought was
irrelevant:-
Fig. 13
As the depicted meridian intersects the centre of the main structure
[now occupied by most of the inferred .409] it doesn't need a
leap of imagination to wonder if a meaningful relationship exists
between the numbers involved … 1.851 & .409 … and their
sum happens to be: 2.26.
We now believe, of course, that 2.26 was also being defined in a
Hackpen Hill formation of the year 2013. So two crop circles, whose
respective appearances were separated by a period of 12 years +
1 day [from August 12, 2001, to, August 13, 2013] seem to have
been alluding covertly to the same 3-digit, decimal number.
Indeed, it isn't difficult to show that the quoted time span, expressed
in the indicated manner, is itself linked to the described factor, in a
way that can hardly be attributed to random chance, as illustrated in
the Fig. below:-
Fig. 14
I would add that even when the cited time span is expressed in days,
4384 [= 365x12 + 3+1], it can be seen to relate to the current
subject matter in an illuminating way. … I've explained in earlier
articles on this site that, during my analyses of formations, I almost
invariably find expressions of the number 6371 [which represents,
in km, an up-to-date radius of the planet]. I was interested to
discover, then, that this pivotally important factor exceeds the cited
4384 by … 1987 … which we know is the number employed to define
the year that the supernova occurred, which the Hackpen Hill
circle [Mark 1] was depicting [as Red Collie first showed].
We'll now return to my analysis of the Milk Hill formation. …
If its cited manifestation of 2.26 is expressed in the same units
as the meridian, which made the biggest contribution to its value i.e.
degrees west, it defines another UK meridian and this one possesses an
intriguing property. In relation to the International Zero-Meridian,
through Greenwich, it's the mirror image of one that intersects
not just the region of France that the Germanic invaders had occupied,
after Alaric's death, but a former Visigothic citadel that has long been
linked to treasure claims, Rennes-le-Château, as shown in the symbolic
Fig. below. The enduring mystique surrounding this minuscule settlement
has, over the years, triggered a torrent of popular books, including Dan
Brown's best-selling novel The Da Vinci Code:-
Fig. 15
Furthermore, if we now return to the formation it isn't difficult to
recognise that another, extraordinary dimension can be added to the
depicted link to the French village, and the relationship we are then
confronted with raises a number of very far reaching questions. …
The one feature of the crop circle that most people observe when they
first see images of it is its 6 spokes [or the 6
segments between them]. And even when the fact is considered that
the 1 massive structure is disposed alongside the 1
diminutive ring, to its east, it's evident that the arrangement can be
considered to be a naïve depiction of the number 11, which
happens to be the 6th prime. So no-one would dispute
that 6 is the edifice's dominant number.
But although it's evident that at the macro level the adjacent
assemblies depict the 6th prime, it's just as clear
that at the micro level the number 1409 can be seen, which
is the 224th prime, and this is interesting because
the edifice was found on the year's 224th day [August
12], as illustrated below:-
Fig. 16
However, as soon as it's acknowledged that the juxtaposition of the two
structures can depict the number 1409, it has to be accepted that
the decimal number 1.409 could also be inferred.
Indeed, we recognised earlier that .409 can be inferred by
juxtaposing the minuscule ring, '.' with the 409; but it
would also be true to say that juxtaposing the term '1 point', or
'1.', with 409 can infer the cited 1.409, as
illustrated below, where [for reasons that will soon be clear] I've
repeated the previously described link to the 6th
prime:-
Fig. 17
The shown intimacy between the inferred numbers 6 & 1.409
takes on a new dynamic when their product is determined, 8.454,
because, when expressed in degrees, it has an exceedingly interesting
property. …
When I surveyed the formation, I found the latitude of its estimated
centre to be: 51.376° N. And 8.454° is that centre's
displacement from a line of latitude, 42.922° N, which intersects
the cited meridian, 2.26° E, at a point that is located alongside
Rennes-le-Château. Indeed, this point faces a site that I concluded,
years ago, is the solution to the area's treasure enigma. The
respective relationships are illustrated below:-
Fig. 18
I would add that barely a stone's throw from the defined point I had,
during the early morning of Nov' 21, 1999, a stunning meeting with five
individuals from another world [although they were clearly related to us
genitically] as I've divulged both in lectures and on the radio.
I'd obtained the details of this unique rendezvous - its date, time and
location - beforehand by deciphering a set of ostensibly
incomprehensible texts that had been appearing on the dining-room table
of a Reading family, after the mother, her son and her sister had
experienced an incident involving lost time at the start of their
Florida holiday. Apart from anything else, this process demonstrated
that the methodology I'd developed to unravel the often bizarre letter
sequences confronting me, based on my perception of prime numbers,
headed by 1, is sound. And I employ that same methodology
today when I examine other creations of the described table text
authors: crop formations.
I know then, with absolute certainty, that the crop circle community,
and similar groups, are correct to believe that we are being contacted
by an extra-terrestrial intelligence, despite the disgraceful and
pathetic indifference to the subject that's shown by governments, and
many academics, all over the world. I would add that it is of interest
that, at Hackpen Hill this year, our ET friends tied their extraordinary
prediction, of the recent nova event, with the meridian that we
now know intersects what I believe to be the treasure chamber at
Rennes-le-Château, the very area they had chosen to meet three of the
people from Reading and myself.
I believe they want to say to humanity's inept and corrupt governments
that if the crop circles hold the solution to this massive historical
enigma then what other benefits do they harbour? And by putting the
site's location firmly in the public domain, at Milk Hill and Hackpen
Hill, they're helping to guarantee that any gold, jewels and precious
relics that are extricated from there are used to alleviate global
poverty and suffering and not to prop up a seriously flawed and
unsustainable financial system that's leading us all to disaster.
In the final part of this article I'll show that the Hackpen Hill
structures - inclusive of the one that had appeared on July 15 - provide
a series of links to the earth model I alluded to earlier. They also
embody relationships to the centre of Silbury Hill's summit that exhibit
clear links to their own structural forms, thereby elucidating other
matters of interest. And my analysis provides a remarkable confirmation
of one more of Red Collie's insights.
© Neil Hudson Newman MSc. [Construction Management] 11 October, 2013
Author of: Les Sentiers des Dieux, Pathways of the Gods [2000]
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
