|
A GEODETIC RELATIONSHIP ENCOUNTERED AGAIN
Those of us who believe that most crop formations are the work
of hyper intelligent life forms that are communicating with
mankind will have concluded [long ago in some cases] that there
should be an unambiguous way of interpreting what these
creations are saying, because, if there isn't, the whole,
protracted exercise wouldn't make any sense. What would be the
point of super-clever beings presenting us with images that mean
something different to almost everyone who looks at them? We'd
have to conclude that these odd communicators, who insist on
remaining anonymous, aren't trying to help us at all, they're
merely feeding us material that they know is going to frustrate
us. And if that was true it would be wiser if we all
ceased wasting our precious time struggling to ascertain what
their formations mean!
The inspired but widely divergent responses to this one circle,
published on the CCC website alone, provide a clear
demonstration of the extent of the problem. After all the
ingenuity that can be seen in these contributions, thus far, are
we really any nearer to obtaining convincing answers to
three fundamental questions we should always ask when a crop
circle appears? …
Is there a demonstrable rationale to the formation's
complete structural arrangement?
Why did it appear at that geographical site on that particular
day?
What overall message to the human race does it embody?
When attempting to unravel the meaning of any form of esoteric
communication it's essential that the investigators involved
focus, in the first instance, on the simplest and most rational
interpretation of all the data in front of them. They must also
refrain from making any form of assumption that the context does
not warrant, even if the execution of that assumption would give
the person concerned a unique opportunity to radiate knowledge
of a particular subject. We must never forget that even an
innocent splash of ink on a scrap of paper can be seen as the
face of god [or that of the devil] by someone whose
imagination is unbridled!
Let us now proceed, then, on the basis that our ingenious
friends know that it is possible for any moderately
intelligent human beings, who possess a basic knowledge of
themselves and the earthly environment we live in, to reach, in
this case, as in all others, consistent answers to the
rudimentary questions I've described. And if we fail to find
these answers it's because we've elected to be guided by a set
of unsustainable assumptions - and nothing else.
PART ONE: the circle's physical form
For analytical purposes I'll be using the following adaptation
of the superlative photograph provided on the Crop Circle
Connector site:-
Fig. 1
An inspection of the structure's outer band reveals that
it's comprised of 13 groups of 4 radial
blocks of standing crop and, 13 groups of 4
circumferential blocks; 13 being a prime number
[Note: the radial blocks do not all point to the centre
of the circle but the label is convenient], as depicted below
[where I've gratefully adapted Bertold Zugelder's useful
drawing]:-
Fig. 2
These 2 intimately
linked but contrasting arrays of 52 blocks of standing
crop should interest all of us immediately, including
individuals who know little of the Mayan Calendar! During a
normal span of life each man and woman grows 52 teeth,
which we use for chewing the foods our diet comprises, including
in the West a key nutritional source, wheat flour, which
derives from the crop this formation rests in [thereby setting
the context!]. Furthermore, the 52 teeth are
associated with 4 arches [2 junior & 2 adult], so the
mean quota per arch is the prime 13.
Our teeth quota, then, can be expressed as the product of 4,
the arch tally, and the prime 13.
It's not now difficult to see that the formation's arrangement
can also be considered to portray these specific groupings i.e.
4 lots of 13 radial blocks and 4
lots of 13 circumferential blocks, as shown in the
Fig. below, where I have linked the display to the respective
teeth allocations of the basic unit that enables us to
reproduce: a man & a woman. I've suggested that the man's quota
of teeth can be represented by the radial blocks and the
woman's by the circumferential [using 4 colours to
identify the respective lots]:-
Fig. 3
I would add that two such individuals, in the West [where the
formation appeared], would know that their calendar's quota of
full weeks is also 52, which can be split into
4 seasons of 13 weeks - a relationship that again
links 4 to 13.
A vital clue as to the significance, in the current context, of
this splitting of each 52 into sets of four 13's
can be found, I believe, in the odd structure - whose outer
profile resembles that of a seedpod [which also has small
appendages at each end] - which occupies the central area of the
formation. This 'pod' embodies 7 distinct zones of
standing crop, and their respective shapes and orientations are
such that a strange, symbolic head of a bearded man can be made
out, as Red Collie first observed [Note: the identification of
some of this head's anatomical parts is debatable and would be a
needless distraction here. I believe it's relevant, however,
that few observers would dispute that the nose is the circular
structure near the centre]:-
Fig. 4
But 7 is also a prime number and it is related
exclusively to another prime, which we know the formation
highlights, 13 i.e. the 7th prime
happens to be 13. And this intimacy between the pod's
boldly displayed 7 and the prime 13 is also reflected, I
believe, in the fact that one of its cited 7 zones of
standing crop is split into 13 sub-divisions [as others
have noted].
But within the pod this particular zone of standing crop
is clearly unique: most of its exterior is embraced by other
zones of standing crop, and the number of those 'embracing
zones' is 4. In other words, this manifestation of the
prime 13 is also closely linked with the number 4,
as illustrated below:-
Fig. 5
We know that when the tally of strips in the above depicted
central zone of standing crop, 13, is multiplied by the
quota of zones that embrace it, 4, we obtain another
manifestation of the familiar 52, which could now
represent the full quota of teeth associated with Red Collie's
symbolic head, which the full pod appears to portray.
It's also true, however, that the sum of the cited 13
and the 4, associated with its embracing zones of
standing crop, is 17, which is the 8th
prime. So in the infinite family of primes 17 occurs
immediately after 13 [the 7th prime] i.e.
13 & 17 are consecutive primes:-
Fig. 6
This concept of consecutive in relation to the primes 13
& 17 is interesting because the zone of standing crop that's
immediately below the one containing 13 strips [as shown]
embodies a set of 12 strips … where 12 & 13
are now consecutive integers [or whole numbers],
thus:-
Fig. 7
The concept of
consecutive, then, is being highlighted in two independent
ways in the area of the formation where the prime 17 [=
4+13] is being cleverly displayed, and it seems likely that we
are being invited to ask what the structure's architects were
trying to tell us here.
The answer to this
intriguing question is, I believe, being provided for us in a
typically subtle way - but one which is obvious once spotted! …
The 5 zones of
standing crop that are used to display the prime 17
- and which embody the 2 links to the concept of consecutive
- are, within the symbolic head, almost sectioned off from the
rest of it by the set of 3 circles of flattened crop,
which, according to some, represent the man's eyes and nose
[others dispute that the 2 outer circles were intended to depict
his eyes].
So the 5 zones
of standing crop, which portray the prime 17, have
a special relationship with the cited 3 of flattened
crop, which is interesting because the juxtaposition of 5
& 3 can infer … 53 … which happens to be the 17th
prime, as illustrated below:-
Fig. 8
Furthermore, the
central member of the shown 3 circles of flattened crop,
which seems likely to represent the nose, is unique, within the
group, because it's almost totally encompassed by one of the
zones of standing crop. This is also of interest because
when we apportion values to the letters N-O-S-E, according to
their relative positions in our alphabet, we obtain another …
53 [= 14+15+19+5], the 17th prime …
which seems unlikely to be due simply to chance! Indeed, our
exposure of this relationship appears, apart from anything else,
to be confirming that the circle was intended to
represent the cited anatomical feature of the symbolic head …
its nose!
So if we now apply the concept of
consecutive to the 17th prime,
in a rational way, we'd have to set out before us the
first 17 primes [as opposed to all the primes
between the 17th and infinity!]. And as we
know that the formation's manifestation of 17
itself had been derived from adding 4 & 13
it would make sense if the cited array of 17
primes was split into two groups: the first 4
primes, followed by the next 13, thus:-
1 2 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 23
29 31 37 41 43 47 53
Those of you who've
read Appendix B of Les Sentiers des Dieux,
Pathways of the Gods or, my essay of August 7, The
Recurring Point of Reference [Wessex Ridgeway; Articles],
will know that this array, of 4+13 consecutive
primes, possesses a set of intriguing properties.
One of these is that
it can infer, with simplicity and elegance, a number, 6371,
which equals an up-to-date value of the earth's mean radius,
expressed in kilometres, which is accurate to one metre [it's
actually the geometric mean radius of the ellipsoid
employed as the WGS 84 earth model i.e. 6371 km is the
radius of a sphere whose volume equals that of the ellipsoid].
And as this formation
exhibits - within its prominent external band - two lots
of 52, each of which is inextricably linked to the
factors 4 and 13 [which add up to 17] it's
evident that the arrangement embodies the means of generating
two lots of the described 6371, a process that yields, of
course, 12,742, an up-to-date value, in km, of the
planet's mean diameter:-
Fig. 9
The key question now
isn't whether the above arithmetic is correct [because it is]
it's whether the crop circle builders could reasonably expect us
to be cognisant not only of the values of the cited earth
parameters but also of the described way of replicating them.
I would submit,
however, that it's not asking much of an astute crop circle
investigator to be aware of the size of the planet he/she lives
on. Indeed, I'm sure that a high percentage of our fold own a
sat/nav device, whether as a separate unit or a smartphone
app, and these exploit the WGS 84 system - the ellipsoid of
which possesses a geometric mean radius of 6371
km. Furthermore, the cited way of fabricating this number, from
the first 17 consecutive primes [which I repeated in Fig.
9], involves nothing more complex than addition, a
mathematical operation that even Junior School pupils can cope
with easily.
I contend, then, that
it is reasonable for the crop circle builders to expect
us to be familiar both with the earth dimension 6371 km,
and its double, and the cited way of inferring them. [Note: I'll
be explaining shortly why I believe they had another reason, as
well, for drawing our attention to this particular earth
parameter.]
At this juncture I should point out that it is also possible to
understand why the adept builders of the formation saw fit to
make allusions to the teeth of not just two human beings but
three i.e. the outer band has 2 sets of 52 blocks
[each expressed as 4 lots of 13] and the symbolic
head, encompassed by the band - as I explained above - is also
closely linked to the paired numbers 4 & 13 [of
product, 52].
The truth is that the teeth of just one adult, such as the guy
at the centre of the formation, also embody the means of
generating not just the quoted value of the mean radius of the
earth but also its mean diameter - and to recognise the
algorithm that's needed to produce this number you merely have
to take cognisance of the fact that each adult arch of teeth is
endowed with 6 more than it had previously possessed, as
illustrated below:-
Fig. 10
If the quotas in the respective arches are now multiplied
together - starting with each 10 & 6 in the adult
arches because they are concurrent - we produce the
following arrangement:-
upper arch
product = 10 x 60
lower arch
product = 10 x 60
And it's the case that when each of these numbers is expressed
as the corresponding prime i.e. the 10th prime
[= 23] & the 60th [= 277], the
resulting products are very familiar:-
upper arch
product = 10 x 60 → 10p x 60p = 6,371
lower arch
product = 10 x 60 → 10p x 60p = 6,371
In other words, it's clear that a simple algorithm enables us to
generate an up-to-date value of the earth's mean diameter,
expressed in km i.e. 12,742 [= 6,371x2], from the
arrangement of teeth that every ordinary adult will have been
endowed with - starting from early childhood. It's not difficult
to see, then, why the formation's builders placed the symbolic
head of a man at its centre, and linked it to 52
[expressed as 13x4], a human being's total
allocation of teeth.
Before proceeding I'd stress that I have definitive proof that
the cited relationship between our teeth and the planet's
accurately defined size, expressed in kilometres, is not the
outcome of random chance - as absurd as that must sound to
people who've been raised on the flawed version of history we've
been coerced into believing is authentic. It would be
inappropriate for me to go into too much detail here but I
can say that the Kilometre & English Statute Mile [as we now
call them] were known in the depths of antiquity and are alluded
to in a host of reliable sources including, dare I say it,
The Holy Bible. The celebrated 6 days of creation,
followed by the 7th day of rest, for example,
is a pivotal allegory that defines the earth's cited statistic
with a stunning clarity [hopefully, some readers will be tempted
to investigate this!]. And I trust that you will all now be able
to appreciate that there may be more to an infamous passage in
Psalm 90.10 [KJV] than first meets the eye. We're told that 'The
days of our years are threescore years and 10'
i.e. our allotment of 'years' is 60 & 10 [those 2
numbers again!].
PART TWO: the circle's day of appearance and location
Its day of appearance
I showed, in Fig. 8, that the juxtaposition of 5, the
number of zones of standing crop that are placed beneath
[as viewed] the pod's prominent circles of flattened crop,
and 3, provided by the latter three structures, can infer
the all-important [in the current context] 17th
prime … 53. But it's also the case that if this
relationship is now considered in the opposite direction,
from the top of the pod downwards, another factor, which
has a unique relationship with the whole formation, can be read
from it, with simplicity and elegance. I'll refer to the drawing
below:-
Fig. 11
When we count the 2 zones of standing crop, representing
what some people believe are the symbolic eyebrows, it's evident
that by reading in the cited way [from the top, down] we can
infer a factor, 235, which equals the day of the year, in
our calendar, that the formation was first reported i.e. August
23.
This reveals, then, that this year's 235th day
was the perfect point in the calendar to create the circle
because the number could be displayed so easily on the symbolic
face being depicted. And the lower portion of that face could
also be used, in the way I've described, to highlight the
pivotal prime 53.
The circle's location
I discovered long ago that our distant ancestors undertook
accurate geodetic calculations by employing, not an ellipsoid,
but a sphere, of radius 6,371 km. And although the
respective source texts have been ignored by academia because of
its mistaken belief that our forebears weren't capable of such
feats, having lacked both the skills in mathematics and the
ability to comprehend certain relevant concepts, I was not
deterred from pursuing this line of enquiry. But my long,
painstaking research eventually led me to a conclusion that, to
the misinformed, would seem irrational: the described spherical
earth model is an integral component of the human psyche,
as is the current International Zero Meridian. However,
for many years now I've been exploiting my acquired knowledge in
this subject area, with great success, using it to extricate
meaningful information from dreams and solve other enigmas
relating to a wide range of human activities, which will be
elucidated in publications I have in the pipeline.
It was also clear that this close relationship between the deep
recesses of our minds and the cited features of our terrestrial
home wasn't the outcome of a normal evolutionary process: it had
been executed by exceedingly powerful beings who were capable of
technological feats on a planetary scale [hence our moon's
vital, stabilising influence on the earth's rotation].
So when I uncovered
repeated emphases, in a succession of formations, of both
6371 and its double, I knew that their adept builders were
stressing something of great importance. I also deduced that
they were telling us that, to understand their communications
fully, it shall be necessary to employ the spherical earth model
the formations are alluding to. And as one of the primary
functions of an earth model is to define relationships that
exist between points on the planet's surface I had little
doubt that we were being invited to look for such relationships
between those formations, or, between them and some other
defined reference point(s).
And in the case of this formation, at Cook's Plantation, I'd
every expectation that it was going to be linked to the centre
of Silbury Hill's summit [at the point I'd previously
estimated], just as the others I've studied this year have been
[I've sent only a few of my reports to the CCC], and I'll now
describe what I found during my investigation. …
Knowing that the prime 17 is disposed in the pod's lower
region [as viewed], as described earlier [i.e. the zone of
standing crop that's split into 13 sections is embraced
by 4 zones], I realised that an even more obvious
manifestation of the pivotal geodetic number is visible to those
who have a knowledge of its significance i.e. the 1 pod
encapsulates 7 distinct zones of standing crop and
the juxtaposition of this pair of primes can infer 17,
thus:-
Fig. 12
And as 17 is the 8th prime [8 also equalling
1+7] it didn't surprise me when I discovered that an arc from
the point on Silbury Hill's summit, of length 8 times the
increment 353 metres exactly [measured on the
described earth model] passes through the middle area of the
field that the formation was disposed in, as illustrated below
[after the Note]:-
[Note: arcs from the Silbury Hill point, to the other circles
I've examined, are all expressed in terms of the cited 353,
which is the 72nd prime. 72 is a key
pentagonal number, and the radius of 353 metres, from
Silbury Hill, was first identified in the formation of June 25,
which was facing the old monument, and had 5 glyphs
resembling ogham characters around its exterior. My analysis of
this exceedingly important circle, whose chilling message is
being confirmed by every new formation I examine, shall be
submitted to the CCC soon].
Fig. 13
Although it seemed likely, from an inspection of the excellent
photographs published on this site, that the described arc
intersects the formation somewhere near the pod, I wanted to
know exactly where the crossing was, because one or more items
of relevant data could be hidden within that information [which
had been the case in the earlier formations I'd
examined].
The only problem, however, was that by the time I'd learned of
the circle's existence I'd been told that the crop had been
harvested. Knowing, nevertheless, that it's often still possible
to see, and survey, the areas of flattened crop after that
ostensibly terminal operation I visited the site, on August 29.
But to my dismay I found that the farmer had not cut all of the
field, as expected, he'd just focussed on the area where the
circle had been, together with a track he'd made to get to it.
And it was clear that he'd gone to great lengths to obliterate
as much of the formation as he could: it was decimated. My hopes
of conducting a meaningful survey, then, were not high, but I
soon discovered that the pedantic guy had neglected one critical
area!
The circle of flattened crop I now believed represented
the symbolic head's nose wasn't just recognisable it was
completely intact and I immediately took GPS readings at its
centre and a randomly selected point on its perimeter. But as I
was about to measure that particular circle's diameter, a little
later, I had to abandon the survey because of torrential rain.
By that juncture, however, I'd already taken more GPS readings
at a series of points throughout the formation, and a few of
these were close to the line I'd wanted to identify: the
structure's outer perimeter. But where the line was no longer
visible [and most of it wasn't!] I determined the coordinates of
other points I could see, even though I knew they were located
in the formation's interior.
The remarkable aspect of this partial survey was that the one
part of the formation that was in a satisfactory condition - the
circle I believed represented the nose - had a unique
relationship with the described arc from Silbury Hill. Indeed,
insofar as I could tell from the GPS readings I took [which are
accurate to a few metres only] the arc intersected the circle's
centre, which also appeared to be at, or close to, the centre of
the whole formation, as illustrated below:-
Fig. 14
The actual GPS readings I obtained for the centre of the
circle [i.e. the nose] are set out below - where I've
also included those I obtained, earlier in the year, for the
point I'd estimated to be the centre of Silbury Hill's summit:-
The circle's centre: 51.427751° N 1.893342° W
Silbury Hill's centre: 51.41573° N 1.857473° W
And the computed displacement - measured on the spherical earth
model, of radius 6,371 km - between these two points, as
defined, was [when expressed to the nearest cm]:-
2823.56
m, which differs from 2824 m [= 8x353 m] by barely ½
metre
[but we must remember the limitations of the data used!]
Note: this form of calculation can be undertaken
online or, on a smartphone e.g. the android app
Geodesy by DS Software 2013 handles it perfectly:
select Sphere as the geoid model and remember that
degrees West are negative.
I should also point out, here, that the 2nd component
of the cited expression … 8 x 353 … can be read from the
formation's pod in a way that's even more straightforward than
the method I described earlier of identifying the 1st
component [i.e. '8']. …
It's been well documented that, within the pod, the two long,
slender zones of standing crop placed directly beneath
[as viewed] the 2 circles of flattened crop that, some
believe, portray the eyes of the symbolic head, each contain a
group of 3, adjacent circles of flattened crop.
But we know that these zones are on the outer extremities of the
pod [in a lateral direction], and the quota of the other zones
of standing crop is … 5 … this particular group
also being uniquely linked by the fact that they are the only
zones [of the 7 found within the pod] that are intersected by,
or are tangential to, a longitudinal centreline that can be
drawn through the pod [which is at least as wide as the small
gap between the presumed (by some) eyebrows].
This means, then, that a 3-5-3 numerical
arrangement is built into the display, and this can serve as a
simple representation of the cited 353, the 72nd
prime, as shown below:-
Fig. 15
In conclusion to this section, then, I'd suggest that there's a
powerful case for believing that the circle was placed where it
was because, as I've found with other formations this year, one
of its key points [in this case, its centre] was disposed a
multiple of the dimension 353 metres from the
centre of Silbury Hill's summit - in this instance, 353 x
8 metres.
The profound reason for these repeated, geodetic links to the
ancient mound will be revealed in the analysis I'm finalising of
the ogham-glyph formation, of June 25.
© Neil Hudson Newman MSc. [Construction Management]: 16
September, 2013
|
