|
(C)
odford St Peter
Opening this
attempt at an interpretation of Codford St Peter is a little tricky, as
it had been bugging me for over a week. Last night I sat back thinking
“what have we got here”, this is classic quantum mechanics right?
Interconnection, Super string theory, morphic resonance, Bohm, Alby and
now Escher, what the hell is going on? This phenomenon seems to
be going matriarchal and turning things upside down and now “inside out”
(excuse my Esheric pun), meaning that sometimes-other subjects if not
“all” may be relevant, right? I mean what limit do we put on
infinity.
With Quantum and
especially in regards to quantum perceptions, anything can be
anything in regards to discernment of information, as long as the
links are valid and overlap raising the percentage hit on data, and,
that the relative mind works in strange symbolic interconnected
associations that don’t always make sense to others, until way after
time has passed.
When a scientist
(or anyone, including me) says that something “is” or “isn’t”
and starts talking in absolutes I cringe, mainly as religion suffered
from “absolutes” over 400 years ago, it was called
“literalism” and is now considered fundamentalist. Economists also
suffer from economic-evangelism as much as some schools of Science. No
amount capital letter use or repetition in “anything” will change
peoples “beliefs” if they don’t see it.
Blasting people
with Raziel-like repetitive trumpets won’t change anyone if they don’t
want to change or see another’s view. Native American Indians see lack
of spiritual vision as an “illness”. Where there is an “observer”, the
observer suffers from the same ailment as other “observers” and that is
what relativity teaches me, so I pull myself up as well, and really re
check what things mean and sometimes I’ll retract if I’m wrong, this is
healthy. Someone might think that a figure 8 is infinity or an analemma?
The Prover proves what the thinker thinks, to coin a term used by the
late Robert Anton Wilson. So I’ll give him a dedication this time
around, as we all so readily step on the shoulders of great masters
without a second thought. I personally feel science doesn’t have an
ethical or moral high ground, I say this as Albert Einstein was a genius
but did he have the wisdom to see what his invention would encompass
further down the track? Especially in regards to Nuclear weapons that
proliferate globally? It’s healthy to question, it’s unhealthy not to.
On with Codford
St Bollocks…
I went back
through all the CC’s that had appeared and sifted through other people’s
interpretations and found a few more pearls, maybe... Somebody
mentioned “carbon” in regards to the Poirino CC and I
thought yeh, a carbon molecule
Thanks Hank
Meyer for that pearl…only it wasn’t in Poirino?
I’ve placed
three diagrams for cross reference as the relative illustrations may
show relative outcomes for some, a relatively simple process of
deduction I would loosely hypothesis that the Codford St Peter CC
“resembles” a carbon Atom. Oliver Morel’s shot gives a brilliant
overview of the CC formation with it associated landmark feature. This
feature includes the “embankment” with its “road” mirrored maybe
as the “two electron pathways” that spin around the central nucleus. I
did note a strange anomaly, mainly in that the CC formation the Carbon
molecule was inside out in regards to a visual structure?
Perhaps a reference to turning “humanity” “inside out.
Why humanity? Well we are also carbon-based life forms as most
things are on this planet. I suppose we could interpret this data to be
anthropocentric in this sense.
In regards to a
Carbon atom we have 12 parts in the central nucleus, 6 neutrons
and 6 protons and 2 outer electron rings. The structure with
its roads may even have the same relative distance from the central
nucleus to the outer negative electron field, as per a real Carbon Atom?
Hang on! I’ll just whip out my dark field electron microscope and check
the gap, yep, looks “similar”. Hank had astutely noted that the
Poirino CC looked atomic in nature, which helped immensely. The
accuracy of transmitted information, on any given CC seems important
in getting close to definable outcomes however “relative”. What I found
a mystery was that one of the electron paths was missing
from the Codford CC formation and also they weren’t just dots they were
tiny hollow circles? They could have easily inserted them
into the CC but didn’t? So where’s Wally! I quickly
checked my ASCII chart and the count on the electron came to 14, so I
inverted again and did both 14 and 41. It said “shift
out” with a smiley ) bracket. So off I went in
search for Wally on another CC. Shift out could also mean an “internal”
shift “out”, so anything becomes anything
here? That’s probably stretching the plank string, but worth a stomp.
Below I’ve placed a diagram of
the atomic spin pattern similarities in both CC’s.
What seems
interesting at this point is to mention the Braille like dots in the
Poirino CC, I had also noted them and thought why Braille? Are we going
blind to what the deeper message is here? I quickly whipped a Ray
Charles song on though and “hit the road jack” burst out
of the stereo confirming my synchronicity of “shift out” in
search of the missing “ring”. Jack being a nickname of “john”, I
thought it relevant.
Off to Chirton “bottom”
to look for more clues, strange name? Chirton’s bollocks would have
been more appropriate, given the look of these images below
Yes this
Telophase structure had been noted via other researchers. Some have
stated that it “is” an analemma; I don’t fully subscribe
to this theory as an analemma is much more elongated at one end and it
would be easy for the CC makers to do an analemma shape. If it is an
analemma I stand corrected, although this wouldn’t link with the other
crop circles via an atomic level, would it? And any “absolutes” at
“time” is also a funny area when dealing with special relativity, as
Alby would know?
I’ve already
covered the first link from Albert Einstein’s equation to the Poirino CC
with Escher’s name and philosophical soliloquy in the outcome of the
Chirton “bottom” CC. This shape is definitely linked with infinity and
also Mitosis with a “cutting off” or “forming of a new” cell as in
biological cellular mitosis. This seems to be on the biological
level at first glance and I’ll give it that credit, but I feel
it is a continuation of the “atomic” level as indicated by
the “atomic rings on the Poirino formation and now the Codford St Peter
CC. When dealing with archetypal symbols they are sometimes hard to pin
down, as they are the substrate of mind, which then fragments into or
onto other forms of mind and different schools of thought, science being
merely one of them. Let’s move to another diagram. Here is Trevor wards
amazing diagram linking the CC with Phi and the perfect 5th
harmonic which gives a deeper clue albeit a philosophical/metaphysical
clue.
Thanks Trevor Ward.
Here below we
have a similar perfect fifth in the Cartesian ground plan, amplifying
this perfect “fifth” Phi above. This is Luke Peacock’s below, so full
credit to him, this is brilliant.
I want to place
this next diagram of the “missing” Wally, “electron ring”
pathway that seemed to be missing from Codford St Peter. The double ring
fits the electron descriptor but there are “4” and why here?

I will note that
they look like ordinary tractor marks, the classical double tram track
marks that farmers leave behind. The double rings certainly seem
part of the link.
Is this clue
here of 4 rings connected to Codford St Peter in another way?
Perhaps another ASII code, and if so what numbers would come up? 4 and 0
make 40 right? And using the inversion method of inverting the
numbers as previous recent codes have coughed up, we can assume that
40 alone could give us a clue, however, 40 and 04
gives a further hint. 40 = ( commonly used as a
sad mouth in emails between each other…
And 04 =
EOT or (end of transmission)… is this the final warning?
Is there another
clue in the Chirton “bottom” CC? The reason I want to
include this as a real clue is in the design itself
I placed this
image mainly as I thought to myself, if this “Mitosis” is incomplete or
at the “Telophase” final stage before separation, then there may
be a clue that the final “cutting off” or “separation”
phase is about to happen, and to whom?
The CC makers
could easily have made this a complete chain and still indicated
Astronomical and scientific information we have uncovered previously? I
feel they didn’t use Astronomical information this time, as we would be
stuck on one subject for years looking “out there” for Summer Solstices
and eclipses etc. Yes they might be valid, but how long can we star gaze
as the world burns? I feel the real eclipse is in our
understanding of a deeper message on a spiritual level.
I would like to
tackle the message of the 40 as a “spiritual
purification”, a metaphysical number, especially in light of
other factors. So why do I use this number as form of cutting off or
purification? Well easy, in the west it’s called Lent
and with all the Italian inference within the CC’s, St Peter
(Peter being Jesus’ main disciple in scripture and the founder of the
Catholic church, and also, Poirino Turin Italy, (home
of the infamous Turin Shroud) That magnificent piece of cloth of
a “man” covering his crotch? We’ll never know if he was
genuinely circumcised in the true biblical sense?
Add the strange
name of Chirton “bottom” to this and it paints a murky
picture indeed, especially in light of the current Pedophile scandal?
This is merely inference on my part at this stage, and history will be
the best critic.
I’d like to
shift back to the perfect fifth for a time frame
designator in regards to the data.
One way to
recognise the perfect fifth is to sing the first five notes of the major
scale in solfege: do re mi fa
sol;
the first and last notes form a perfect fifth. Sol is
another word for “Sun”. So is this may be a reference to
the birth of the Mayan fifth Sun? Maybe… Stanley Kubrick’s
classic film used the image of a Monolith in perfect rectangle
measurements constantly in reference to a “rising Sun”. Or birth of a
new era.
One can do
their own research on Kubrick’s use of this image especially in regards
to the monolith used in his film 2001 a space Odyssey, the monolith look
strikingly similar to this perfect rectangle demonstrated with Luke’s
map and illustration below
40
symbolism
This is just a few.
Symbolize the death with oneself
and the spiritual rebirth
According to R. Allendy, "it is
the achievement of a cycle in the world, or rather the rhythm of the
cyclic repetitions in the Universe".
The 40 days of the Lent before
Easter.
The term "city of David",
designating Jerusalem, appears 40 times in the OT.
Jesus fasted
forty days in the wilderness
Noah
and company in the Ark watched rain fall for 40 days and forty nights.
Moses
was up on Sinai receiving the 10 commandments for 40 days.
The
Israelites wandered
around the desert for 40 years.
Most followers of Western
Christianity observe Lent beginning on Ash Wednesday (midday, 40 days to
Palm Sunday) and concluding at the Ninth Hour of Maundy Thursday (44
days in the Catholic Church) (four extra days for the
Catholics?)
40 days and nights Elijah spent
walking to Mount Horeb
Jonah in his prophecy of
judgment gave the city of Nineveh in which to repent
So to conclude I feel this again
represents a Carbon molecular purification, but for whom? That’s where
choice comes in. John Scott
www.johnscottartist.com |