|
A Nuclear Holocaust
threatens
because of the West's
prolonged and shameful apathy
Initial observations
Having concluded that the Wayland's
Smithy circle, of August 12, had been designed to warn the West that
plans are afoot to mark the imminent 8th anniversary
of the 9/11 attacks on the US, of 2001, with another
assault, planned for 8 o'clock in the morning [ref.
waylandsmithy3, it was immediately apparent that the Tidcombe
formation, of August 16, displays this factor 8 in an explicit
way i.e. it's comprised of that quota of spokes, as shown below, which
is an adaptation of an image that was kindly provided by Olivier Morel:-
But it was also clear that the
factor 480 I'd inferred from the Wayland's Smithy circle - which
equals one 8-hour period's quota of minutes - can similarly be
inferred from the Tidcombe structure.
Each of its 8 spokes
contains an array of 6 minute circles [in a 2-4
configuration (when viewed from the outside)], as shown below:-
- and when the total number of
these, 48 [= 8x6], is juxtaposed with 0 [= zero], which
the formation's dominant central circle could represent, the cited
480 can be inferred.
Furthermore, the described 2-4
array of mini circles could also infer 24, and a single
occurrence of this factor was similarly inferred from the Wayland's
Smithy structure i.e. 1440/60 = 24. This relationship exposes
more links between the formations.
Firstly, the Wayland's Smithy
circle was found on the year's 224th day and when the
solitary 24 that was inferred from the formation is added to
224p [= 1409], we obtain - 228p [= 1433] - the Tidcombe
structure having been found on the year's 228th day.
Secondly, if each 2-4
array of mini circles in the Tidcombe formation was considered [from one
perspective] to represent 24 then the full set of them would
entail a total of - 192 [= 8x24] - and this number was also
inferred from the Wayland's Smithy circle: the missing entries in the
arithmetic series that can be derived from the small blocks of
standing crop in the 2 rings, 52-56-60-64-68-72-76,
add up to 192 [= 60+64+68].
But a more obvious link between the
formations also exists: the time span, in days, between their cited days
of discovery, 224 & 228, is
4
and, as again
explained in my Wayland's Smithy article, this simple factor was
highlighted in that structure in a number of independent ways.
Confronted with the possibility,
then, that the adept crop circle builders had invited us to deduce that
the Wayland's Smithy and Tidcombe edifices are related to one another I
decided to undertake a more detailed comparison between them.
My analysis and conclusions
Definitive geographical
relationships
Having noted that the letter
endowment of the name TIDCOMBE, 8, equals the quota of spokes in
the Tidcombe formation, I was curious as to whether this word embodies
any other interesting attributes - and I quickly discovered that its
alphabetical value [i.e. its value as per the cipher A=1
Z=26] is
71 [= 20+9+4+3+15+13+2+5]
which I knew I'd encountered during
my analysis of the Wayland's Smithy edifice.
To recall, I'd found information
embodied within the relationship that exists between the 7
concentric circles of standing crop zones that encompass the
clock face, and the 1 the latter encapsulates; and I employed a
symbolic representation of these 8 circles to facilitate the
analytical process, as repeated below:-
With my attention now drawn back to
this elementary diagram - which can infer the cited 71 - I
discovered that it has a profoundly important role that could not have
been recognised before the Tidcombe formation had appeared.
I already knew that the depicted
arrangement embodies a novel way of displaying the mean radius [in
kilometres] of the earth model employed in the WGS 84 map datum,
but I didn't refer to this fact in my Wayland's Smithy article [for the
sake of brevity] i.e. when the 8 circles are labelled
sequentially, starting at 1, the sum of those labels is 36
[= 1+
+8], and when this is placed directly above the 71, the
factor 6371 can be obtained by reading anti-clockwise from
the 6, thus:-
I also knew that this elegant
manifestation of the key geodetic parameter, 6371, could
be indicative that the figure from which it was derived is even more
important then I'd appreciated, but in the absence of the Tidcombe
structure I had no idea how.
Shortly after this website reported
the formation, however, on August 16, I estimated its centre's
geographical coordinates by comparing a cropped panoramic image of the
area, the original having again been kindly provided by Olivier Morel,
with a Google Earth print as shown below, where the obtained
values are pasted on the second Fig.:-
I now discovered something
extraordinary: I found that the meridional and latitudinal displacements
from the illustrated Tidcombe point to the one I'd previously identified
[also estimated] in the Wayland's Smithy edifice are embodied in the
earlier described figure in ways that are the epitome of simplicity and
elegance.
Knowing that the cited 6371
had been read directly from the following array:-
36
71
- I discovered that the two
numbers' product - 2556 - is the latitudinal displacement [WGS 84
datum] between the two points, exactly, expressed in
degrees/10000.
And having found that 36 x
71 relates in this definitive way to the points' latitudinal
displacement I quickly established that another expression based on
these numbers [but now including their 4 digits]
36+71 -
[3+6+7+1]
yields - 90 - which is the exact meridional displacement [WGS
84] between the two points [again in °/10000].
Furthermore, my recognition that
the digits of 36 & 71 were also used to produce the
latter result alerted me to another extraordinary fact: the expression
3x6 + 7x1 yields
25
which has an
intimate and unique relationship with the Tidcombe formation: the
structure's total quota of circles can be expressed as
25p [=
89 = 8x(5+6) + 1].
The foregoing information is
summarised in the following text + symbolic diagram:-
It now seemed barely conceivable
that this clutch of imposing and thought provoking relationships between
the two formations could embody any additional attributes that would be
of relevance to my investigation but I was stunned to find that they do.
Verification of geographical
relationships
I first noted something that
appeared to be merely a strange coincidence: the numbers that express
the respective latitudes & longitudes - 51.571; 51.3154
& 1.594; 1.585 - have digits that, in
each case, add up to 19 i.e.:-
5+1+5+7+1
= 5+1+3+1+5+4 =
1+5+9+4 = 1+5+8+5
= 19
But when I realised that the quota
of digits in these numbers is also 19 [= 5+6 + 4+4] it seemed
possible that the whole relationship was the outcome of intelligent
action - and when I reconsidered the distinctive structure of the
Tidcombe formation I was left in no doubt about the validity of this
theory.
I knew that each of the edifice's
spokes bears a clear resemblance to a familiar glyph, S, and it
now seemed relevant that this represents the 19th
letter of the alphabet that's widely used in the UK, where the structure
appeared. But it was also evident that this particular manifestation of
S is closely tied to a 5 & 6, the two numbers that
represent the digit tallies of the cited latitudes i.e. the letter
comprises 5 large circles & 6 small. And I realised that
if these circles are considered to contribute 11 to the 19
that the S is associated with [in the alphabetical context] the
remaining 8 could be expressed as - 4+4 - the very
two numbers that represent the digit tallies of the cited meridians.
These curious relationships are
shown below, alongside an image of a typical spoke:-
Powerful indicators that the crop
circle builders had invited us to find this information are embodied, I
believe, in the simple fact that the cited position of S in our
alphabet, 19, is the 9th prime [as stressed
before, 1 must be counted as the first prime].
This reveals that 19 can be
expressed as the sum of its prime rank, 9, and 10
and these two factors are also closely tied to the geographical
coordinates of the defined points in the respective formations.
9
is the quota of digits in 51.571 & 1.594,
the numbers that represent the latitude and longitude of the Wayland's
Smithy point; and 10, the quota in 51.3154 & 1.585,
the corresponding numbers for the Tidcombe point.
Furthermore, we know that 90
[= 9x10] is the exact meridional displacement
between the Wayland's Smithy and Tidcombe points, expressed in
degrees/10000.
If the groups of 9 & 10
digits are now labelled sequentially, starting at 1, we produce -
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 and 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 - and their respective sums
are: 45 and 55. And when these are multiplied together
[just as the 9 & 10 were] we obtain
2475. But we know that each
spoke belongs to a set of 8 that encompasses 1 central
circle, and when 81, which can be inferred from the arrangement,
is added to 2475 we obtain - 2556 - the exact
latitudinal displacement between the two points [again in °/10000].
At this juncture, then, I was
convinced that my initial suspicion that the crop circle builders had
wanted us to conclude that the Wayland's Smithy and Tidcombe edifices
are related to one another is correct, indeed, the intimate
relationships between them that I exposed were more comprehensive and
impressive than I could have imagined. I still did not know, however, if
the Tidcombe circle had also been designed to tell us something about
the planned 9/11 attacks that the Wayland's Smithy structure hadn't
revealed. I therefore made a determined effort to answer this profound
question.
References to thermonuclear
bomb materials
Although I believed that my
interpretation of the S glyphs comprising the formation's 8
spokes was correct I was still curious as to why these structures were
made to look the way they do, and I suspected that I hadn't exposed
their full communicative role. Knowing, then, that in each glyph curved
hoops [which form the S's dominant curves] link two pairs of the
larger circles, I decided to label sequentially all 5 of these
circles that are present, defining the innermost to be the first, as
depicted below:-
This exercise quickly produced a
positive result: when I added the products of the two pairs of numbers
that are linked by the curved hoops, 5 & 3 and 4 &
1, I obtained the familiar
19 [= 5x3 + 4x1].
My identification of this new way
of generating the number I believed had a unique role both in the glyph
itself, S being the alphabet's 19th letter, and
in the definition of both formations' geographical coordinates was of
particular interest to me because it also suggested that we'd been
invited to label the five circles in the way shown, and I soon produced
more evidence that that is the case.
I noted that when the 4 numbers
linked by the hoops are viewed from the formation's outer face they can
be read as 53 & 41, which are the 17th &
14th primes, respectively. And the sum of the inferred
17 & 14 can be expressed as 12p [= 31], where 12
was the number that was displayed explicitly in the Wayland's Smithy
formation.
But it's also the case that when
this inferred 12 is multiplied by the above described 19
[= 5x3 + 4x1], we obtain
228
which was the day the formation
was found.
I now had little doubt, then, that
the above Fig. had been labelled in the way the crop circle builders had
intended - but it still didn't appear to be telling us anything new.
However, when I re-examined the sum
of 53 & 41 [which I'd expressed as 17p + 14p] I realised
that the direct answer - 94 - is the Atomic Number of a
radioactive element that's a well known constituent of thermonuclear
bombs
Plutonium. Furthermore, I then wondered if it is
significant that the four linked circles that had generated this 94
encapsulate the circle with a 2 on it. I knew that the expression
94 - 2 yields
92
the Atomic Number of another radioactive
element that's a well known constituent of thermonuclear bombs
Uranium.
At this point I noted something
that appears to support these chilling observations.
Knowing that I'd already
encountered instances where numbers' digits have key roles in the
information I'd obtained from the two formations, I observed that the
digits of 94 & 92 add up to
24
which can be
inferred from the 2-4 arrangement of small circles [when
again viewed from outside the formation] that, within the S
glyph, are entwined with the larger circles that had generated the 94
& 92. It seemed possible, then, that in the current context
the array of small circles [which also had other roles] serves as a
subtle means of confirming the presence of the numbers 94 & 92.
I then noted that when 31 [=
12p], which I'd derived from 17+14 i.e. the sum of
the prime ranks of 53 & 41 [whose sum had yielded the 94],
is multiplied by 6 [= 2+4], the S glyph's quota of these
small circles, we obtain - 186 - which can be expressed as the
sum of the Atomic Numbers of Plutonium and Uranium
94
+ 92.
At this juncture I decided to see
if the above argument can be taken a step further.
If one of the
covert roles of each S glyph is to allude to the numbers 94 &
92 then it would have to be the case that all 8 such glyphs
would represent
1488 [= 186x8]. And as this number is
associated with the area that encompasses the central circle,
which is unique because it is the largest one in the formation,
it seemed reasonable to assume that we are being invited to consider a
relationship that exists between these two entities i.e. the 1488
and the 1 central circle.
And as 1 also happens to
represent the Atomic Number of the other active constituent of a
thermonuclear bomb - which is likewise unique because it's both
non-radioactive and gaseous - Hydrogen [whose 8 letters also
begin with the 8th letter of the alphabet], I decided
to add this Atomic Number to the sum of the others, producing
1489.
This result was profound: 1489 is
the 238th prime and both Plutonium and
Uranium has an isotope of Atomic Weight 238. But although
these isotopes are not themselves fissionable, 238
positively ties the two elements together.
Furthermore, having recognised that
238 is just 10 larger than 228, the day that the
Tidcombe formation was reported, I wondered whether these numbers are
related in any other meaningful way - and what I found again stunned me.
I discovered that the sum of the 238th and 228th
primes is - 2922 [= 1489+1433] - which I knew to be the exact
time span, in days, between 9/11, 2001, and 9/11,
2009 [= 365x6 + 366x2].
And when I investigated whether a
definitive link exists between 2922 and 9/11 itself
[which in a non-leap year occurs on day 254], I obtained
an unambiguous answer.
I discovered that 2922 exceeds the
254th prime by 1315 [= 2922 - 1607], which can
be expressed as - 4px57p [= 5x263] - and the inferred 4x57
yields another manifestation of
228
the day the Tidcombe
formation was reported.
I'd now
found clear links, then, between the active elements of a thermonuclear
bomb - Plutonium, Uranium and Hydrogen - and the 9/11
that's destined to occur 2922 days after the first i.e. on Friday
of next week.
I've been warning for many years
that the West's appalling apathy about the shameful plight of the
Palestinian people will produce this crisis and I hope that it's not now
too late for a radical reappraisal of the situation to steal us from the
brink of destruction!
© Neil Hudson Newman September
03, 2009 |
