|
Initial Observations and Conclusions
This formation possessed two features that
interested me immediately.
1] The inside extremities of
its outer sheath of circles impinge on a thin ring that's touched in
14 places by structures it encompasses - as illustrated in the Fig.
below, which is an adaptation of an image by Russell Stannard. I've
labelled the respective points 1 to 14, colouring the prime numbers
red, and to aid clarity have removed the cited outer circles [except
those parts of them that penetrate the ring]:-
I knew that a ring of 14
tufts was placed around the centre of the formation found alongside the
Watchfield Wind Farm, reported on August 01. Furthermore, in my analysis
of that edifice I showed that when the tufts are labelled in the same
way as above the array can be used to generate 6371, which is the
geometric mean radius [in kilometres] of one of the world's most
used earth models: the WGS 84 ellipsoid.
[Note: 6371 km is the radius of a sphere whose
volume equals that of the ellipsoid].
2] It was now apparent that
the Eastfield formation presents us with not only the described ring
that's split into 14 parts - from which 6371 can be easily
inferred - but also an even more explicit way of manufacturing this key
geodetic number.
We know that the above cited outer
sheath comprises some 63 circles [7 lots of 9] and the innermost
and largest members of this defined set are cut by the 7 tips of
a heptagram that highlights, in its central area, what appears to be an
image of 1 eye - and it is clear that the juxtaposition of these
three numbers can infer
6371
as depicted below [where I've
replaced each group of circles with a 9 plus an arrow]:-
63
[= 7x9] circles embrace the 7 vertices of a heptagram with 1
'eye'
and these
numbers' juxtaposition can infer
6371
Another notable aspect of this
relationship is that the pictograph of the eye, which provided 1
[the last digit of 6371], embodies an additional link to this
unique prime [1 is the only positive integer in existence that's
exactly divisible by just itself].
In the dominant language of
England, the formation's place of birth, the depicted organ of vision
has a name, EYE, which has the same spoken sound as that of the letter
I, which is the Latin 1 and is still frequently used to
represent the number.
Furthermore, having had my
attention thus drawn to this intimacy between one of the digits of the
all important 6371 and the word EYE I realised that the latter is
also tied in a simple and elegant way to the geodetic number's full set
of digits.
The av's [i.e. the 'alphabetical
values' as per the cipher A=1
Z=26] of the letters E-Y-E are
5, 25 &
5
and the 4 described digits add up to 17 [= 5+2+5+5],
which is identical to the sum of the 4 digits 6, 3, 7 & 1, as
summarised below:-
5+2+5+5
= 17 = 6+3+7+1
My attention was then drawn to a
relationship which left me in little doubt that we had been invited to
uncover the foregoing manifestations of the number 17, and this
simple conclusion soon led me to revelations of a far more extensive
nature.
The approaching 9/11 anniversary is highlighted
As mentioned earlier, the first
link I discovered between the formation and 6371 was that the
latter number can be generated from the arrangement of 14 points -
comprised of the heptagram's 7 tips + the 7 intervening structures -
that is disposed around the inside face of the large and conspicuous
narrow ring that exists*.
Knowing, then, of this close
association between the number 14 and 6371, whose digits add up
to 17, I was interested to note that the expression 14x17 yields
- 238 - because I knew that the latter is also inextricably tied
to the crop structure's identity i.e. the formation was first reported
on the year's 238th day [August 25].
But it was also apparent that when
17 is taken from 238 we obtain - 221 - which I knew was the day
of the year another impressive crop circle had been first reported
the
massive structure [which I am in the process of writing a detailed
report on] that appeared beneath Milk Hill on 08-08-08 [the year's 221st
day].
At first I had no idea whether this
time relationship between the two edifices was the result of a carefully
executed plan or constituted merely a random coincidence. However,
having recognised that it's at least possible that the Eastfield
formation had been deliberately built 17 days after the one at Milk
Hill, I wondered if we are being told that a third member of this set
shall likewise appear on the day that falls 17 days after August 25 i.e.
day 255, which happens to represent
September 11.
Having concluded in 2001 that that
year's major formation - which appeared on Milk Hill itself and may have
been the biggest crop structure of all time - had been designed to
communicate key data about the then imminent 9/11 attacks on the US, I
now felt obliged to consider, with urgency, whether the new oblique
reference I'd found to that sombre date is more profound than first
appearances had indicated.
I soon realised that the
formation's most dominant number - 7 - is in fact uniquely tied
to the attacks of 9/11 i.e. the 255th day of this year
marks their 7th anniversary.
And when, out of curiosity, I decided to determine
how many days separated this 7th anniversary from the actual
2001 event I could barely believe what I beheld:-
2557
[= 365 -
254 + 365x5 + 366 + 255 ]
- which clearly could have been simulated by
juxtaposing the numbers 255 and 7.
A cursory examination of this
number's digits then revealed that it is even linked in a simple and
elegant way to the 9 and 11 we use to define the point in
our calendar [9 representing the month of September, of course, and 11,
the day within it]:-
2 + 5 + 5
+ 7 = 19
the 9th prime
2p+5p+5p+7p = 29
the 11th prime
Furthermore, having noted that 2557
is itself the 376th prime I realised that it's also
closely tied to the very sets of digits whose individual totals had
first drawn my attention to the number 17 [9/11 being 17
days after Eastfield's recorded birth].
To recall, I had found that the 4
digits of the av's of EYE's letters and the 4 of the geodetic number
6371 each have the cited sum, as repeated below:-
5+2+5+5
= 17 = 6+3+7+1
But I'd now discovered the following simple and
elegant relationship between the two depicted digit sequences and the
above described 376:-
5x2x5x5 +
6x3x7x1 = 376
- and I knew that the 376th
prime, 2557, is the quota of days separating 9/11, 2001, from the
7th anniversary, this year, of that day of infamy.
At this juncture, then, I was
convinced that ingenious, extraterrestrial crop circle builders had
wanted to alert us to the now rapidly approaching 11th of
September, but I was anxious to know if I'd overlooked some other
important detail, pertaining to that sinister anniversary, that they
were endeavouring to provide us with.
The four sequential groups of circumferential
circles - and their roles
The 4 digits
5-2-5-5
which
played a key role in the foregoing analysis were derived, as we know,
from the name of the organ that appears to be represented in the
pictograph placed in the formation's central region. It's evident,
however, that in the process of accommodating this eye-like structure
the crop circle builders made some conspicuous changes to the normal
form of a regular heptagram - a specimen of which is displayed below,
where I've shaded the central heptagon's interior:-
On the heptagon occupying the
figure's centre, two back to back triangles that fit within the
heptagram's framework were superimposed, one short and broad and the
other taller and thinner, thus [where the two contrasting triangles are
highlighted]:-
One of the consequences of this
modification is that each extremity of the area that accommodates the
two triangles' shared baseline embodies a novel set of angles, as shown
below, where only one of the two symmetrical sets is depicted and each
of the angles of interest is expressed in terms of α [= 360°/14], which
is subtended at all of a regular heptagram's 7 vertices:-
In other words, four sequential
angles, 2α-3α-4α-5α, occur in close
proximity to one another at each side of the triangles' bases [which sit
on the same line] and this sequence can be read from the group by moving
clockwise from the bottom angle [as viewed], 2α [an
anticlockwise reading being needed on the side not shown].
Although I was aware that the
described four angles are also the only ones found in the interior of a
regular heptagram, I wondered whether the crop circle builders had been
inviting us to recognise that their conspicuous corruption of the latter
figure had resulted in the angles being placed together in the unique
way shown.
Whilst mulling over this problem I
was drawn to another odd fact: the taller of the two triangles under
scrutiny contains, at its outer end, a form of arrow that points to the
area where we find both the circle penetrated by the triangle's vertex
and part of the ring that encompasses the heptagram, as shown below,
which is an extract of an image by Philippe Ullens [some of the
extraneous detail in it has been removed]:-
I soon realised that these features provide the
answer to my taxing question.
It was now apparent that the circle
penetrated by the triangle's tip, as depicted, can be considered to be
paired with the adjacent circle because the latter encroaches on it,
thereby eclipsing part of its area, and within the formation only these
two circles [together with the other corresponding pairs associated with
the six remaining tips] exhibit this property. Furthermore, those same
circle pairs would remain in position if the formation's exterior
necklace of 49 [= 7x7] contiguous circles was removed [although
the circles don't actually touch, a curious track does link them
together], as illustrated below, where I've adapted Andreas Mόller's
original drawing:-
And as the 7 pairs of circles left
after the necklace is removed comprise a total of 14 members it
was clear that the full set of them is closely linked to the sequence of
angles, 2α-3α-4α-5α, that is associated with
the pair of special triangles we know of [one of which drew our
attention to the circle pairs] i.e. 2+3+4+5 = 14.
It occurred to me, then, that the
crop circle builders could have been inviting us to split these 14
circumferential circles into groups that mirror the cited arrangement of
sequential angles, as shown below [where the respective sets are colour
coded]:-
This strange figure now enabled me to make a
cascade of stunning discoveries.
Another link to 238, the formation's
reported day of birth
Knowing that the circumferential
numbers, 2-3-4-5, add up to 14, I was intrigued to find that the
expression 2p+3p+4p+5p yields 17 [= 2+3+5+7]. As described
earlier, I knew that the product of these numbers 14 and 17 yields the
cited
238.
Two additional links to 255, the day of
the imminent 9/11
I also knew that the cited
relationship between the circumferential numbers and 17 [=
2p+3p+4p+5p] enables us to produce another
255
because
September 11, this year, will occur 17 days after the crop
circle's reported day of birth [day 238].
But I then realised that the
circumferential numbers, 2-3-4-5, also tie together the two days of the
year, 238 [August 25] & 255 [September 11], in a far more subtle way as
well: the expression 238p [= 1489] + 2x3x4x5
yields
255p [= 1609].
A link to the mean diameter of the WGS 84 earth
model
Having found the preceding simple
and elegant relationship between the expression 2x3x4x5
and the two key dates, the formation's day of birth and 9/11, I
discovered that this ostensibly innocuous product also has another
important function.
When I constructed the Fig. that
shows the distribution of the four circumferential numbers I had no
doubts that the first in the sequence, 2, should be juxtaposed
with the two circles my attention had first been drawn to i.e. those
that adorn the vertex of the special triangle that encapsulates the
arrow. And I knew that this marks the number 2 out from its three
companions - because it's the only one that's an exact reflection of the
quota of circles found on each of the heptagram's 7 tips [i.e. 2].
I therefore realised that if we
isolate this unique 2 when expressing the described product, thus
- 2 x 60 [= 3x4x5] - and then take stock of the fact that four
numbers were involved in the computation, we can produce an edifying
outcome.
If the circumferential numbers are labelled 1,
2, 3 & 4 they are thereby being subtly linked to a
10 [= 1+2+3+4] and the latter has a notable relationship with the
above quoted product, 2x60, namely
10p x 2px60p
[i.e. 23 x 2x277] yields:-
12742
the geometric mean diameter, in km, of the WGS 84 ellipsoid
An additional link to the earlier defined 238,
and one to 911
Another interesting aspect of the
last astonishing result is that if the cited diameter is expressed as
the sum of its two radii [in km] - 6371+6371 [= 2 lots of 10px60p] - the
digit sums of these numbers are the familiar - 17 & 17.
And it happens to be the case that if we add 289, the product of
the two 17's, to a product that's also inferred in the above analysis,
10x2x60, we obtain another manifestation of
238p.
Furthermore, the difference between
the 10x2x60 & 289 is
911
which bears an obvious resemblance
to the only too familiar expression: 9/11.
A chilling focus on the United States' brief
history
Having identified the above set of
relationships [which I've underlined] - between the group of four
circumferential numbers and the other defined parameters - I was
convinced that the crop circle builders had been inviting us to find
this information. However, as I hadn't explained why they'd placed -
next to the arrow-like structure I'd made use of - three rectangles, one
of which seems to be orthogonal to the other two, I decided to examine
this mystery. I've therefore shown most of the triangle that contains
these rectangles and the arrow, in the Fig. below, which is again an
adapted extract of Russell Stannard's image [with extraneous detail
removed]:-
This arrangement baffled me until I
addressed two questions: is it being tied to the structures the arrow
points to?; why does part of that arrow resemble a sine wave?
Knowing that the arrow-like figure
had played a key role in the process whereby I'd recognised that the
pivotal sequence of four circumferential numbers, 2-3-4-5,
can be identified - after the encompassing necklace of circles,
comprising a total of 49, is removed - I now decided to consider
the possibility that we were being invited to view the arrow's
accompanying 3 rectangles in this specific context.
And as I'd concluded that the first
member of the cited set of sequential numbers, 2, is unique [as
stated above: it alone reflects each vertex's pair of circles] I noted
that when the 3-4-5 sequence that follows the 2 is separated from
it by a decimal point, inferring
2.345
the latter can be tied
to 49 & 3 in a unambiguous way.
The juxtaposition of the number
2.345 with '49' can infer - 2.34549 - and when this is
divided by 3 we obtain the following 5-digit number:-
0.78183
- which explains conclusively
why the arrow embodies what looks like a sine wave: the angle
whose sine has the cited value [i.e. sin-1 0.78183]
can be expressed as:-
360°/7
x 99.9997351%
The inferred angle, then, is almost
exactly 1/7th of a full circle, and we know
that a regular heptagram's tips split an encompassing circle into 7
such equal divisions.
These stunning relationship are
depicted in the following Fig., where, to aid clarity, the special
triangle, in the first image, which embodies the four distinctive
features that interest us has been magnified and rotated [through 90°]
in the third:-
relationships
2.345
juxtaposed with '49' can infer
2.34549
but,
2.34549/3 = 0.78183
and SINE-1
0.78183 is almost exactly
360°/7
My curiosity was now aroused as to
how much the described expression, 0.78183, actually
differs from the sine of 360°/7 and this elementary
exercise soon led me to another set of remarkable relationships.
A 20-digit expression of the sine,
0.78183148246802980871, revealed that its first five
digits are identical to those of 0.78183, and I considered
this to be impressive.
But knowing that the number 14
plays a central role in the formation, I decided to round the 20-digit
expression down to 14 digits and was astonished to discover that
the resulting 0.78183148246803 exhibits another explicit
link to the field structure: the sum of the 14 digits is
63
the exact number of circles found in the latter.
At this juncture, then, it seemed
possible that one of the formation's functions was to draw our attention
both to the angle 360°/7 and to the fact that its
structural form was closely tied to the latter angle's sine i.e. when
the sine is expressed to 14 digits, 14 being a number
that's engrained in the geometry, the sum of those digits is an exact
reflection of the edifice's allotment of circles: 63.
Light was shed on this hypothesis
when I examined the numerical properties of the word SINE itself.
Having found that the av's of its
letters add up to 47 [= 19+9+14+5] I realised that this number
exhibits a subtle link to 63 i.e. 47 is the 16th prime
and 16+47 is
63. But it was also apparent that the cited 16 and
47 are related in a specific way to the distribution of 14 digits whose
sum is 63 i.e. the first three of those digits add up to 16 and
the remainder, to 16p [obviously!], as shown below:-
This relationship interested me
because it isolates the first 3 digits of the sequence of 14
found in the value of the sine.
I recognised that the
arrangement I'd been examining, of 3 rectangles + a sine
curve [in an arrow], could have been intended, in part, to draw our
attention to those 3 digits. Indeed, when I enquired as to what
role the digit sequence 7-8-1 could have - in the
context of my wider investigation - I quickly obtained a definitive
answer.
Believing I'd already established
that this formation's builders had set out to warn us about the
approaching 7th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks on the US, I
now wondered if the cited 7-8-1 sequence relates to
that event in an informative way. And knowing that this year's 255th
day, which marks the 7th anniversary, happens to be
2557 days after the day of infamy, I discovered that 781 is
related to the latter number in a way that could hardly be more closely
tied to the identity of the US:-
2557 -
781 = 1776, the year of the Declaration of Independence
It also seemed relevant that the nation to whom the
historical words were directed occupies the land where the crop circle
appeared.
And I'm sure I don't have to point
out that this simple and elegant manifestation of the number 1776
fits in perfectly with the formation's most conspicuous peculiarity -
which I considered earlier.
The structure's centre is occupied
by a triangle that accommodates what we believe is a pictograph of an
eye and, as Andrew Pyrka pointed out, a very similar type of drawing can
be found on the back of the United States' dollar. But beneath that US
pictograph is an expression of the cited date
1776 [in Latin].
Furthermore, when we examine the
above 2 numbers whose difference equals 1776 - namely, 2557 & 781 - it's
apparent that they comprise a revealing quota of digits, 7, and
the sum of those digits happens to be, 35, the av of EYE [=
5+25+5].
The two eye/triangle pictographs are juxtaposed
below:-
Although there are differences
between these images, I believe we can be assured that the first was
intended to be a symbolic representation of the second, which sits above
a pyramid that straddles the expression MDCCLXXVI, the date I'd found in
the crop circle: 1776.
In light, then, of these explicit
relationships between the two sources I considered it to be a cause for
concern that the crop circle builders elected to link the impending 7th
anniversary of 9/11 to the revered origins of the United States. Were
they telling us that the day, or what it represents, could precipitate a
break in that continuity?
Knowing that any process resulting in the rapid end
of America, as we know it, would also bring about a global crisis of
impossible proportions, I noted with dismay that a primitive but
unmistakeable representation of the word END can be inferred from a set
of images I'd already spent much time analysing.
My recognition of the 3-lettered
word occurred after I'd considered a simple fact: one way of ending a
State is to break it up. I suddenly realised that when a familiar glyph
is broken up, into 3 parts, and these, together with 3
adjacent glyphs, are then moved in the appropriate way a revealing
transformation can be brought about, as can be seen below [where I've
been obliged to enhance the fuzzy arrow head]:-
The first of the 3 glyphs [as
viewed] is a crude but undeniable capital E. The next also
exhibits the main features of a capital N and as such could serve
as a curved version of the letter. Likewise the third could be an
embellished, angular version of a capital D [remembering that the
Latin D derived from the Greek delta i.e. Δ].
When I computed the av of END,
23 [= 5+14+4], I concluded that the concept is being linked to the
whole world and not just the US. The word's end sits on a ring whose 14
circumferential numbers [see the start of this article] have digits that
add up to 60, and 23x60p yields the mean radius of the WGS 84
earth model: 6371 km.
But when I juxtaposed the cited
14 with another number that's closely linked to the letters of the
word END - namely, 53 [= 5p+14p+4p = 7+41+5] - I produced 1453,
which is the 232nd prime, and I knew that the inferred
232 can be expressed as:-
2008
- 1776
In other words, we are now being provided with a
clear link - in the context of a word the formation is highlighting, END
- between the current year and 1776.
I also noted that when 232 is added to 255, the day
of 9/11, we obtain - 94p - where 94 is the Atomic Number
of a key constituent of thermonuclear bombs: Plutonium.
* [from above]
To recall [as outlined in my Watchfield Wind Farm
analysis]: the integers 1 to 14 form 10 groups of primes &
non-primes, and the sum of their digits is 60. But the simple
expression 10px60p [i.e. 10th prime x 60th prime =
23x277] yields 6371:-
10
groups
1,2,3--4--5--6--7--8,9,10--11--12--13--14
of digit sum,
60
and
10p x 60p
= 6371
I thought it was worth repeating this neat
relationship here because I believe it is infinitely more important than
I indicated in my previous presentation of it.
In the renowned opening myth of the
Book of Genesis we are told that each of the 6 days of creation can be
expressed as an 'evening and morning'. And although this odd detail is
noticeably absent from the data provided about the following, 7th
day [an omission that was intended to draw our attention to another key
relationship], we can be assured that it could similarly be expressed as
an 'evening and morning'. There can be no doubt, then, that [apart from
anything else] the author was drawing our attention to a familiar number
of evenings and mornings: 14. And we are now aware of the
elementary mechanism whereby the inferred set of numbers, 1 to 14, can
generate 6371, which truly is related to the structure of the
earth, the creation of which the myth alludes to [together with that of
the rest of the universe!].
The problem with this observation,
of course, is that we've all been encouraged to believe that the myth
couldn't have defined the planet's mean radius, in kilometres, because
the French only created that unit of length in comparatively recent
times. However, research spanning decades has convinced me that the
cited history is flawed and a minuscule part of the evidence I've
accumulated is set out below.
Returning to the 10 groups of primes & non-primes
that the first 14 integers can be split into, it's apparent that there
are equal numbers of the two groups i.e. 5 of each. So when the members
of these two sets of 5 are given independent numerical labels - 1 to 5 -
we know that their sum is 30 [= 1+2+3+4+5 + 1+2+3+4+5], thus:-
The two derived numbers I've placed
at the bottom of the above Fig. - 30 & 6371 - have been
disposed above one another, forming a small array, for good reason.
If we circumnavigate the array in
an anticlockwise motion - starting at the digit 6, of 6371,
and ending on the digit 3, of 30 - we could read off the
number 6371.03 [the decimal point having been placed at the
junction between the 6371 and the 03] and 6371.03 km is the
radius of the ancient earth model I define in my book on the
Rennes-le-Chβteau mystery: Les Sentiers des Dieux, Pathways of the
Gods, Vol. 1.
But when the array is read in a
clockwise direction - starting at the digit 3, of 30,
and ending on the digit 6, of 6371 - we obtain:-
30.1736
- and this simple 6-digit number
provides us with the key that can finally unlock a long enduring mystery
associated with another widely known Genesis myth.
We know that a sphere of radius 6371 km has a
circumference of 2xΠx6371 km. But if we express the above cited 30.1736,
in kilometres, and take it from this circumference, we obtain the
following dimension:-
39999.99999
km [expressed to 10 sig. figs.]
- which is almost exactly 8 millimetres
smaller than 40 thousand kilometres.
And it's the case that the numbers
8 & 40 have key roles in the Genesis flood myth: the
world's 8 chosen people, headed by Noah, endured 40 days
and nights of rain as a global inundation destroyed all life outside the
ark he'd been instructed to build.
Clearly I do not have time here to
present my detailed analysis of this exceedingly important myth but I
would end with the following food for thought.
A globe covered in water, which the
ark is alleged to have floated on, is the exact form of the hypothetical
earth models that are employed by modern geodesists.
If we reverse the above computation
i.e. we start with a 40000 km circumference and find an
approximation of π [say (pi)] that satisfies the following condition:-
(pi) =
[40000+30.1736]/[2x6371]
- we produce a number which, when expressed to
10 sig. figs., is:-
3.141592654,
which equals a 10-digit version of π [but the 11th
digit is erroneous]
Furthermore, I believe we should
now ask whether it is merely a coincidence that this approximation of π
was identified in the Barbary Castle formation of June 01. Indeed, it's
immediately apparent that two other links between the crop circle and
the Noah story exist: the 10 digits of π happen to add up to the
above described 40; and the 40 days & nights of rain started on
the 17th day of the month, the sum of the first 17
integers being - 153 - the day of the year the formation was
first reported.
It's now also possible to understand why the ark
had the dimensions we're given.
We know that the geodetic number 6371 was produced
from an arrangement of the 14 evenings & mornings of the creation myth,
entailing the product 60p x 10p.
But the sum of 60p & 10p is
300
the
ark's length, in cubits.
The difference between 60 & 10 is
50
the
ark's width, in cubits.
And the sum 1+2+3+4+5 + 1+2+3+4+5 yields
30
the ark's height, in cubits.
© Neil Hudson Newman September 10, 2008 |
