|
|
|
The wormholes
of general relativity in English fields?
This Page
has been accessed
Updated Thursday 20th July 2006 |
|
The crop artists certainly raised the
intellectual level of their pictures this year!
One finds it hard to imagine that any human fakers could lay out three
stunning "wormhole" pictures
with such amazing use of 3-D
perspective, and also an
advanced theoretical content that only a few physicists on Earth might
easily understand.
For
a novice, see the entry "Wormhole"
on Wikipedia, and then "Roman
ring". Two pictures
of theoretical wormholes are shown
below. Their visual
resemblance to recent crop pictures
seems obvious.
|
Honestly I did not understand details of
those three new crop patterns:
Avebury Trusloe, Saverlake and New Barn, until I learned modern
"wormhole" theory, which is a branch
of general relativity.
Avebury
Trusloe shows in schematic form a "two wormhole Roman ring": notice how
its left and right sides are reversed, to indicate that two wormholes
go in opposite directions (a critical design feature).
|
A Roman ring with two wormholes
|
Savernake
shows a "four wormhole Roman ring", similar to the one discussed by
Visser in Physical Review D 55, 5212-4, 1997. When more than two
wormholes are added to any ring, the physical system works better.
A Roman ring with
four wormholes
New Barn
seems to show one wormhole imbedded within another, a novel
configuration not yet apparently studied in the peer-reviewed academic
literature.
|
|
|
Concerning these theoretical constructs, Visser commented: "The
realization that wormholes generically seem to imply time travel can be
traced back to an observation by Roman. A 'Roman configuration' was
thus the first two-wormhole time machine constructed by Morris and
Thorne. Finally, the N-wormhole 'Roman ring' can holistically be close
to forming a perfect time machine, even if its individual components
are perfectly well-behaved."
In
summary, have increasingly sophisticated human fakers enlisted
Stephen Hawking or some
other space-time theorist in their
cause? Or are we
finally being shown the
advanced space-time physics of the crop artists?
Which might explain where they come from, how they can know
future events, and how they can
know long-forgotten past events?
In
the latter case, by sending messages to us, might
they be trying to change the past? According
to general relativity, wormholes are absolutely necessary for sending
messages into the past. Tidal forces within any wormhole, however,
might make it difficult for living creatures to pass safely.
First-hand witnesses can
judge better than me, whether those new
wormhole-type crop patterns were made
by humans or some other agency?
Some
witnesses report unusual energies at those sites (for example "New
Barn" on CCC).
A
good test of the wormhole
hypothesis might be to
see whether certain crop pictures can
predict any unexpected,
major, near-future events
on Earth. Thus,
another small tsunami swept over Java yesterday. Both of the
Wayland's Smithy patterns from August
2005 and July 2006 seem
to indicate early August 2007,
for something similar but larger,
if we have interpreted them correctly? A big "if"! And the
current season is not over yet.
Einstein would have loved crop circles.
His 1936
paper with Rosen first proposed "gravity waves", while
wormholes were originally called "Einstein-Rosen bridges". For a
colourful history of this important effect, including its proof by
Feymann in 1957, see the entry "Sticky bead argument" on Wikipedia.
Hope that was clear and helpful. At least
it offers a cogent new hypothesis about the true origins of this
mysterious phenomenon, that may be tested through further observation.
|
|
|
BACK |
Mark Fussell & Stuart Dike |
|
 |
