The connection of 3 formations symbolize the end of
the week!!!
This formation and the formation of Hackpen Hill have been created
in the same night at a relative short distance to each other and are
connected with each other. These formations are an amazing example
how just a few simple circles in connection with its environment
contain an enormous amount of information. This is even more true
when we put this in the history of the way this formation has been
created after the farmer cut out an earlier formation 3 days before.
One might have the temptation to judge this kind of actions of the
farmer, however this event is an amazing example how “the evil” is
serving the good.
The formation has a six-fold symmetry with a central circle, but
actually consists of 7 large circles. The formation clearly
expresses the principle of 6 + 1 = 7. When we consider this
formation in connection with the formation of Hackpen Hill, then an
amazing amount of information pops up:
With the help of Google Earth I first made a good estimation of the
distance of the Hackpen Hill formation to the white horse. This
resulted in a value of 350 meter (max. error: 2 m). Based upon the
distance of 24 meters between the tramlines, I could also “measure”
the diameters of the circles. The large circle turns out to be
exactly 100 meter. So the 350 meter distance equals 7 times the
radius of 50 meter of the large circle of the formation. For the
ratios of diameters of the circles of this formation, the following
values apply:
Ratio diameter large circle to central circle (20 m): 5 to 1
Ratio diameter central circle to remaining 4 circles (15 m): 4 to 3
350 meter correspond with about 383 yard, but as we also find a 3 to
4 ratio for the numbers 288 and 384 and as 288 = 12 x 24 is a code
for light, this gives rise to the idea to “round” the distance of
the formation to the white horse to 384 yards which equals 1152 feet
or 13824 (24 x 24 x 24 !) inch.
I also calculated the position of sunset (usno.navy.mil
) and found out that on the 31st July the azimuth of sunset on
51.47° latitude precisely equals 60° West of the North. The circles
of the Hackpen Hill-formation have exactly been aligned with the
tram lines. However Google Earth reveals that the field has been
orientated exactly 30° East of the North, which means that this
formation is exactly aligned with sunset! I also found out that the
Winterbourne Bassett formation is orientated to the white horse on
the one hand and to moonset on the day of the formation on the other
hand. Actually there is a small error of 2 degrees. However the
formation has exactly been aligned with the other destroyed
formation in the direction of moonset! This is also very remarkable
as on the 31st July, the moon set exactly 00:00 midnight BST for the
given location! The following image gives additional information of
the orientation of the formations and the relationships with the
white horse, sunset and moonset:
Along with the original formation on the 28th July, a tiny tuft in a
circle was created at the edge of the field (winterbourne2009
). As far as I could find out the exact location of this tuft, this
seems to mark the North regarding the new formation (if there is any
deviation, this is small)! When looking at the 6-fold design of the
Winterbourne Bassett formation, it’s very notable that when the
formation is rotated 15°, the formation not only has been directed
northwards, but also to sunset of that day:
Although the formation has been orientated towards the white horse
and moonset, the formation could also be thought of as orientated
towards sunset. It turns out that in that case the formation would
also be orientated to moonset on the 28th July: the day on which the
original destroyed formation arose!
However important also seems to be the white horse and it turns out
that from the viewpoint of the 6-fold formation, the orientation of
sunset exactly differs 135° from the orientation of the white horse.
This might be considered as coincidence, but in this respect we are
lucky that we have a second “destroyed” formation, for which we can
put the orientation to the test. During the period of 3 days between
the 2 formations, sunset shifted with a subtle 1.5 degrees to the
West. However also the formation has a 1.5 degrees different
orientation referring the white horse, which means that also this
formation is characterized by an angle of exact 135° between sunset
and the white horse! The same is even true for the Hackpen
Hill-formation in connection with the line that connects the white
horse with the 6-fold-formation.
This may have an important meaning as the white horse is often
associated with the end of time. When this relationship exists than
both formations reveal something that comes to an end. One reasons
for this is that moonset and sunset clearly have a relationship with
an end. Furthermore an angle of 45, 90 or 135 degrees has a
relationship with the cross and this also symbolizes an end.
When I saw the 6 + 1 concept of the formation, the first that came
up in my mind is the end of the week! This refers to the traditional
6 days of work, followed by 1 day of rest. Although we mostly don’t
realize it, cultures have a strong connection with the calendar
system they use. The characteristics of the divine creation that’s
behind every calendar is one to one connected with the culture that
uses this calendar. Although there are still many different
calendars in use throughout the world, in many cultures there
calendar has been “mixed up” by the week and if there is something
that we can’t think of that this will disappear, than it’s the week!
However, we enter in a totally new age with a totally different
concept of living. This inevitably goes along with changes in our
calendars and even the week will come to an end. I realize this is
an extraordinary “claim” and extraordinary claims require
extraordinary evidence. Intelligences behind the crop circle
formation realize this and this is why there is an extremely lot of
information hidden behind these few simple circles.
First of all, I want to explain something about the significance of
the week in present-day cultures. In ancient times the week was
connected with the 7 known celestial bodies: the sun, the moon and
the planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn. Saturn
traditionally is the most remote planet and is the planet of karma
and restrictions and as far as the week is concerned daily life gets
into a rut. Apart from that the week seems to be unrelated to
anything in natural order. Sometimes is said that the week
represents the period from a lunar phase (for example new moon) to
the next lunar phase (f.e. First Quarter). However the duration of
this cycle varies from 6.5 to 8.25 days. A period of 8.25 days
doesn’t fit in the week at all. However the week has another
relationship with the natural order, namely the so called black
moon. The black moon is the imaginary point in the zodiac where the
moon is most remote from the Earth. The point opposite to that is
called “Priapus” and is the imaginary point where the moon is most
nearby. However these points move through the zodiac. Meanwhile the
moon passes in 27.322 days through the zodiac, the cycle between two
moments that the moon is at its most remote (or most nearby)
position lasts 27.5545 days. So the cycle of the position of the
moon relative to the black moon (or Priapus) equals 27.5545 days and
is called the anomalistic month. This cycle almost precisely equals
4 weeks. This is illuminating as the principle of 1 anomalistic
month equals 4 weeks has been expressed by the Hackpen
Hill-formation! Actually there is a deviation, but it turns out that
this cycle is part of a 62 times longer cycle, which fits much
better:
62 x 4 weeks = 1736 days
63 x 27.5545 = 1735.94 days
This equals about 4.75 year, which means that 4 times this cycle
equals 19 years, corresponding with 4 x 63 = 7 x 6 x 6 anomalistic
months. This is interesting, while the 7 and double 6 are the basic
characteristics of the 6-fold-formation!
There also exists a cycle referring the sun relative to the black
moon. This is a cycle of 411.8 days, but can be rounded to 59 weeks
or 413 days. This period of 413 days also precisely equals 14 lunar
months. This cycle is also called the “full moon cycle”, because the
size of the full moon is the same as of 14 lunar months ago.
Although this cycle has a clear relationship with the cycle of the
lunar phases, the cycle of 4 weeks hasn’t. The black moon is a
channel of cosmic consciousness. However as the cycle of 4 weeks has
no relationship with the lunar month, this means that the qualities
of the black moon aren’t reflected in the society and this channel
closes and daily life gets into a weekly returning rut. How this
will change in new age is the subject of another formation, namely
the one of the second August
morganshill
. An explanation will follow.
This clarifies that the week is not an artificial construct and
there certainly is a divine creation behind it. If this is true than
this cycle can and will come to an end in new age and even the date
that this will occur is known in the hierarchy of the divine
creation. The day that the week will come to and is the same day as
the Gregorian calendar comes to an end. The end of the Gregorian
calendar will be on the 16th February 2013 and has already been
discussed in connection with 2 other formations (Smeathe
and
Ogbourne
). It’s interesting to search for additional evidence in this
formation.
First of all it must be stressed that in this respect we got a lot
of help by the farmer, because what is a better symbolic death then
the destruction of a formation!! It’s also very notable that the new
formation, that arose 3 days later has exactly the same size as the
remaining circle of the original formation. This tells us: ones will
happen the same with the week (that’s behind this formation) as what
happened with the original formation.
As already pointed out the formations have a clear relationship with
sunset as well as moonset. So if the “claim” that the week will end
on the 16th February 2013 is true, then it makes sense to believe
that we can also find sunset and moonset of this date in the
formations. This indeed turns out to be true: the moon sets in the
night from the 16th to the 17th February (01:00 AM) in precisely the
same direction as sunset on the 31st July. As the Hackpen Hill
formation has directly and the 6-fold-formation has indirectly been
orientated towards sunset on the 31st July these formations have
also been directed towards moonset on the end-date of the week.
Furthermore it turns out that the 6-fold-formation is exactly
aligned with sunset on the end-date from the viewpoint of Hackpen
Hill (see red line of image above)!! This also explains why both
formations aren’t on one line regarding the white horse.
Moreover it’s interesting to note that during the night of 16-17
February 2013, in Egypt (the 0-meridian in new age) the moon sets
only 20 minutes before midnight. More to the West in the West of
Meso-America, the moon sets precisely at midnight. This has a very
remarkable correspondence with the moonset at midnight on the day of
the formation!!
The following subject of interest is the white horse. The year 2013
has the numbers 2 and 13 or 2 x 13 = 26. It turns out that something
very remarkable happens when we count 26 x 7 x 7 x 7 x 7 days back
from the date of the formation. When we carry out this exercise, we
arrive on the 31st August 1838. This is rather amazing as this turns
out to be the year that according to a source the white horse may
have been created (weirdwiltshire.co.uk
)! This would have been done to commemorate the
coronation of Queen Victoria. This has been 171 = 9 x 19 years ago
and as the week has a relationship with a cycle of about 19 years
(248 weeks), this is rather remarkable. This gives rise to the idea
to find out what happens when we count back 9 x 248 weeks. In this
case we arrive on the 22nd June 1838, just 6 days before the
coronation of the Queen on the 28th June 1838!! So on the 6th August
2009, this has been exactly 19 x 248 weeks ago. Now we discover a
cosmic joke by subtracting the day-numbers and month-numbers of the
22nd June 1838 and the 6th August 2009 (ignoring minus-signs). This
results in:
Day-number: 22 – 6 = 16
Month-number: 8 – 6 = 2
Day and month exactly coincide with the day- and month-number of the
end-date of the week! A similar joke applies when we relate the
end-date of the week with the beginning-date of the Gregorian
calendar, namely the 15th October 1582. When we add day-, month-,
and year-number of this date and the 16 February 2013, we get:
Day-number: 15 + 16 = 31
Month-number: 10 + 2 = 12
Year-number: 1582 + 2013 = 3595
This is 31/12 or the “end-date” of a fictive year 3595. However it
turns out that this year can be “derived” from the year 1838 and the
end-date of the week (16/2/2013) in a very simple way, because:
1838 + 2013 – 16 x 2 x 16 / 2 = 3595
It turns out that the 9 x 19 years also roughly equal 240 so called
Tzolkin-cycles (periods of 260 days). There turns out to exist a
remarkable relationship if we connect this with the day-number (31)
of the formation, the year 2013 and the fact that the formation
arose 3 days after an earlier destroyed formation, because:
240 x 260 + 3 = 62403 days
31 x 2013 = 62403 days
Two exactly equal numbers arise!!
Also the distances and ratios of the Hackpen-Hill-formation tell us
something. The numerological value of 16/2/2013 = 1 + 6 + 2 + 2 + 1
+ 3 = 15, with 1 + 5 = 6. When we multiply this with the day-number,
the month-number and the numerological value of the year-number of
the end-date, we get:
6 x (16 x 2 x (2 + 0 + 1 + 3)) = 6 x 16 x 2 x 6 = 1152
This is the “rounded” distance in feet from the
Hackpen-Hill-formation to the white horse. In meters the radius of
the large circle equals 50 meter, while the distance to the white
horse equals 7 x 50 = 350 meter. The numerological value of the day-
plus month-number as well as of the year-number of the date of the
formation equals 11. When we combine the 50 with the double 11 and
the 3 days difference between this formation and the destroyed
formation, we can obtain:
3
x (50 + 11) x 11 = 2013
Even the coordinates of the white horse have a meaning. When we
divide both coordinates (see image) we get 51.47245 / 1.81753 =
28.3200002 or exact 28.32! This is a decimal fraction of 2832 = 48 x
59. The number 59 refers to the number of weeks of the
full-moon-cycle, while the number 28 can be considered as the cycle
of 4 weeks (28 days). This also perfectly links up with the height
of 784 = 28 x 28 feet of the white horse. The question that remains
is to what the number 32 behind the point refers? This number is
again the multiplication of day- and month-number of the end-date.
But apart from that it’s 4 x 8 and, as the formation of the second
August reveals, the number 8 is the number of days of the week in
new age.
One important issue still has to be explained, namely the connection
between the date of the formation and the end-date of the 13th
February 2013. In this respect also the distance of about 2000 meter
between the white horse and the both formations at Winterbourne
Bassett is helpful. 2000 meter turns out to equal 9 x 9 x 9 x 9 feet
(= 1999.8 meter). For the distance from the white horse to the
nearby formation we found 24 x 48 feet. When we multiply both
numbers we get:
9 x 9 x 9 x 9 x 24 x 48 = 9 x 18 x 36 x 36 x 36
It turns out that the period from the day of the formations (31st
July) until the 16th February 2013 exactly equals 36 x 36 = 1296
days! This turns out to be 185 = 5 x 37 weeks + 1 day. In this
respect the principle of the Hackpen Hill formation can also be
explained as 4 + 1. This also fits with the 1 to 5 ratio of the
diameter of the large circle to the central circle. So we have (4 +
1) x 37 weeks. What happens when we add 4 x 37 weeks to the day of
the formation? Then we come out on Friday, the 1st June 2012, which
is the true end-date of the Maya-calendar (see
www.33mm.eu/en/end_of_time
)!!!
This period is also a multiple of 4 weeks, but doesn’t equal a hole
number of anomalistic months. However we can also find out what
numbers of anomalistic months fit with a hole number of weeks. This
gives the following results:
1 cycle = 27.5545 /7 = 3.936 weeks (deviation 0.064 weeks)
16 cycles = 16 x 27.5545 /7 = 62.982 weeks (deviation 0.018 weeks)
31 cycles = 31 x 27.5545 /7 = 122.027 weeks (deviation 0.027 weeks)
47 cycles = 47 x 27.5545 /7 = 185.009 weeks (deviation 0.009 weeks)
The last number is exactly the period between the day of the
formations (31st July) and the end-date of the week!! Note that the
16th February is the 47th day of the year and links up with the 47
cycles.
But what about the original formation on the 28th July 2009? The
period from this day until the end-date of the week equals 1299
days. It turns out that this precisely equals 44 lunar months. This
suggests a connection with the lunar month. However the period
doesn’t correspond with a hole number of weeks and both dates are
characterized by a First Quarter moon, which means that the position
of the sun and the moon form a cross. This is an important
characteristic of the end-date of not only the week but also of the
Gregorian calendar. The period of 1299 days equals 1299 / 27.55455
= 47.14285 anomalistic months. However when we multiply this with 7
(which equals a period of 1299 = 3 x (12 x 36 + 1) weeks) the result
is: 329.99995 or exact 330 anomalistic months!!
We still could wonder why the angle between the 6-fold formation and
the white horse equals 135° instead of 90°. We find a multiple of
45°, a semi-square. This can be explained in two ways. In the first
place we can compare the position of the sun at the very start of
the year 2013 with the end-date of the week. This results in a value
of 46.75°, which however can be rounded to 45°: the positions of the
sun on both dates form a semi-square. Second: the position of the
moon relative to the black moon on the day of the formation as well
as the end-date of the week is around 135° (depending on the time)
in accordance with the formation.
Marc Smulders
