|
Important background information
My examination of this formation, which we know
developed over three days, shall provide me with an opportunity of
clearing up a question pertaining to my activities of last year. At the
end of the season I failed to submit for possible publication on this
site my analyses of certain crop circles, even though I'd previously
stated that I intended doing so. But I'd first like to shed light on the
mysterious process whereby I became drawn to the cited Avebury Avenue
structure of this year.
On June 18, the day after the first part of the
formation had appeared, but the day before the matter was to be reported
on crop circle connector, I received a long and intriguing reply to an
email I'd just sent a psychic I have a great deal of respect for:
Blossom Goodchild.
Note: I first contacted this lady last autumn when
I realised that a global event she'd boldly predicted, involving a huge
UFO visiting the earth for another 3-day period, was not the failure
many ill informed commentators on the Internet were claiming. Indeed, I
told her that the information she'd acquired was in fact in
allegorical form and had been designed to emphasise in a subtle way
a date I'd also extricated from that year's crop formations - a date
that I believed was of such importance I would be obliged to tell in
confidence the authority whose responsibility it is to look after
the interests of this land's citizens: the British government [but more
on that later].
As she was typing in the text of her email Blossom
had one of her extraordinary psychical experiences - and she felt
the necessity to furnish me with its details.
The main points she
described, which were in the context of a crop circle, were:-
1 She saw an image of 'stitches' that are
'missing', but are not a mistake.
2 She saw an image of a 'knitting basket'
with 'green balls of wool'.
3 These two entities were linked 'quite
strongly' to the 'number 5'.
4 She saw an image 'as if the 3rd
ball of wool wraps itself around all 5'.
5 She saw an image of a knitted scarf which
'you wrap around your neck'.
The very next day another psychic I greatly
respect, Thelma Glanville, rang me excitedly to say that the
crop circle connector site was now reporting a circle that's clearly
depicting Blossom's ball of wool, and she said she'd been walking
alongside that same field - with her husband, David - on the Sunday that
preceded the 17th.
So I quickly referred to the cited
report and concluded that Blossom may well have created psychic
history in the email she'd sent me on June 18. A glance at the image
below, kindly provided by
Monique Scholten-Klinkenbergh, stunned me:-
Just as Thelma had said, I beheld an impressive
representation of what could be one of Blossom's 'green balls of wool',
sitting in all its glory. But it was also clear that the only 'ball of
wool' in view is disposed within an oval, heptagonal structure - an
arrangement that can be considered to be a bird's eye view of a 7-sided
basket that's filled to its top with balls of wool whose
diameters span the available space.
And what was odd about this was that the structure
shown was not the original one [fortunately, Kristi Halvorson took
various ground photographs of that at 9.00 am], it was what remained
after the farmer had substantially removed that first edifice. So
Blossom had had an insight of a crop circle that had been manipulated by
man, which I suspect is unique! However, further scrutiny of the report
revealed that the real crop circle builders elected to construct the
next stages of their creation around that man-made modification. I
therefore concluded that the latter has to be viewed as an integral part
of the whole structures identity in spite of its unusual origin.
I could now understand why Blossom had tied the
2 distinct entities she'd described - the knitting basket
and the balls of wool - to the number 5.
The sum of 2 and 5 is - 7 - the number of
sides encountered in the cited formation. And I knew that 7 is
also tied to 5 in a definitive, arithmetic way: it's the 5th
prime*.
Having rapidly exposed these explicit links between
the modified Avebury Avenue formation that was photographed on June 17,
its first day, and the clearly expressed description Blossom had sent me
in her email, I turned my attention to the later manifestations of the
structure that occurred. And I'll now consider that which was seen on
the final day, June 19, as shown in the Fig. below [labelled by me], the
original image having been kindly provided by
Olivier Morel (WCCSG):-
Here again there could be no doubt about the
remarkable accuracy and relevance of the information Blossom had set
out.
She'd used the words 'as if the 3rd
ball of wool wraps itself around all 5' and it was now evident
that that very quota of tail-like structures, 3, is closely
associated with a band of flattened crop that does indeed encompass the
basket whose endowment of sides can be expressed as 5p [= 7] i.e.
the two outer [and smaller] members of the three tail-like structures
just touch the circumferential band whereas the outer skin of the
central [and longest] tail-like structure is actually an extension of
it.
And the 'scarf' she referred to, which 'you wrap
around your neck', could now be seen to be a perfect symbolic
representation of the band that's wrapped around the basket and
ends at the tip of the long scarf-like [or tail-like] appendage. This
band had first appeared, in fact, on the second day, June 18, when its
relationship to the cited tail-like appendage was even more apparent
i.e. at that stage the band and the outer skin of the latter appeared to
be of the same, narrow width, as can be seen in the image below, again
kindly provided by Monique
Scholten-Klinkenbergh:-
Furthermore, it was clear that the band closely
follows the loose heptagonal shape of the basket the farmer
created when he altered the form of the original structure - evidence
that the crop circle builders were happy to exploit his modification.
It's also worth noting that our necks [around which
we place scarves] support heads that are closely associated with the
number 7 i.e. a head is endowed with 7 orifices [1 mouth;
2 ears; 2 nostrils and 2 eyes], and we know that the basket has
7 faces.
And it's apparent that Blossom's image of
'stitches' that were 'missing', but weren't a mistake, constituted an
equally apt allusion to the basket that the farmer had formed
without the three tail-like structures it was later destined to
acquire.
I accepted, then, that Blossom Goodchild's
psychical experience, while replying to an email I'd sent her, was
highlighting the curious Avebury Avenue crop formation [which evolved
over 3 days] which she had no conscious knowledge of at the time, indeed
the edifice wasn't completely formed until the day after her
communication. And this conclusion excited me for two reasons. ...
Firstly, I now had evidence on my computer hard
drive that genuine psychics can accomplish such seemingly
impossible feats in spite of their many critics' scorn.
But I also knew from my past experience with other
psychics of proven credentials - including Dilys Gough, Thelma Glanville
and Jeff Glanville - that if they obtain a direct or allegorical insight
of an event such as the birth of a crop formation then that event will
be infinitely more important than immediate appearances indicate. In
other words, Blossom's revelations presented me with the real
possibility that the strange field activities at Avebury Avenue, for the
period June 17 to June 19, were of far reaching significance. I
therefore felt obliged to investigate, with urgency!
My analysis and conclusions
Immediate observations and thoughts
I knew that the two numbers Blossom had explicitly
referred to, 5 & 3, had close links with the formation's
developing form.
Firstly, the basket exploited by the crop
circle builders has a quota of sides - 7 - that can be expressed
as 5p; secondly, 3 was both the number of creation days
and the allotment of tail-like structures.
I was therefore interested
to discover that the numbers - 7 & 3 - are arithmetically
tied to the circles that the cited tail-like structures contain.
The expression 7p+3p [i.e. 7th prime + 3rd
prime] yields
16 [= 13+3]
and that happens to be the number
of circles in the tail-like structures: the two smaller ones comprising
6 each and the long one embodying a total of 4 [ignoring
the end swirl], as shown below [where I've modified the earlier
image I employed]:-
the
formation has a 7-sided basket and 3 tail-like structures
and
7p+3p
= 16 = 6+4+6
As soon as I had juxtaposed the 6, 4
and 6 on paper a shiver ran down my spine.
I knew that on the
formation's final day - Friday, the 19th - I'd received an
email from The Daily Telegraph drawing my attention to the fact
that they were going to include a free copy of The Complete Expenses
Files of all 646 MP's with their Saturday edition. In other
words, I was now presented with the possibility that the crop
formation's display of sets of 6, 4 & 6 circles
constituted an invitation for us to read a number that at that point in
time had an exceedingly high news profile: 646.
And while pondering over this theory another
titillating thought occurred to me.
The information I'd derived from
Blossom Goodchild had persuaded me that the basket, which the
crop circle builders utilised, was filled with wool, the hair of
a herbivore that's known for its propensity to follow and not its
capacity to think.
So were the wise and adept architects of the
formation linking our 646 MP's to the dumb and lowly sheep?
A number I'd kept secret is uncovered
Although I couldn't dismiss the possibility that
the prime function of the formation had been to tell us that those who
conceived of it and built it wanted to stress the importance of the
exposure that had taken place of the outrageous expenses claims that
many of our 646 MP's had made, I felt there was probably more to
it.
Why, for example, was the building spread over 3
days? And why was the form we see - a wool filled, 7-sided
knitting basket [which the crop circle builders exploited]
with 3 tail-like structures - selected to communicate to the
world information that is of such profound importance?
My attention was now drawn to the odd fact that on
the final day of construction the wavy band that had first encompassed
the basket [shadowing all of its 7 faces] developed a circular
profile on the outside [except where the longest tail emerges],
as highlighted below [where I've again modified the former image I
employed]:-
I knew that this circular form has a close
relationship with the 3 tail-like structures i.e. the pair of
smaller ones touch it and the longest one projects from a break in it.
It therefore occurred to me that the arrangement could be inviting us to
consider the possibility that the other 3 that's associated with
the formation - its 3 creation days - also exhibits some form of
intimacy with the circle, and this elementary hypothesis quickly
produced a thought provoking result.
The cited 3 days [June: 17, 18 & 19] were the
168th, 169th & 170th
days of the year and when I added 507 [= 168+169+170] to a factor
that's a key element of a circle's mathematical identity, 360
[its quota of degrees of arc], I beheld a number I'd had a lot to
do with last autumn, during my first interactions with Blossom Goodchild:-
867
As stated earlier, she'd alerted us to another 3-day
period, the respective days being the 288th, 289th
and 290th of 2008, and the summation 288+289+290
equals
867.
With little effort, then, I'd shown that the number
which most people recognise as being closely tied to a circle - 360
- links together two separate 3-day periods, each of which is
inextricably associated with the psychic Blossom Goodchild, thus:-
and
288+289+290
= 168+169+170 + 360
Although I knew that this close link between the
3 days of the formation's creation, its curious circle and the 3
days Blossom Goodchild had wanted to tell the world about last year
could be merely a strange coincidence I decided, for the sake of
argument, to assume that it wasn't.
I was now anxious to establish whether the new
group of 3 days I'd been drawn to, that pertaining to the Avebury
Avenue formation, can be seen to embody the means of generating the same
key factor I'd found linked to Blossom Goodchild's 3 days. But
before I describe what I found I'll have to explain what I mean.
A quick
aside
During my analysis of a preceding formation with
7-fold geometry, the Eastfield structure of August 25, 2008, as
published on this site, I'd concluded that one of its functions was to
highlight the then approaching 7th anniversary of the
9/11 attacks on the US, on the year's 255th day.
However, further scrutiny of both that formation and the massive
08-08-08 edifice that had appeared just beneath Milk Hill led me to
believe that our attention was also being drawn to another point in our
calendar: December 15, which would fall 95 days after the
cited anniversary i.e. on day 350.
And as there was a possibility that this new date
would mark another 9/11-type assault on the West - perhaps
this time involving the country where the crop circles had appeared, the
UK - I was obliged to hand the fruits of my labour not to the intended
recipients, cropcircleconnector, but to our government [as stated
earlier].
Needless to say, those advising this now
discredited body deemed my efforts to be unworthy of even a simple
acknowledgement and I have no doubt that they'd failed to recognise a
simple relationship that exists between the date I'd derived from the
crop formations and a pivotal event that occurred in relation to
Palestine, but I'll return to that matter shortly.
Back to
the main theme
Having been convinced, then, that a number of last
year's crop formations had been stressing the importance of the 350th
day of 2008, in the context of the 9/11 attacks, I
urgently wrote to Blossom Goodchild in October.
I could see that the 3 days she'd been
alluding to on the Internet, in the context of an extraterrestrial
communication, embody a subtle relationship not only with the quoted
date but also with both the 9/11 event itself and its 7th
anniversary.
In my above cited Eastfield article I explained how
the time span from 9/11, 2001, to day 255 of
last year - the outrage's 7th anniversary - is
255 7 days, or 376p days. I therefore knew that the
period - from 9/11, 2001, to the 350th
day of 2008, which I'd found stressed in the UK's field structures - can
be expressed as the sum of two time spans
from 9/11,
2001, to its 7th anniversary + 95 days
i.e.:-
376p+95
days
But I also knew that one logical way of disguising
this time span so that it wouldn't be recognised by anyone except those
who know what I'd extricated from the crop circles would be to transfer
the p suffix from the 376 to the 95, thus:-
376+95p
days
And that period of time
376 + 491
days
is exactly what Blossom Goodchild's 3 consecutive dates
add up to [when expressed as days of the year]: 867 days.
So when the cited '867 days' is expressed as
'376+95p days' and is then subjected to an elementary
transformation - 376p+95 days - we thereby define two time
spans between 3 pivotal dates, as show below [where the 3 dates
are in the US format]:-
And we know that the concept of '3 days' had
been emphasised in Blossom's event - because it was of that duration. We
now likewise know that the Avebury Avenue formation made the same
emphasis i.e. it developed over a 3-day period.
Being convinced, then, that Blossom Goodchild's
3-day event had been intended to highlight something I'd uncovered
in last year's formations, namely, that that year's 350th
day was - in the context of the 9/11 attacks - of some
central but unspecified significance, I was keen to know if this year's
3-day event at Avebury Avenue, on the 168th,
169th and 170th days of the year, sheds
any light on the subject.
I soon found that when 168, 169 &
170 are expressed as the corresponding primes
168p,
169p & 170p
their sum, 2997 [= 991+997+1009],
exceeds the factor 646, which I believed was being boldly
displayed on the formation's final form, by an exceedingly interesting
number - 350p [= 2351] - as demonstrated below:-
and
168p+169p+170p
- 646 = 350p
I'd therefore discovered that the factor 646,
which can be read from the formation, ties that structure's 3
creation days to 350, the very number I had been interested
in [but now expressed as the corresponding prime - a frequent
device in crop circles]. And the relationship is so simple and elegant
it seemed likely that those who were behind the edifice had expected us
to uncover it.
It now appeared, then, that in a formation of
2009 the number 350 was again being highlighted, even though
I was convinced that it pertained to a key day in last year. But
whilst pondering over this conundrum I recognised that the two cited
numbers - 2009 and 350 - are themselves related in a way
that could be significant.
Knowing that 2009 and 350 differ by 1659, I
realised that the latter exceeds the 646 that's displayed on the
formation by - 171p [= 1013] - where 171 happens to have
been the day The Complete Expenses Files of The Daily
Telegraph were published, and it was an email about that historic
document that had first drawn my attention to the number 646!
This intriguing relationship is depicted in the
Fig. below:-
And on
the 171st day of 2009, a day after the formations
completion,
The
Daily Telegraph published
The
Complete Expenses Files of our 646 MP's
Although I again had no guarantees that this
manifestation of the number that can define the day of the year when the
publication that highlighted 646 was released i.e. 171
[again expressed as the corresponding prime], had been
intended I decided to consider the relationship further,
particularly as it's so closely linked to the factor I believe to be of
far reaching significance in the context of the 9/11
attacks: 350.
The focus moves to The Daily Telegraph
At first it didn't seem feasible that any hyper
intelligent, extraterrestrial crop circle builders would want to draw
our attention to a national newspaper even if the one in question had
been solely responsible for putting in the public domain pivotally
important and shocking revelations about expense claims of many of our
646 MP's. However, when I started investigating the hypothesis I
was soon left in no doubt that it was correct; indeed my first discovery
was so obvious I could hardly have failed to notice it.
The quota of
words set out on the front cover of the magazine with the revelations
about the 646 MP's was - 7 - the same number as the tally
of sides on the knitting basket the crop circle builders
utilised, as displayed below:-
It was also apparent that the central structure of
the House of Commons portcullis glyph, placed alongside the 7
words, is comprised of a series of interlocking lines, which is how a
basket could be represented.
And knowing that it was the knitting basket
that has the 7 sides I now noted that these words also embody a
close relationship with those on the magazine's front: 'The Daily
Telegraph THE COMPLETE EXPENSES FILES' has 14p [= 41] letters [=
3+5+9 + 3+8 + 8 + 5] and the expression
knitting basket contains 14 [= 8+6].
Having had my attention thus drawn to this
elementary link that exists between the letters of knitting basket
and those of the magazine's 7 frontal words, I uncovered a
relationship of a far more profound nature between the formation and the
text.
Recalling that Blossom Goodchild had linked her
crop circle 'quite strongly' to the 'number 5', I first noted
that each set of 7 numerical labels depicted above embodies 5
that are unique i.e. the sequence 1-2-3-4-5-6-7 contains 5 primes
1-2-3-5-7
a peculiarity which can again
be seen to be totally consistent with her information. [Ive already
pointed out, of course, that 7 can itself be expressed as 5p].
However, having observed that these 5 primes
add up to 18 [= 1+2+3+5+7], I soon realised that the cited
letters of the magazine's 7 frontal words are also definitively
associated with 5 distinct groups, and the tally of their members
happens to be 18 i.e. the words use 18 letter types
and these form 5 groups of contiguous members, as shown below:-
|
The tally of groups |
5 |
|
The 5 sets of letter
types |
A |
|
CDEFGHI |
|
LMNOP |
|
RST |
|
XY |
|
The letter tallies |
1 |
|
7 |
|
5 |
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
The total letter tally |
18 |
But this extra tier of intimacy between the
formations 5 hypothetical, prime labels, of sum 18, and
the magazines explicit frontal words also embodied an even more
surprising revelation.
If the 18 letter types are labelled
sequentially, starting at 1, the sum of those labels is - 171
- which we know was the day of the year the magazine was released,
thus:-
|
A |
|
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
|
L |
M |
N |
O |
P |
|
R |
S |
T |
|
X |
Y |
|
1 |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
|
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
17 |
18 |
|
Total = 171, the day
the magazine was published
|
I considered it to be most unlikely that the
editorial staff of the cited magazine of The Daily Telegraph were
aware that the 7 words on the front of their production were
tied, in the subtle but definitive way I have detailed, to its day of
publication. I was therefore curious as to why the crop circle builders
had apparently drawn our attention to the relationship i.e. by tying it
so closely to the numerical properties of the 7-sided basket
they'd exploited [which also highlights the numbers 5 & 18].
And suspecting that they were trying to tell us
something I had failed to appreciate, it occurred to me that the 7
words might contain additional information of interest - and a
cursory investigation soon unearthed more than I'd bargained for!
I first noted that the sum of the labels I'd
attached to the 7 words, 28 [= 1+
+7], relates in a revealing way
to 171, the factor I'd derived from the words' letter types
[we also know that 171 represents the day of publication],
as illustrated below:-
Sum of the
7 words' position labels = 28 [= 1+2+3+4+5+6+7]
and
171
[the day the magazine was published] - 28p [= 103]
yields
68,
the magazine's total tally of pages [including the covers]
My attention was then drawn to another aspect of
the magazine's front cover.
To produce a title that onlookers would be drawn to
the designers of that part of the publication cleverly juxtaposed four
white words with three red, replicating this colour scheme in the
House of Commons portcullis glyph. The arrangement was then disposed
on a contrasting black background, which produced an impressive and
eye-catching page - the perfect launching pad for the profound material
within.
It seemed to me, then, that the pair of conspicuous
sets of white and red words was the natural place to pursue my
investigation, and an inspection of the Fig. I showed earlier, repeated
below [now by itself], quickly revealed something of interest.
Having noted that the labels of the 4 white words
[= 1, 2, 3, 5] add up to 6p [= 11] and the corresponding labels
of the 3 red words [= 4, 6, 7] have a sum of 8p [= 17], it was
clear that the juxtaposition of the inferred 6 & 8 could
enable us to generate another manifestation of
68
the
magazines total quota of pages.
And I knew that 14, the sum of the inferred
6 & 8, is also related to the 7 words total endowment of
letters i.e. the latter can be expressed as 14p [= 41].
I then observed that the letter tallies of the
white & red groups are 25 [= 3+5+9+8] & 16 [= 3+8+5],
respectively, which again proved to be interesting.
I discovered that the mean value of the 25th
and 16th primes is
68 [= (89+47)/2].
|
The word positions |
4 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
The 3 words |
T |
H |
E |
|
E |
X |
P |
E |
N |
S |
E |
S |
|
F |
I |
L |
E |
S |
|
No's 1 to16 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
|
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
The No's sum |
136 |
|
Computation
|
467 - 136 =
68p |
The group that seized control of that area in June
2007 use a name which, when transliterated from the Arabic acronym for
Harakat al-Muqawama al-Islamiya, is HAMAS, and I'd noted that
the av of this English word is - 42 [= 8+1+13+1+19] - which, when
expressed as the product of its prime factors, becomes: 2px3px5p.
I'd also noted that a factor that can be inferred
from this expression - 30 [= 2x3x5] - has a very revealing
relationship with the 350th day of 2008.
The sum of 30 & 350p [= 2351] is
354p [= 2381]
and on the 354th day of last year
Hamas ended its truce with Israel.
It was clear, then, that the word HAMAS links the
date I'd found highlighted in the crop circles - December 15, 2008 -
with the day when that group ended its fragile truce with Israel:
December 19, 2008.
And we all remember what subsequently happened in
that poverty stricken enclave: Israel engaged in a senseless and cruel
invasion thereby ratcheting up the prevailing levels of hatred and
distrust of the Jewish State that pervades not just the people of Gaza
but virtually the whole Moslem world.
I therefore concluded, earlier this year, that the
2008 crop circles I'd examined had been giving us all a dire warning.
If appropriate action is
not taken another 9/11-type assault on the West will
occur, of possibly greater ferocity and scope than the original, and
this new outrage will have been triggered by the events in Palestine I
have just described.
At this chilling point I'm almost in a position to
describe what I believe is the key message the builders of the Avebury
Avenue crop circle left for us.
Firstly, I trust that many will have noticed that
the manifestation of the 350th prime I derived from
the title of The Daily Telegraph magazine was also closely tied
to a 30: it was the sum of the position values of the
letters of the unique word DAILY. This tells us, then, that the cited
354th day, when Hamas ended its truce with Israel, can
also be easily inferred from the relationship i.e. 350p+30 = 354p.
But we should now ask a profound question: why did
the crop circle builders want us to know that the information I've
described, pertaining to 9/11 and its aftermath, is hidden
in the title of a magazine that was exposing a different type of problem
one that was associated with the errant behaviour of many of our MP's?
Fortunately, I believe it's possible to determine a
definitive answer to this question, and it offers hope and light where
pessimism and darkness had once prevailed.
I pointed out earlier that by displaying on the
final Avebury Avenue formation clusters of circles that can be read as
646 the crop circle builders appear to have been linking all of
our MP's to sheep, whose wool filled the basket placed at
the core of the structure [identified by Blossom Goodchild's
illuminating experience]. And as 646 sheep are not going to solve
the deeply rooted problems of Palestine, which have been spiralling out
of control since before 1948, we shall be obliged to look to those whose
ground breaking journalism has already slain such a dragon. So the
message of hope from the crop circle builders is a simple instruction:-
* As stressed in previous articles, 1 must be
counted as the first prime.
© Neil Hudson Newman July 03, 2009 |
