|
|
|
COMMENTS
This Page
has been accessed
Updated Sunday 2nd August 2009 |
|
|
Disclaimer.
Given the wide variety of interpretations of any given Crop
formation, please note that the opinions published by the
individual contributors to this site do not necessarily reflect the
opinion of the Crop Circle Connector.
|
To our present knowledge this formation is the
result of this years communication-experiment by German researchers
around Joachim Koch, who - together with his sadly passed friend J.
Kyborg - started many years ago to create an annual design to
"communicate with the real circle makers", they believe originate in
the constellation of Orion. in 1994 they created a very similar
formation very close to this year's design).
While such an experiment might be reasonable if
you follow the argumentation and theory by k&k and o.k. as long as
communicated with the field owning farmer, sadly again (as in
previous years) Mr. Koch has missed the opportunity to differ his
work from the usual deceiving hoaxes by making it clear to the
public that this very formation is what it is meant to be.
As far as we know this fact has been very little communicated with
the crop circle community so far (not at his own website, nor in a
public note to other researchers, nor has a sign been posted at the
field informing people of this formation origin and intention.
|
Image
Olivier Morel
(WCCSG) Copyright 2009
Woodborough and hyper-dimensional physics: are the crop artists
telling us to listen to Nassim Haramein?
A new crop picture at
Woodborough on July 22 shows the classic symbol for
hyper-dimensional physics, as espoused by Richard Hoagland or Nassim
Haramein (see
time2007s or
niburu.nl). Interestingly enough, Haramein is also a keen
student of crop pictures (see
www.youtube.com). If his theories are good enough for the crop
artists, should we mere mortals listen to what he has to say?
“We were talking about
crop circles. If you don’t have any knowledge of the physics we were
discussing earlier, then they don’t necessarily make a whole lot of
sense. It‘s like, ‘Oh wow, a bunch of really cool geometries in the
field!’ But with the physics that we have been discussing since this
morning, suddenly those crop circles take on a whole new meaning.
They are talking about something very important and fundamental to
reality!
Suppose you were an
advanced species that had the capacity to travel across the
Universe, and you showed up on this planet. Say you’re basically
like studying the planet before you land. You tap into the radio
waves or TV, and see thousands of people watching football, getting
drunk, or shooting at one another. When you turn around to your
colleagues and ask: ‘Who’s volunteering to go on the surface?’, you
might have a hard time of finding volunteers! Well, maybe it’s not a
good idea to land on this planet right away. We have to wait until
these people have a little better understanding of how the Universe
functions, and how it all works together” (see
www.youtube.com).
|
|
This formation seems to be pointing at something in
the landscape. Has anyone traced a line from the tip (with the extending
"dots")? Does it point to "Kokopelli Alien"? Does it go thru the "Basket
Weave" at East Field?
Tita Martinez |
|
But when you look on
Google Earth, you can see that it was drawn next to a large, dark,
torpedo-shaped knoll, and points in the same direction as the thick
end of that knoll (where it says
W 1o49’39’’ in the picture). This can be seen
also in aerial photographs (see
Woodborough2009)
Whether such a
strange field location has some implication for solar physics—will
our Sun shoot something out soon?---remains to be seen.
CMM
RESEARCH
|
| Don't know if this will be of interest, but I'm attaching a photo
taken on 22nd July 2009 from inside the crop formation beneath
Woodborough Hill. I noticed an indentation down the centre of one of
the paths of laid crop. Kneeling down this (approx 8") strip was quite
clear.
Penny Thornton |
|
This formation is
saying that all damage or destruction suffered by the earth’s pyramids
due to cometary impacts in the future have been permitted in advance by
the Higher Powers in authority over this planet. In the diagrams, the
pyramid is composed of four equilateral triangles. A black equilateral
triangle would denote a space vehicle. The simple triangles here mean
that the action shown in the crop circle has been approved by the Higher
Powers, with the black triangles as their executive arm. The four large
circles with rings represent impact points of the comet fragments (and
possibly four different comets). At the top, the comet is shown first in
its original position, then moving toward earth, then acquiring a coma
before finally impacting with all its large and small fragments.
The general function
of ancient pyramids was to provide an interface between the astral
realms humans are familiar with and the higher spiritual realms of
divine entities. Amazingly, these higher realms unevenly follow the
typography of the earth’s surface. Places near the tops of mountains
naturally provide the interfacing sought by men and the gods since time
immemorial. But in large population centres the the pyramid can function
as an artificial mountain whose large mass greatly facilitates at least
temporary interfacing. The interior of these pyramids possessed inner
chambers, some or which could only be reached by astral travelling,
which were available only to certain priests and other initiates. These
persons comprised only a small percentage of the total population, a
characteristic of the ancient polytheistic religions. With the later
more dynamic monotheistic religions, involving a higher percentage of
the population, the need for facilities of this kind has been overcome.
However, the
principles behind the pyramids are still valid.
For a triangular face,
the three-sided pyramid is as good for its spiritual function as the
four-sided kind seen on this planet. But four-sided pyramids are much
easier to construct than the three-sided variety. The pyramid’s physical
orientation was critical to consistent, repetitive occasions of
interfacing (monthly, yearly, etc.) implicit in the religion, since it
was always taken advantage of in systematizing (or ‘mechanizing’) the
descent of the divine entities. The particular orientation used depended
upon what direction the gods actually descended from.
Kenneth Heck |
|
|
BACK |
Mark Fussell & Stuart Dike |
|
 |
