Crop Circle at  2009

 

COMMENTS

 

This Page has been accessed
Hit Counter


Updated Thursday 6th August  2009

 

AERIAL SHOTS GROUND SHOTS DIAGRAMS FIELD REPORTS COMMENTS ARTICLES

Disclaimer.
Given the wide variety of interpretations of any given Crop formation, please note that  the opinions published by the individual contributors to this site do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Crop Circle Connector.


On the last two formation of July, 2009-07-31  United Kingdom Wiltshire Hackpen Hill, nr Broad Hinton and 2009-07-31  United Kingdom Wiltshire Winterbourne Bassett (2), both design are related with formation from 2009-04-24  United Kingdom Wiltshire Morgan’s Hill, near to Devizes. This is what I called PMS or Protective Magnetic Shield. I would say that there is a relation in the activation of PMS: Hackpen Hill shows basic structures and distance from Earth. The Magnetosphere is located between 500 and 60.000 kilometres around The Earth. Diameter of Earth is 12,756 km and the distance from Earth to PMS is 2 x 12,756 (at the Hackpen Hill formation)  , PMS is located at about 25,512 kilometres that is about half of the distance of Magnetosphere. That distance is impossible to see something at naked eye. To have an idea of the distance, the biggest object man-made in space is The International Space Station and is approximately 220 miles (354 km) from earth at any given time and in some clear nights you barely can see it as a moving dot in sky. The second formation, Winterbourne Bassett, is a compose design of The Sun and The Earth surrounded by PMS and show the reach area of PMS: more than half of the distance from Earth to Sun. More information at

http://www.youtube.com/user/Is2012TheDate

Pablo Olivares


With regard to the circle that appeared at Hackpen Hill, nr Broad Hinton, Wiltshire (reported on 31st of July), I have the following Observations to offer:

This seems to be yet a further example providing a simple means of Squaring the Circle. As the accompanying graphic will show, the large central circle exactly fits into the overall diameter 5 times. More important however, the smaller circle (inscribed four times around the circumference) exactly fits the overall diameter 7 times. (The proportion of the larger to the smaller is therefore 7/5). If we regard the overall radius of the formation to equal 1, then the overall circumference will be equal to 2*pi.

If the overall radius (as displayed by the upper vertical axis) is now divided into 7 smaller circles (shown here in orange), each of these 7 smaller circles = 1/7 of the radius. If the value of the radius itself is counted as being equal to 1, then each of these small circles will have a value of (1/7)*1. Moving upwards from the centre, if small circle number 6 is bisected (i.e. subdivided into two smaller circles), then the distance from the centre of the formation to this point of bisection will equal 5.5/7 of the overall radius.

Now if a square is drawn where the top face cuts this point of bisection, we find that half of one side of the square will be equal to 5.5 of the seven small-circle diameters. This means that two whole sides of the square will now be equal to 22/7, and therefore all four sides will be equal to 2*(22/7), thereby equalling 2*pi, being also the value of the radius of the large circle.

It is not, of course, completely accurate (3.1429 as opposed to 3.14159), but is the nearest achievable through simple geometry.

Roger Wibberley


AERIAL SHOTS GROUND SHOTS DIAGRAMS FIELD REPORTS COMMENTS ARTICLES

BACK

  
Mark Fussell & Stuart Dike