|
|
|
Avebury Manor, nr Avebury, Wiltshire. Reported 15th July.
Map Ref:
Updated Thursday 7th August 2008 |
|
| AERIAL SHOTS |
GROUND SHOTS |
DIAGRAMS |
FIELD REPORTS |
ARTICLES |
Copyright -
www.temporarytemples.co.uk 2008
Image Lucy
Pringle Copyright 2008
Images Nick Nicholson Copyright 2008
Copyright -
www.temporarytemples.co.uk 2008
I was in the Avebury 2012 formation the other
day, and when I came to the Earth I was puzzled to find an off
centre standing tuft, so small (about a foot) that it is
virtually invisible in all the aerial photos.
I tried to take shots of it on the ground,
but since I forgot to bring my camera pole (idiot!) I was unable
to put the camera up high enough to get the entire Earth and
moon in the frame.
But I DO have an aerial shot (which I had
previously not even looked closely at because the aircraft's
tire is in the frame) which is zoomed in enough to show the Moon
(?) detail.
What intrigues me is that the tuft is off
centre. Given the unquestionable 2012 symbolism, if the dot was
in the middle I'd say it just meant, "this is your planet." But
it's off to one side -- so I'm guessing the moon is passing over
the Earth.
I wonder if your eclipse expert, "Red Collie"
can make anything of it? This might be just the clue that's
needed to pin down the exact date.
Peter Sorensen |
Image Peter
Sorensen Copyright 2008
This morning my friend Dr. Simeon Hein called
to tell me that he had taken Ron Russell's tour to Avebury in
the morning, and discovered a new crop formation adjacent to the
North-West quadrant of the henge. Normally I would have
immediately gone to have a look, as Avebury is close by, but I
was tired from a late night, and just stayed in bed working on
Email.
But then around noon my pilot, Dai Dobbs,
wrote to say that he had bought a new 3-axis micro-light
aircraft, and would I like to go for a cruse -- oh, boy, WOULD
I?!
So soon we were headed for the new circle,
and got good shots.
The new formation is obviously a diagrammatic
representation of the Sun and planets (with no care for proper
astronomical proportions). But the smaller inner ones (Mercury,
Venus, Earth and Mars) are clearly delineated from the giant
outer ones (Jupiter, Saturn Uranus and Neptune).
And there is a huge Sun with an unusual
reversing swirl lay.
As for Pluto, is it another small planet and
displayed the same as the little inner ones, with a small size
and thin orbital line. I also know enough to recognize that
it's orbit is symbolically correct in that it goes well outside
of Neptune’s path for most of the way, but for a while it is
within the Sea God's orbit (note the upper left hand part).
I have an astronomer friend who I asked to
check the planetary positions, but he said they do not match the
present time.
Peter Sorensen |
http://www.cropcircle-archive.com
Click on Thumbnails to enlarge
Images Michael Murray Copyright 2008
Images Gary King -
WCCSG Copyright 2008
|
The crop circle formation at Avebury Manor seems
to depict our solar-system (not in proportional scale) on December
21, (+/-) 2012 - the highly debated end of the Mayan calendar (or at least
one of the most prominent interpretations of that date). Whatever
this means and who-or-whatever created this crop circle, I do not
know - but the basic message of it is quite clear.
Andreas Müller
www.kornkreise-forschung.de
www.cropcirclescience.org |
|
Diagram
Tommy Borms Copyright 2008
Avebury Manor of July 15,
2008 reminds us that the Mayan Long Count calendar will end
on December 23, 2012: by showing precise orbital locations
for all nine planets of our solar system on that date,
plus an accurate elliptical orbit for Pluto
The 5125-year Mayan Long
count calendar will end on December 22-23, 2012. Given the
long period of time which it represents, all nine planets of
our solar system need to be shown in order to mark its end
uniquely. Such a clever astronomical diagram was shown
at Avebury Manor on July 15, 2008. All nine planets appear
there precisely as they will be located in space four and
one-half years from now on December 23, 2012, with one
exception.
Thus, the outermost planet Pluto
has been drawn
in this new crop picture
somewhat further to the right (or closer to Neptune) than
should be the case. Yet Pluto still seems to be located
correctly relative to the crossover
of its highly elliptical orbit with
the orbit of Neptune.
Three weeks ago at Secklendorf in Germany, two different
dates from the year 2012 were indicated astronomically in a
crop picture, one of which (December 21, 2012) was
essentially the same as that shown here (see
HERE).
Many
people believe that the Mayan Long Count calendar will
end precisely on December 21, 2012. Yet a new crop
picture from Avebury Manor shows planetary positions
that match more closely December 23-24 than December 21.
To be specific, Venus and Mercury will lie almost
directly in line with the Sun
on December 21, whereas on December 23-24, Mercury will
lie a little ahead of Venus as
shown (see HERE).
Since we are obtaining such new information
directly "from the horse's mouth", I thought it more
advisable to report the astronomical date they are
actually showing us, rather than any
preconceived date of our own. For example, modern
scholars remain uncertain by two full days, whether
the Long Count calendar began on August 11,12 or 13,
3114 BC (see
HERE or
HERE).
Crop swirls within its
central "Sun" tell us which way the planets are moving!
RED COLLIE |
Diagram
Bertold Zugelder Copyright 2008
COMMENTS
|
This Dec. 21, 2012 formation suffers from a number of defects.
First, the sun appears in the diagrams as a black circle. As a
radiating body, it is always shown as a ring in authentic
circles. Second, the four inner planets appear as a black circle
surrounded by a ring, perhaps to indicate solid bodies
surrounded by an atmosphere. Planets are never shown this way in
other circles unless, as in the case of the earth, a comet
strike is planned. Only the earth, moon and sun will be hit
according to other formations. Third, Pluto is shown as a ring
like the other outer planets when it should be depicted the same
way as the inner planets. Fourth, the formation contains too
much information to simply specify a date. Genuine circles
always contain less information than needed to be specific. The
prior dated crop circle, T367, for example, left out planet
earth. The meaning of the formation, ignoring its man made
origin, is that some meaningful change of a permanent nature
will occur within the solar system on that date.
Ken Heck |
http://www.nyakonakar.com
|
Please find photo attachment of our revisit
to Avebury Manor. Just as we were admiring how carefully this
circle has been created, leaving the flowering plant in the
centre intact a light orb appeared by our feet !!! Were we just
seeing things or this this quite a common report ? Made our day
anyway...
Andrew Pyrka (Cheltenham) |
I was just
thinking, that weird triangle formation that you saw going
from one formation to the flower of life. It reminds me of
the the way the grid/leylines are laid out on the planet.
Triangles of various sizes and shapes. I can't think of
anything else that it would represent right now.
This
appears to me as a "golden ratio" attempt, utilizing
The Fibonacci
numbers to create a
"golden spiral" or a "Fibonacci
spiral" amongst
the planets, If you look carefully, you will easily
notice the "decent" of the furthest planet, making its
way down to a perfect spiral toward to the centre of the
circle.
Apollo
Andy Fowlds
For those trying to figure out what date is being depicted
in the recent July 14, 2008 "solar system" crop circle at
Avebury Manor, here is a very helpful site:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/cgi-bin/Solar
You can plug in any date and it will show you a picture of
where the planets are. The general diagram is identical to
the one in the crop circle, but so far I have been unable to
get the planets to line up in the same positions as the crop
circle. 2011 does not work, for example, but it is close.
Maybe someone else will have better luck.
Charles Montgomery
Here is what we did with the last Solar System crop circle,
T367
http://www.barry.warmkessel.com/barry/2008impact.html
THE 2008 IMPACT THREAT T367 seems to be a
valid alien crop circle because.
1. The planets orbits are not circular
2. The offset of the Sun from the centre of the circle is in the
right direction for our suspected dark star.
3. The grapeshot meteors/comets have fragments leading and
trailing them and these fragments (fireballs) impacted
earth at the proper date/position in Earth's orbit. Intense
fireball count from the broken comet were observed to begin in
2007, on about 11 August as predicted. See:
HERE
The July 2008 data is just coming in. It shows activity at the
predicted times, but no impacts so far. See:
HERE
I need a vertical shot of then 15 July crop circle, but the
Mayan calendar date is well known. Is there anything else on
this circle that is new or unusual? Like the Grapeshot in T367?
If there is no new testable information, this crop circle may be
a fraud. But it looks pretty well made.
Barry Warmkessel
Did anyone tell you that the new crop
circle at Avebury Manor (15th July) gives the exact
planetary positions for December 21. 2012: The end of the
Mayan Calendar, and the start of the new cycle.
There is only one planet placed
wrongly in the formation; Pluto is 30ª to close to
Neptune. But even the planetoid Chiron is there close to
Neptune, between the circles of Uranus and Saturn.
Astrologers will notice all the good aspects to Earth
from the other planets
Click on thumbnail to enlarge
Øivind Westby
I have a theory... regarding:
Avebury Manor, nr Avebury, Wiltshire. Reported 15th July. In
the little report regarding this circle it says "Thus, the
outermost planet Pluto has been drawn in this new crop picture
somewhat further to the right (or closer to Neptune) than should
be the case." no one seems to have thought why?
while is was reading this:
Barbury Castle, nr Wroughton, Wiltshire. Reported 1st June. it
hit me!!!! Pluto's orbit may have been altered due to the
passing of a large body! Nibiru! it could also explain why its
orbit is already so strange (Nibiru has come before). Is
there any way you guys can pursue this or is there any contacts
you can give me (astrophysists and such) so I can research it
further.... surely a simulation can confirm this??! if so, I
believe the evidence of another planet is indeed very hard to
deny. Stephen Paoli
2012 Crop Circle (July 15,
2008)
An interesting crop circle appeared July 15,
2008 that has the position of the planets around Dec 21, 2012.
This crop circle appeared on 9 AHAU in the Mayan Tzolkin
calendar and thus has a connection to the 4 AHAU that our cycle
ends on Winter Solstice 2012.
This crop circles appeared on Mayan longcount 12.19.15.9.0
exactly 1620 days before longcount 13.0.0.0.0 (winter solstice
2012)
This gap of 1620 days would be significant to Mayans because
they often looked at the gap between two dates. This gap of 1620
days is 6 complete Tzolkin cycles plus 60 days (260 x 6) + 60 =
1620
The 6 complete Tzolkin cycles might have several meanings but
the simplest and most direct is the 6th Mayan glyph of CIMI
which relates to death and transformation. This is exactly what
will be happening on the Winter Solstice 2012 the death of a 13
Baktun cycle and transformation into a new cycle that some call
the "6th Sun".
But remember (260 x 6) + 60 = 1620, what about the 60?
60 would relate to the Mayan leader of Palenque "Pakal" whose
famous tomb lid is one of the most recognized piece of Mayan
art. Pakal was born on kin 60 in the Mayan Tzolkin also called 8
AHAU.
Pakal's birth of 8 AHAU has an obvious relation to the 9
AHAU on which this crop circle appeared.
And when Pakal's birth and this crop circle's appearance are
united it also points to Winter solstice 2012. Pakal's birth was
8 AHAU (kin 60) in the Mayan Tzolkin and this crop circle
appeared on 9 AHAU (kin 100) in the Mayan Tzolkin and when
united we find:
kin 60 + kin 100 = kin 160
What is kin 160 in the Mayan Tzolkin?
Kin 160 is 4 AHAU which occurs on Dec. 21, 2012
This indicates there is some
important connection between Pakal the Mayan leader of Palenque
and the end of the 13 Baktun cycle on the Winter solstice of
2012. The important connection is written on Pakal's tomb lid at
the Temple of Inscriptions at Palenque and hopefully Mayan
leader Don Alejandro Cirilo Perez Oxlaj (Wandering
Wolf) can explain the message of Pakal's lid.
o
o o Blessings - Mark
The planetary glyph depicted seems to show a
date of approximately 15 September this year (2008). I arrived
at this estimate using "Solar System Live" software freely
available on the net. i tried many combinations and this date
seemed to give the closest approximation. I used the "Real"
Orbits attribute. You may want to try this yourself. Since I'm
not an expert at astronomy, this estimate may not be valid, but
I believe it is close. I'd be interested in finding out what the
"experts" come up with. UPDATE
Thank you. After reading the other entries regarding the date
as being 22 / 23 December 2012, I believe that they are correct,
and I am wrong. I plugged the 22 December date into the
astronomy software and the positions seem to be closer to the
glyph than the date I had mentioned. It's tricky looking at the
plotted planetary positions that the software shows and
comparing it with the glyph. Thanks again and apologies for
getting it wrong. Norberto Pellicci
I was reading the post about the new crop
circle that points to December 12, 2012 and was wondering if
anyone has done any calculations to include "planet x" of
which there is growing controversy and discussion?
Zechariah Stitchin writes about it in his series of books,
but also some discoveries recently indicate that there is a
distant star/planet with an elliptical orbit that is
predicted to enter our solar system. The theory is that it
does so every so many years and 2012 has been name as a
particular year when this star or planet will be closest to
the earth? At any rate it would be interesting to see what
the graphs show including this theorized planet and
subsequent re-entering of our solar system.
Tim Hill |
| AERIAL SHOTS |
GROUND SHOTS |
DIAGRAMS |
FIELD REPORTS |
ARTICLES |
|
|
BACK |
Mark Fussell & Stuart Dike |
|
|
