|
Great Expectations: Spinning Top at
All Cannings, nr Devizes, June 30, 2008
This
fantastic and playful formation could be dubbed the ‘Pregnant Spinning
Top’! It brings to my mind ideas ranging from an actual spinning top,
to the precession of the equinoxes, on to the ancient ‘Venus’ sculptures
documenting a lost way of knowing, as well as the monochord theory of
the harmony of the spheres. How can one symbol, gigantic as it may be,
carry so much meaningful content? It is ingenious and probably there is
even more information to be discovered when closer mathematical and
scientific exploration is applied to this formation of June 30, 2008 at
All Cannings, nr Devizes. For my part, I can only discuss what I
perceive from the symbolic and historical/cultural point of view…
The first
point is just simple observation of the design through description:
This crop
circle presents as a ‘diamond/square’, in which two similar, but
different sized isosceles triangles are positioned so that they share
one side as their base. Each one is filled with alternating dark and
light ‘rays’ emanating from the apexes, so that, at the bases one would
notice that the ending of a ‘dark’ ray of one triangle would meet the
ending of a ‘light’ ray of the other at the shared base. Instead what
happens is that each ‘ray’ is transformed into its opposite shade when
it travels through one of the three circles that sit directly on the
base that also defines the diameters of each of the circles. So we have
this diamond shape, which at its middle, bulges out into one large
central circle in between two smaller and unequal sized circles. We
have dark and light that emanate from opposing source points being
transformed into their opposites.
The square,
or diamond, is a traditional symbol of the Earth. As the Earth Diamond,
this formation which can be easily seen as a square form divided into
four parts by the baseline of the triangles and a line from the top
vertex to the bottom one, represents the “Virgin Earth, that is, Mother
Earth at the beginning of creation”. It is also emblematic of the
female sexual organ and, in Nordic tradition symbolizes the ‘Eye of
Fire’ (Walker 50).
So from the
start we have reference to the Earth as feminine, and also perhaps a
sense of the great hot centre of our Earth, the crystal iron core-a
source of life energy for Earthlings.
The light
and dark alternations and transformations are one of many references in
the crop circle phenomena to the creative power of light (i.e. the
‘blackhole’ formations of 2006, Sun/Moon references, etc. The idea of
interpenetration, interaction and alternation of the light and the dark
has already been referenced in the beautiful Yin-Yang crop circle of
Avebury Stone Avenue, May 8th of this year.
The circles
in this formation have many connotations. Their appearance at the very
crucial joining of the two triangles, the central focus of the
formation, and the meeting place of all the energy from the ‘rays’,
illustrates the product and purpose of the energetic movement. As was
noted in Freddy Silva’s ‘Secrets in the Fields’ three circles side by
side could represent the water molecule H2O (Silva 150). This is
consistent with the idea of Earth, known as the Blue Planet (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blue_Planet
), because from afar it looks like is it made of mostly water. The rays
inside the circles look like they could be refracted the way water
refracts light.

Secrets in the Fields.
(150) Thank you
www.whoismanu.com
Another,
perhaps more esoteric reference can be seen in the circles as they are
situated in the formation and as they relate to the whole design. This
reference brings us far back in time, which is, I believe, another
function of the crop circles. Seeing as the formations often appear
near ancient Neolithic sites, and perhaps even near sites that go back
as far as the Paleolithic Era, we could figure that the locations have
some meaningful significance. The idea of a relationship between this
formation and the Venuses of Laussel, Willendorf and Lespugue may seem
farfetched. However, when we look at this futuristic abstract formation
at All Cannings, and then compare its form, its vertical and horizontal
axes and the positioning of significant elements in relation to them, we
can see a plausible, although evolved, reference to the ancient
artifacts.
The first
obvious similarity between the Cannings-Devizes formation and the
goddess figurines can be seen in a comparison of the upper and lower
triangles joined at a shared base in the middle of the formation to the
upper and lower cones joined at the midriff of the goddesses. In spite
of the different sized triangles (smaller height in the upper triangle)
and the very wide base of the triangles in the crop formation, compared
to the equal-sized cones and a narrower base for the goddesses, the
similarity in the overall form is remarkable.
The second
similarity, which is harder to perceive, is the positioning of the three
circles in the crop circle compared to a similar positioning of three
constructed circles on the midline of each goddess image. The centre
points of the large circles are located on the meeting point of the
vertical and horizontal axes describing the greatest length and the
width of the figures, and the radius of the central circle was
determined by choosing a point in proximity to the ‘navel’ mark on each
figure. The smaller circles were determined by measuring half of the
distance from the edge of the central circle to the outside point of the
width, thus getting the radii. In all three instances, the three
circles corresponded to the ‘uterus/stomach’ area of each goddess, with
the smaller circles corresponding to the ‘hip’ forms. In this
comparison, the small circles in the crop circle are slightly different
in size, the larger one being on the left, whereas I have drawn equal
circles on each side of the central circles for the goddesses. The
abstract field version of the Great Goddess has a slight ‘bulge’ at the
equator that will prove significant when we look at the wobbly spinning
top effect a little later. Cultural historian, William Irwin Thompson,
in his book, Coming Into Being, describes the form and symbolic
function of the figurines as: “…the head and feet are narrow, and …the
overall general form is of two cones joined, where the equator of the
joined cones is the stomach, the omphalos of the Great Mother pregnant
with the All.” Perhaps the new futuristic artifact in All Cannings
fields also serves to represent a source or origin of creation, but at
this later stage in time.

Venus of Lespugue, 6
inches approx., found in Les Rideaux cave in the Pyrenees, in 1922,
mammoth tusk carving, c.25,000 B.C.

Venus of Willendorf,
4.5 inches approx., discovered in 1908 at Paleolithic site in Lower
Austria,nr Krems, Oolitic Limestone. c. 23,000 B.C.

Venus of Laussel, 1.5
feet high, found on wall of rock shelter in the Dordogne, France in
1911, bas-reliefin limestone, c. 22,000 B.C.
Another
observation about the figurines that could relate to the formation is
the idea that some of the sculptures, for example, the Venus of Lespugue,
seem to have been constructed in very clear sections that appear to be
proportional to each other in the same way as the ratios of a
monochord. According to the mathematician, Ralph Abraham, University of
California, Santa Cruz, as quoted in Thompson,
“the linear
measurements do match the heptatonic scale of
the Vedic Aryans and the Dorian mode of the ancient Greeks. Abraham
suggested further that the lines on the back of the Goddess of Lespugue
may refer to some prehistoric lute or sitar, one made from gourds or
clay that has not survived the millennia. … Since the Earth is said to
give out a tone from the gigantic iron crystal that is reputed to be
within the core of our planet, the idea of vibration may be part of some
prehistoric cosmology. Recently, New Agers, who are partial to crystals
and talk of vibrations, have marketed a whistle that is said to produce
the same tone that the earth does in space. Our ancient Paleolithic
ancestors may have had some similar religious feelings for sounds, for
chanting within caves, and used these statues to construct monochords.
Since there is an implicit canon of proportion here, and this canon does
seem to be repeated in other statuary, it does suggest that, at the very
least, more is going on here than a stone age taste for fat Venuses”
(105).
For more about the monochord and
how it relates to the music of the spheres see
http://www.lowbrassnmore.com/Monochord.htm .

Another point to
note regarding the Lespugue is evidence of a ‘polymorphic mode of
thinking’ in the Paleolithic people, a mode in which one form contains
many forms. The back of this statue, as well as resembling a musical
instrument, seems to have “male genitalia as well as female buttocks;
there is a visual system of punning between buttocks and testicles, and
eggs” (105). Thompson cites two musicologists who propose the existence
of two systems of ratios and tones, one considered to be female and
another male. This places the statue on the level of a ‘complex
hieroglyph that is expressing a cosmology’ (106). He cites the
anthropologist Gimbutas: “the breasts, buttocks, and thighs are in
ovine form to express the containment of the orphic cosmic egg within
the Great Mother.” (106). So in these goddess forms, there is found
representation of both the male and female sexes; the figures are
androgynous, emblematic and represent the Great Entity, Source, the
Void, Hunab ‘Ku, which would be named and depicted, naturally, ‘Mother’,
because at the dawn of human consciousness, the ‘mother’ was the obvious
source from which all individuals, male or female, originated. The
Willendorf figure shows a similar androgynous character in that the
breasts each look like a glans penis, which, like the breast, emits a
vital fluid. (108)
The spinning
top analogy brings us to the phenomenon of the precession of the
equinoxes that relates to the millennia as our Earth spins on its tilted
axis and travels with the solar system through space. Every two
thousand years or so, we enter a new constellation zone which gives its
name to an‘age’. For instance, we are leaving the Piscean Age and
moving into the Aquarian Age.
In
http://www.crystalinks.com/precession.html the significance of the
‘bulge’ at the equator as one cause of precession is noted:
“In popular science books
one often finds this explained with the analogy of the precession of a
spinning top. Indeed it is the same physical effect, however, some
crucial details differ. In a spinning top it is gravity which causes the
top to wobble which in its turn causes precession. The applied force is
thus in the first instance parallel to the rotation axis. But for the
Earth the applied forces of the Sun and Moon are in the first instance
perpendicular to it. So how then can they cause it?
The answer is that the
forces do not work on the rotation axis. Instead they work on the
equatorial bulge; due to its own rotation, the Earth is not a perfect
sphere but an oblate spheroid, the equatorial diameter about 43 km
larger than the polar. If the Earth were a perfect sphere, there would
be no precession.
The figure explains how
this works. The Earth is given as a perfect sphere (so that all
gravitational forces working on it can be taken equal as one force
working on its center), and the bulge is approximated to be a torus of
mass (blue) around its equator.”
The All Cannings formation
has a definite bulge at the middle, and it is emphasized by the fact
that one of the small circles is larger than the other, making the bulge
cause a slight ‘imbalance’.
 
Earth’s Poles Describing the Precession Circle Illustration of
Constellations in the Precessional Parade
The observations
regarding an androgynous nature are important because in the statues, as
well as in the crop formation we are discussing, there is a
representation of the Greater One that contains the Two, and the Two
could be perceived as opposite energies (i.e. Male, Female or Light,
Dark). Reference to the music of the spheres in the ratios found on the
Lespugue figure also gives us a clue about how to see the All Cannings
formation. The crop circle’s general shape is that of a giant top; some
tops elicit a humming sound when they spin. The Earth is supposed to
emit a unique tone as it spins through space. Finally, the observation
that the bulge in the formation could correspond to the equatorial bulge
of Earth connects this formation with the grand cycle of time marked by
the precessions of the equinoxes which number twelve, the number of
‘rays ‘ emitted from each pole of the formation. This brings our
attention to the fact that the completion of one grand cycle will take
place in December of 2012.
So far, there is
a lot of synchronous information that associates this formation with the
ancients and their relationship to the world and the cosmos. In spite
of the little we know about the Paleolithic and Neolithic ways of
perceiving their position in the universe, we do know that the
megalithic structures built all over the world are related to sun, moon
and star movements and positions, and to seasonal transitions, and if
one is to give any weight to the similarities we see between the
goddesses and the giant top, then we could deduce that the mode of
thinking of these ancient people was holistic/inclusive and polymodal/multi-faceted.
Perhaps they used intuition more than the linear, conceptual mode of
thinking we use these days. Is this harking back to the beginning
cultures of the grand cycle of 26,000 years some kind of wake up or
reminder that we have many options open to us as we proceed towards our
future? Is there a hint here that an open-minded approach to
understanding time, space, energy and the relationships between our
planet and our bodies, our planet and the universe is the key to a new
mode of living on Earth? The last alignment of our solar system with
the core of the Milky Way Galaxy was 26,000 years ago. It was the
beginning of a new human consciousness that produced the first human
cultural artifacts and began a whole evolution towards our present
culture of departmentalized disciplines: science, technology, art,
music, philosophy, literature, etc. Are we being kindly encouraged to
prepare for stepping into new ways of thinking, living and relating in
our future?
The Goddess
figure of Laussel does not contain the same bisexual characteristics of
her two sisters. Instead, she holds aloft, outside of her body, a horn,
or cornucopia, or perhaps something like a reed boat. This object
replaces the male symbolism in the other statues. The male element is
also considered to be the conscious ego aspect of our human psyche. The
object is notched with thirteen marks, indicating that the people who
carved her were at this point, marking time according to a lunar
calendar, but nevertheless noting the passage of time. Are we now being
launched on a brand new voyage, just as the ancient people who started
by understanding themselves as one with the Source, and who then
gradually moved psychologically, culturally away from the Unity and
began exploring and knowing life in its many possibilities? And are we
cognizant that the boat, the cornucopia, the life preserver is in the
hands of the UNIverse?

–
Michelle Jennings
Sources:
De Santillana,
G. & Hertha Von Dechend. Hamlet’s Mill: An Essay Investigating the
Origins of Human Knowledge and
its Transmission through Myth. David R.
Godine, Publisher, Inc. New Hampshire. 1977.
Encyclopédie des
Symboles. Françoise Périgaut, trad. de l’allemand. Le Livre de Poche.
1996.
Silva, Freddy.
Secrets in the Fields:The Science and Mysticism of Crop Circles.
Hampton Roads Publishing Co. Inc. Virginia. 2001.
Thompson,
William Irwin. Coming Into Being: Artifacts and Texts in the
Evolution of Consciousness. St. Martin’s Press. New York. 1998.
Walker,
Barbara. The Woman’s Dictionary of Symbols & Sacred Objects.
Castle Books. Edison, NJ. 1988. |