A possible resemblance between modern astronomical photographs of Sgr A* (the black hole at the centre of our galaxy) versus schematic depictions in ancient Mayan culture, or a crop picture from the 1990's

This Page has been accessed
free counter


Updated Thursday 7th  September  2006

 

AERIAL SHOTS GROUND SHOTS DIAGRAMS FIELD REPORTS


It has been difficult for modern astronomers to locate and photograph the centre of our Milky Way, because that region of space contains many closely spaced stars and dust.
 
Nevertheless, some excellent high-resolution photographs of our galactic centre (called Sagittarius A* or Sgr A*) have been taken over the past 10 years, two of which are shown below:
                                                                                                                                                                

                                                

 
A super-massive black hole at the centre of our galaxy: Sagittarius A* (from an MIT physics seminar by F.K. Baganoff)
 
In each case, the central orange region (left-hand photo) or central dark dot (right-hand photo) lies over a super-massive black hole called Sgr A*, while a long spiral of stars and dust proceeds outward from that black hole, downward and then to the left, depending on which wavelength was used.
 
Somewhat remarkably, the ancient Mayan symbol for "galactic centre" also consists of a downward curving spiral, just as if the people who drew it thousands of years ago knew what the structure of our galactic centre looks like:
 

 
A remarkable crop picture also appeared in 1994, which seemed to show the same downward-curving spiral for "Mayan galactic centre", as well as many "curly rays or waves" emerging from it:
 


(this image was inverted to match the others)  

 
The "curly rays or waves" shown in that 1994 crop picture might plausibly represent "Einstein-Rosen gravity waves", as implied also in several recent crop pictures.  
 
For example, Wayland's Smithy of July 2006 showed twelve "rays" emerging from a compact centre, while Etchilhampton Hill of August 2006 showed the space time-grid-lines and four-fold pointed-symmetry of a gravity-wave vibration (CCC elsewhere).
 
What are we to make of these remarkable data?
 
Perhaps the ancient Mayans in central America (as well as the Dogons in Africa) had access to highly advanced astronomical data, far beyond that which could be obtained through the naked eye alone?
 
When we combine: (a) the relation shown above with (b) long-term accuracy of the Mayan calendar (Lonnie Thompson, PNAS 103, 10536, 2006) and (c) an observation by John Major Jenkins, that the Mayan end date of December 22 matches a solar eclipse of the galactic center as seen from Earth, then it seems possible that such a central American, pyramid-building culture may not have risen in isolation!
 
Likewise, its easy conquest by Cortez in 1519 AD begins to make a lot of sense:
 
"When they first arrived by sea, the Aztecs thought that Cortéz was Quetzalcoatal, a white-skinned god of prophecy, who long ago had taught about agriculture and government, and whose return they were ready to welcome with great ceremony."
 

 
Or from Isabelle Kingston, as quoted in Freddy Silva's book: "They (the crop artists) came before in human form. They were the tall blonde teachers in every culture."
 
Other astronomical aspects of crop pictures
 
Referring again to the 1994 crop picture, its "crescent" on the right could symbolize an eclipse of the galactic centre by our Sun, as seen from Earth on December 21-22 of any year; while its "sperm" could refer to some future comet.
 
During any solar eclipse, those gravity waves could diffract around our Sun to shorter wavelengths in part, thereby producing some of Earth diameter. Sgr A* lies offset from the sky location of that annual eclipse by only 5 degrees. It is not known yet whether Sgr A* is a single system or else a binary. Soft x-ray emissions from Sgr A* were mapped to two discrete peaks (not shown).
 
Concerning the crop picture found at Etchilhampton Hill on August 15, 2006, it seems possible that a gravity-wave vibration as shown there could impact the "round ball of Earth" (background circle in same picture) one year after its date of formation, or roughly August 15, 2007. This would seem consistent with an an earlier estimate of August 13-16, 2007 for the same postulated event from Wayland's Smithy 2005.
 
Real or hoaxed?
 
Could all of these physics-astronomy crop circles have been made by human hoaxers, say from some British university cosmology department? Possibly, but twelve years (1994-2006) is a long time to sustain a complex scientific hoax. If some academic group has managed to achieve that feat, our sincere compliments to them!

AERIAL SHOTS GROUND SHOTS DIAGRAMS FIELD REPORTS

BACK

  
Mark Fussell & Stuart Dike