THE FACE AND MESSAGE AT CHILBOLTON

by Andreas Mueller

Updated Thursday 6th September  2001


The following comparisons show the crop formations in comparison to their likely counterparts/original on mars and the Arecibo message of 1974.

I have not seen the formations on the ground, so I can not judge their qualities. what I could do is working on their design and symbolism on a graphical basis - and that is what I did.

I leave it open to you, what you take out of the results. To me it seems most impressive that everything in the fields seems to have been designed and made in nearly 100% scale to the original counterparts.

Even the schematic version of the formation of 2000 that appeared in the same field as the message in 2001 is now shown in perfect scale and that with just the 1974  Arecibo-message-grid available to 'lay' it out (see: Picture 2).

message2.jpg (34974 bytes)

Click on thumbnail to enlarge Picture 2

Image Andreas Muller Copyright 2001

While it is no question at all that the so-called 'Message' or 'Answer' formation is directly related to the message sent into space from the Arecibo radio-telescope in 1974 (see: Picture 1), the original counterpart of the 'Face' is still in quest and to be discussed.

message1.jpg (97685 bytes)

Click on thumbnail to enlarge Picture 1

Image Andreas Muller Copyright 2001

I started my quest for something that would match it with the famous 'Face on Mars' because of it's origin in space - as the Arecibo-Message has a similar background...and who else did not spend a first thought on the 'face on mars' when seeing the 'Face on Earth'?

message3.jpg (55429 bytes)

Click on thumbnail to enlarge Picture 3

Image Andreas Muller Copyright 2001

So I did two comparisons with the 'Face at Chilbolton' and it's Martian brother. The first shows the 1976 version of the famous 'Face on Mars' in it's first, lower resolution (see: Picture 3). The second shows the comparison based on the actual photos of what's left of the 'Face' after erosion (see: Picture 4). I still believe that there are enough artificial aspects to even it's remains to call it a 'Face' and to keep an eye and interest on it.

message4.jpg (31092 bytes)

Click on thumbnail to enlarge Picture 4

Image Andreas Muller Copyright 2001

I did also some blind-tests on other famous and non-famous faces (my own that failed desperately, or the mask of pharaoh TutankhAmun - but they all don't have all these equivalent points to match with the 'Face at Chilbolton' Likely somebody else discovers similarities to other famous or non-famous 'Faces'. I would be interested to see them. 

The here shown results should not imply anything but cause interest and discussion.

Still there are just two possibilities about the 'Face' and 'Message' left:

1) Man-made... ...if so, there is no need for further research s it is just a nice BUT clever made joke on all of us and I will take part in laughing about myself for spending some hours on the computer...but it was fun.

2) Genuine not man-stomped... ...if so we got something of highest importance transmitted into the fields. Maybe some kind of communication - the long awaited 'First contact' and what year would be better than '2001'? or is it a message from within, a reply to our hope to find somebody out there? In the case that we are facing genuine - not man-stomped formations in the Chilbolton fields - one thing is for sure. the crop circles made a next step, a step we never experienced before.

Andreas Muller
ICA-The International Crop Circle Archive'
mueller@invisiblecircle.de
http://invisiblecircle.de - http://invisiblecircle.de/uk


Return to the Crop  Circle Connector

  
Mark Fussell & Stuart Dike

Hit Counter